Markets Flashcards
(109 cards)
Function of market?
What happens/goes on? Example?
Allocate scarce resources
Each buyer/seller exchanges something they have for something they’d prefer to have instead
Labour for salary - if rational, eco’ists assume tht worker would choose wages but less spare times & employers would pick employee/work potential over money/wage they give them
Mixed economy:
Combines free markets & Gov.
Planned economy?
Gov. decides allocation of resources e.g. North Korea
Free Market?
Supply/demand & price mechanism allocates resources = any prices
Pros of free market economy? (3)
Efficiency - any product can be bought/sold = only those of best value will be in demand so firms have incentive to make goods as efficiently as poss.
Entrepreneurship - rewards for good ideas e.g. new/improved prods = profit = encourages risk-taking & innovation
Choice - incentives for innov. => more choice for cons.
Cons of free market economy? (3)
Inequalities - huge diffs in income = unfair
Non-profitable goods may not be made e.g. medicine for rare med. conds. - not enough sold/profit = no incentive
Monopolies - successful businesses can become only supplier of prod - market dominance
Market failure =? Example? Solution + examples (3)?
When free markets result in undesirable outcomes e,g. traff cong.
Gov. intervention to correct - changing law/tax breaks/other incentive
+ buy/provide g/s
Mixed economy consists of?
*?
Public (Gov.) & Private sector (privately-owned businesses)
Never purely free market eco with no gov. intervention
Positive statements?
Example?
Important in economics because..?
Objective state’s that can be tested by referring to av. evid.
Less income = more shopping in pound shops
Way of testing whether eco ideas are correct/’testable’
Normative statements?
Example?
Important in eco because..?
Subjective + cont. value judgments - opinions
Pensions should be higher = agree/disagree? not true/false?
Value judgements influence eco decision-making & gov. policy
PPFs show? Below? Above?
Max. Poss. Output - what’s poss. using partc. level of res. e.g. partc. no. of people/capital & raw mats
Productively inefficient - with current level of resources, could build of 1 Good without giving up other Good production
Not achievable at current level of resources = extra/better resources needed
Trade off? (3)
When you have to choose between conflicting objectives because you can’t achieve all your obj’s same time
Compromising & aiming to achieve each obj. a bit
To do more of 1 = less of other
Opportunity cost?
Next best alternative you’re forced to give up So trade-off = opp. cost
What causes movement along PPF?
Reallocation of resources - fixed level of resources
What causes shifts in PPF? Examples of both? (2) Why?
Total amount of resources changing = PPF shifts inwards/outwards
Improved tech/improvements to labour e.g. training = outwards because more output prod. possible using same resources
Fewer total resources available e.g. nat. disaster - PPF shifts inwards = negative eco growth
Outward shift represents..?
Economic growth
*Sometimes PPF shifts…?
Only in one direction - stretches hoz/vert.
Poss. output grows but only helps prod. of 1 good
Eco agents’ Objectives?
Different eco agents e.g. producers/cons/gov = diff. eco objectives - max. something e.g. profit
Producers - eco objs?
Why? (3)
Firm’s profit calc. =?
*Other? (2)(2 e.gs) Why?
Assumed to want profit
Profit = firm can survive (loss/failure = eventu. close)
Allows to offer better rewards to owners/shareholders/staff
+ Re-invest in business for more future profits
Total rev minus total costs
*May want to maximise other quantities inst. e.g. total sales/firm’s market share
Bigger firms = oft. consd. more stable = attract best employees
Larger market share = monopoly power = can charge higher £’s due to lack of compt.
Ethical objectives e.g. help local economy - so buy from nearby supplier even if cheaper elsewhere
Consumers’ eco obj?
*? But?
Also*?
Assumed to want to max. satisf. while leaving within their means/not more than income
Satisf = security e.g. large pension contributions/spend on fast cars/holidays
But we assume they act rationally/for themself
Can also act as workers - who want to max. income while having as much free time as they need/want
Governments’ eco obj? Eco’ists?
This means?
Try to balance resources of country with the needs & wants of the population i.e. eco’ists assume govs want to max. “public interest” by achieving 4 eco objs
= Competing objs - policies helping 1 obj might make it more diff, to achieve another e,g, gov. spending may create more jobs but higher inflation?
Specialisation leads to? (2)
Overall adv?
Division of labour (type of spec’tion)
Production split into diff tasks + specific people allocated to each = economy can prod more stuff if people + firms specialise (+countries/regions e.g. tech comps based in Cali)
Advantages of specialisation? (4)
People can spec. in what they’re best as + can improve
= Better quality & higher quantity of prods for same amount of effort overall = increased labour of prod’vity
Spec = one way in which firms can achieve economies of scale e.g. production line
Spec. => more efficient prod’tion = helps scarcity prob. - resources used more efficient = more output can be prod. per unit of input
Disadvantages of specialisation? (3)
Workers = repititive tasks - boredom
Countries = less self-sufficient = probl. if trade is disrupted (e.g. war/dispute) e.g. country could specialise in manufact. so fuel’s an import = whole country in prod. if falls out with fuel supplier
Lack of flexibility e.g. if company moves, workforce left behind = struggles to adapt/dev. new skills e.g. coal mines - non-transferable skills (=structural unemplyoment incr.)




