MEE - Crim/Crim Pro Flashcards

(32 cards)

1
Q

A search or seizure must be reasonable to be valid under the ___-

A

4A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Under the exclusionary rule, evidence obtained in violation of 4A is

A

inadmissible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

a police may stop a car if they have ___ to believe that a traffic violation was committed. Doesn’t matter if the traffic violation pretext has underlying alterior motive

A

probable cause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Police may seize an item in plain view from a place they are legally allowed to be if the officer has immediate _____ to believe the item is contraband or evidence, instrumentalities, or fruits of a crime

A

probable cause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

the officer had a right to be next to the car because the stop was ____

A

valid

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

the officer had PC to belive the bag contained cocaine because of its look, suspect’s rep as a drug dealer, and suspect’s answer to the question “are those your drugs” – “no that cocaine isn’t mind”

This establishes ____

A

probable cause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

With probable cause, under the automobile exception, an officer may search an automobiel without a ____

A

warrant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

The supreme court requires police to issue ______ warnings before conducting police interrogation

A

Miranda

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

any statement intended to elicit an incriminating response is an ____

A

interrogation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

a person is in custody if freedom of action is ____

A

significantly restircted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Under the fruit of the poisinous tree doctrine, evidence derived from unconstitutionally seized evidence generally is ____

A

excluded

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

at issue is whether Adam has the mens rea for ____

A

involuntary manslaughter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

a person commits involiuntary manslaughter when he causes a death by ___-

A

criminal negligence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

A person has the mens rea of criminal negligence when he (i) fails to be aware of a ______, and (ii) this failuer constitutes a deviation from the standard of care that a reasonable person would have exercised in the same situation

A

substantial and unjustifiable risk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Some states use a ____ standard for involuntary manslaughter and requrie that the person consciously disregard a substantial and unjustifiable risk

A

recklessness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

adam dropped several hundred marbles in front of two stop signs at the intersection

17
Q

adam told Bob that the cars would “slip on the marbles and they won’t be able to stop at stop sign”

this shows that Adam was AWARE of the _____ risk that cars might slip on the marbles and crash

A

substantial and unjustifiable risk

Adam must have also been aware that car crashes frequetnly result in injuries and death

18
Q

adam had the mens rea of recklessness b/c he was ____ that his conduct created a substantial and ______ risk of death or serious bodily injury and he consciously ____ that risk

A

aware

unjustifiable

disregarded

19
Q

Adam acted with criminal negligence because a reasonable person would have been aware that causing cars to slip at an intersection would create a substantial and injustifible risk of ____

A

sereious injury or death caused by car crashes

Therefore a jury could conclude that Adam acted with recklessness or criminal negligence

20
Q

At issue is the mens rea for second degree murder and when an intervening act will relieve a defendant from criminal liability

21
Q

in this jurisdiction, second degree murder is a killing done with a reckless indifference to an unjustifiably high risk to human life (or with the intent to ______, intent to inflict great bodily injury, or with the intent to kill without premeditation or deliberation)

A

commit a felony

22
Q

Defendant exhibited a _____ to an unjustifiably high risk to human life by pointing and shooting a rifle at a target just behind friend, given the high risk that Friend would likely be killed by such an act

A

reckless indifference

23
Q

The defendant’s act must be the _____ and the proximate cause of the victim’s death

A “but for text” is applied

A

cause in fact

24
Q

The defendant proximately causes the victim’s death when the death is a ____consequence of the defendatn’s conduct, even if he does not anticipate the precise manner in which the death occurs

A

natural and probable

25
An intervening act will shield the defendant from criminal liability when the intervening act is mere _____ or ____ The intervening act will then be deemed to be the actual,____ of the victim's death
coincidence unforeseeable proximate cause
26
Here, ___ the D's unlawful act of shooting the friend, there would have been no need to attempt to rush Friend to hospital, during which attempt Friend was further injured
but for
27
It is also ______that one would get into an accident while rushing another to the hospital for life saving care
foreseeable
28
The accident did nto appear to occur in an_____ manner
unusual
29
the D's act was the but-for and the ____ cause of the friend's death
proximate
30
voluntary manslaughter is the intentional killing of a human being without ________ committed in the _____ of passion due to _____
malice aforethought heat adequate provocation
31
involuntary manslaughter is when the D causes the death of another human being by engaging in conduct that creates an ________ risk of death or serious bodily injury the MAJORITY view is that the D must have acted " ". The minority view is some states " " is enough
unreasonably recklessly gross negligence
32
To prove attempt, the prosecution must prove TWO element (1) the D _____ to commit the crime, and (2) the D's acts went sufficiently beyond _______ to commit the crime Common law = "dangerously close" to the crime (CDC), whereas MPC requires that D's conduct be a "____" In most states, abandonment is NOT a defense
intended mere preparation substantial step (MPC - SS)