Mechanical Circulatory Support Flashcards

(35 cards)

1
Q

REMATCH Trial - primary endpoint and result

A

Survival at 1yr

50% - HeartMate XVE

25% - Control

Survival at 2yrs

20% - HeartMate XVE (Impacted by device failure/complications)

10% - Control

(NEJM 2001)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Trial demonstrating feasibility and safety of Continuous Flow vs. Pulsatile Flow devices

A

HeartMate II BTT/DT Trial (NEJM 2009/ATS 2006)

Compared HeartMate VE (continuous) vs. HeartMate XVE (pulsatile)

BTT

Primary Endpoint: 2-year Composite ⇒ 45% vs. 10%

  1. Death
  2. Disabling Stroke
  3. Reop for Device Failure

DT

HeartMate VE improved

  1. Adverse Event Profile (device malfunction)
  2. Hospital Readmission
  3. Functional capacity
  4. Survival
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

ENDURANCE Trial Primary Endpoint and Results

A

(NEJM 2017) RCT

HeartWare vs. HeartMate II

Primary Endpoint: 2-year Composite ⇒ 55% vs. 60% non-inferior

  1. Death
  2. Disabling Stroke
  3. Reop for Device Failure

HeartWare ⇒ more device failure

HeartMate II ⇒ more strokes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Momentum III Trial Primary Endpoint and Results

A

(NEJM 2016) RCT

HeartMate III vs. II

Primary Endpoint: 6-month Composite ⇒ 85% vs. 75%

  1. Death
  2. Disabling Stroke
  3. Reop for Device Failure

HeartMate III ⇒ less pump failure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Pulsatile vs. Continuous Flow Device - Adverse Event Profile

A

Table

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Temporary MCS Devices

A

IABP

ECMO

Impella (2.5/5.0/CP/RP)

CentriMag

TandemHeart (pVAD)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Compare/Contrast the ACC/AHA vs. NYHA Classifications of CHF

A

Table

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What does INTERMACS stand for?

A

Inter-Agency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

INTERMACS Classification System

A

1) “Crash and Burn” - persistent HoTN despite increasing inotropes; MSOF; increasing lactate, worsening acidosis

2) “Sliding on Inotropes” - worsening renal function, nutritional delpetion, refractory volume overload

3) “Dependant Stability” - stable BP, oragn function and nutritional status but unable to wean inotropes

4) “Frequent Flyer” - recurrent episodes of volume overload and hospital readmissions

5) “Housebound” - NYHA IV; fatigues with ADLs

6) “Walking Wounded” - comfortable at rest but fatigues with exertion

7) “Placeholder” - Advanced NYHA III

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Contraindications to Longterm MCS Device Implantation

A

Irreversible End Organ Dysfunction

Severe Hemodynamic Instability

Profound Coagulopathy

Complex Congenital Abnormalities

Restrictive Cardiac Disease (small LV dimensions)

Questionable Neurological Status

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

HeartMate II Multivariate Risk Score (HMRS)

A

Predicts 90-day postoperative mortality

Variables:

  1. Age
  2. Albumin
  3. Creatinine
  4. INR
  5. Implanting Center Volume

Low Risk < 1.5 ⇒ 5%

Medium Risk 1.5-2.5 ⇒ 15%

High Risk > 2.5 ⇒ 30%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

MELD vs. MELD-XI vs. MELD-Na Scores

A

MELD

  1. Bilirubin
  2. Creatinine
  3. INR

MELD-XI (anticoagulation compatible)

  1. Bilirubin
  2. Creatinine

MELD-Na

  1. Bilirubin
  2. Creatinine
  3. INR
  4. Sodium
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Cardiac lesions that should be addressed at the time of longterm VAD implantation

A

Moderate to severe AI

PFO/ASD

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How do you deal with AI at the time of LVAD inplantation?

A
  1. Park Stich
  2. Bicuspidize
  3. Oversew the Valve
  4. Bioprosthesis
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Causes of Acquired AI with LVAD

A
  1. Elevated Sheer Stress
  2. Elevated Transvalvular Gradient
  3. Decreased AoV Opening
  4. Abnormal AoV Biomechanics
17
Q

Guidelines for when to address AI, PFO, MS and TR at the time of LVAD Impantation

A

Class I

Presence of PFO ⇒ Close

AI > mild ⇒ Park Stitch, Oversew, BioAVR

MS > mild ⇒ Repair or BioMVR

Class IIa

TR > mild ⇒ Repair

MR reasonable to repair if bridge to recovery

18
Q

Risk Factors for RHF after LVAD Implantation

A
  1. Preop Mechanical Ventilation
  2. Increased CVP
  3. Increased CVP/PCWP
  4. Decreased RV Stroke Work Index
  5. RV Dysfunction
  6. TR
  7. Elevated WBC
  8. Elevated BUN
19
Q

Echocardiographic Predictors of RHF after LVAD

A
  1. Reduced free-wall strain
  2. RV/LV diameter ratios
  3. TR severity
  4. RVEF
20
Q

Which devices are currently FDA approved for…

Bridge-to-Transplant?

Destination Therapy?

A

Bridge-to-Transplant:

  1. HeartMate II
  2. HeartMate III
  3. Heartware (HVAD)
  4. SynCardia TAH

Destination Therapy

  1. HeartMate II
21
Q

Factors Required to meet Indication for Destination Therapy

A
  1. Not a Transplant Candidate
  2. Refractory HF despite OMT
    1. ​NYHA III-IV
    2. Frequent Flyer
    3. Diruetic Dependant
    4. VO2 < 14mL/kg/min
  3. Life Expectancy > 2-years
  4. No Irreversable End Organ Damage
  5. No Hx of Non-Compliance or Psychosocial Limitations
22
Q

Durable (Longterm) MCS Devices

A
  1. HeartMate II
  2. HeartMate III
  3. HeartWare (HVAD)
  4. SynCardia TAH (pulsitile)
23
Q

TEE Parameters used to adjust LVAD speed intraoperatively

A
  1. Chamber Size
  2. Interventricular Septum Position
  3. Degree of MR
  4. RV Function
  5. Aortic Valve Opening
24
Q

Direct and Calculated VAD Parameters

A

Direct

  1. Speed (rpm)
  2. Power expenditure (watts)

Calculated

  1. Flow (L/min)
  2. Pulsitility Index (HeartMate II only)
25
Causes of **Increased Velocity** at the **Inflow** **Cannula**
1. **Suction Event** (hypovolemia or inadequate preload) 2. Poor **Cannula Placement** (spetum or trabeculae) 3. **Pump Thrombosis**
26
Standardized Markers of **RV Dysfunction** following **LVAD**
1. Inability to wean from **CPB** 2. **MAP** \< 55mmHg 3. **CVP** \> 16mmHg 4. **SvO2** \< 55% 5. LV **Flow** Rate Index \< 2L/min/m2 6. Significant **Inotrope** Dependence
27
**Management** of **RHF** after **LVAD** Implantation
1. **Inotropes** (Milrinone, Dobutamine, Isoproterenol, Epinephrine) 2. **Diuresis** 3. **Sinus Rhythm** 4. Redeuce PVR (**Inhaled NO**) 5. **RVAD**
28
**ISHLT** Guidelines for **Anticoagulation** with **Durable VAD** Therapy
POD #1 1. IV **Heparin** POD #3 1. **Aspirin** 2. **Warfarin** (INR 2-3)
29
**Surivival** following **LVAD** Implantation
**30-day** Survival - **90%** **1-year** Survival - **85%** (HeartWare ADVANCE Trial and INTERMACS Registry)
30
**Risk Factors** Predicting Poor **Survival** After **LVAD** Implantation
1. **INTERMACS 1 or 2** 2. **Renal** Dysfunction 3. **Age \> 70** 4. **RV** Dysfunction 5. Need for **BiVAD** 6. Increased **Surgical Complexity**
31
**LVAD** vs. **Rx** pre-Transplant **Mortality** and **QOL**
30-day, 1 and 2-year Survival is Statistically equivalent **30-day** Survival - **95%** **1-year** Survival - **80%** **2-year** Survival - **70%** **QOL improves** with **LVAD** while awaiting transplant
32
**Adverse Event** Rates of **LVAD** Therapy
1. **Bleeding** (Reop for bleeding 30% with \>50% requiring blood products; GI bleeding rates 20-30% ) 2. **Device Malfunction** 3. **Renal Failure** (15-30%) 4. **Infection** (10-20% driveline infections by 1-year) 5. **Stroke** (10/20% at 1-/2-years - ischemic = hemorrhagic) 6. **Death** **30**-days - **40%** **1**-year - **70%** **2**-years - **80%** **3**-years - **85%**
33
Proposed **causes** of increased **GI bleeding** with **CF** **VADs**
1. Acquired **von Willebrand** Syndrome 2. **AVM** Formation (**Non-Pulsitile** flow) 3. **Anticoagulation**
34
Suspected vs. Confirmed **Pump Thrombosis**
Suspected 1. **Hemolysis** (Serum-free hemoglobin \>40mg/dL or LDH \>600IU/L) 2. Unexplained **CHF** Symptoms 3. Abnormal Pump **Parameters** Confirmed 1. **Direct** Inspection 2. **Radiographic** Imaging
35
**Histologic** and **Hormonal** Features of **Reverse Remodeling** for BTR
**Histologic** 1. Decreased **Collagen/Fibrosis** 2. Decreased **MMP** Activity 3. Decreased Myocardial **Apoptosis** 4. Decreased Myocardial **Hypertrophy/Myofibrillar Disarray** 5. Increased **SR Calcium** **​** **Hormonal** 1. Decreased **Sympathetic Tone** 2. Decreased **BNP** 3. Decreased **RAAS** 4. Decreased **ET-1** 5. Decreased Infalmmatory **Cytokines** (IL-6, IL-8, TNFa)