Master List of Logical Fallacies Flashcards
(146 cards)
The A Priori Argument
A corrupt argument from logos, starting with a pre-set belief or conclusion and finding a justification for it. Often used by ideologues or fundamentalists to defend dogmas or doctrines. Example: Explaining away DNA evidence to deny evolution. Opposite: Taboo.
Ableism
A corrupt ethos argument asserting that those less capable or fortunate deserve less and can be victimized. It justifies unethical behavior with phrases like “Life is rough, and you gotta be tough.” Related to argumentum ad baculum.
Actions Have Consequences
The fallacy of mislabeling punishments as “consequences” to imply inevitability. Example: Saying expulsion is a “consequence” of misbehavior rather than a punishment. Opposite: Moral Licensing.
The Ad Hominem Argument
Attacking someone’s character instead of addressing their argument. Example: “He’s so evil you can’t trust what he says.” Variations include guilt by association or token endorsement. Opposite: Star Power fallacy.
The Affective Fallacy
The belief that emotions are self-validating and immune to criticism. Example: “I feel it, so it must be true.” Opposite: Chosen Emotion Fallacy. Related: Angelism.
Alphabet Soup
Overusing jargon or acronyms to confuse or impress. Example: “Our ASD and GT students benefit from K-12 interventions.” Common in pharmaceutical ads. Related: Name Calling.
Alternative Truth
Denying facts or truth entirely, often to manipulate or confuse. Example: Presenting “alternate facts” to control a narrative. Related: Gaslighting and The Big Lie Technique.
The Appeal to Closure
Insisting on a resolution for “closure” even when a point remains unsettled. Example: Justifying the death penalty for closure. Opposite: Paralysis of Analysis.
The Appeal to Heaven
Claiming divine or higher authority to justify actions. Example: “God ordered us to take this land.” Opposite: Job’s Comforter fallacy. Related: Moral Superiority.
The Appeal to Nature
Assuming “natural” things are inherently good. Example: Promoting poison ivy tea because it’s organic. Opposite: The Argument from Natural Law.
The Appeal to Pity
Using sympathy to argue a point regardless of its merits. Example: Supporting underdogs uncritically, as with the Arab Spring movement. Opposite: The Appeal to Rigor.
The Appeal to Tradition
Arguing something is correct because it has “always” been that way. Example: “Women have always been paid less, so it’s tradition.” Opposite: The Appeal to Novelty.
Appeasement
Giving in to demands to avoid conflict, encouraging manipulative behavior. Example: “The customer is always right.” Related: Bribery.
The Argument from Consequences
Dismissing a claim because the outcome would be undesirable. Example: “Climate change can’t be real, or it would ruin the economy.”
The Argument from Ignorance
Assuming something is true or false because it hasn’t been proven otherwise. Example: “We can’t prove evolution, so Genesis must be true.” Related: A Priori Argument.
The Argument from Incredulity
Rejecting something as false because it seems unbelievable. Example: “That’s crazy—it can’t be true!” Related: Hoyle’s Fallacy.
The Argument from Inertia
Continuing a flawed course of action to avoid admitting past mistakes. Example: “We can’t withdraw now; it would mean admitting we were wrong.” Related: Throwing Good Money After Bad.
The Argument from Motives
Rejecting an argument based on the speaker’s motives. Example: “Bin Laden wanted us out of Afghanistan, so we must stay.” Opposite: Justifying actions because of pure motives.
Argumentum ad Baculum
Using threats or force to “prove” a point. Example: “Agree, or I’ll knock you out.” Related: Censorship and intimidation tactics.
Argumentum ad Mysteriam
Using mystery or ritual to persuade instead of logic. Example: “Chanting ancient texts in Latin gives them more authority.” Related: The Long Ago and Far Away fallacy.
Argumentum ex Silentio
The fallacy that silence or lack of evidence on a topic proves a claim. Example: “Science can’t prove God exists, so He doesn’t” or “Science can’t disprove God, so He must exist.” Often misused in legal settings where silence is portrayed as guilt.
Availability Bias
Giving undue importance to information that is immediately available, often ignoring broader or contradictory evidence. Example: “We know this doesn’t work because it failed here,” ignoring successful instances elsewhere. Often paired with hyperbole, such as proclaiming a minor issue as “the worst in history.”
The Bandwagon Fallacy
Arguing something is true because “everyone” or “the majority” believes it. Example: “75% of people think Bob is a liar, so he must be.” This can escalate to coercion: “Get with the program, or get crushed.” Includes digital phenomena like Information Cascades, where people echo popular opinions online without questioning them.
The Big Brain/Little Brain
Blindly following a leader who claims they assume all moral/legal responsibility for followers’ actions. Example: “Don’t think with your brain, trust me instead.” Often tied to authoritarianism and justifications for harmful actions. Opposite: Plausible Deniability.