memory Flashcards
(103 cards)
what is the multi-store model of memory?
- atkinson and shriffin’s (1968-1971) MSM describes how info passes through memory system
- suggests memory consisted of 3 stores: sensory register, STM and LTM - STM + LTM being unitary states
- info passes from store to store in linear way + the stores are passive (hold onto info before it is moved on or lost)
what is the sensory register? when does info pass through it?
- stimuli from the environment pass into the register automatically
- part of the memory that comprises of several registers (one for each sense)
- not under cognitive control like LTM + STM
- info only passed on to STM if pay attention
what is the coding, capacity and duration of the sensory register?
- coding in each store is modality specific (iconic = vision/ echoic = sound)
- duration of material in SR very brief - less than half sec
- SRs have very high capacity
what is the STM? the duration of STM like? capacity? encoding?
- a temporary memory store
- coded mainly acoustically
- duration - lasts about 18 secs unless rehearsed
- capacity - 7+/-2 limited capacity store
what is maintenance rehearsal?
- occurs when we repeat material to ourselves over and over again
- can keep info in STM as long as we rehearse it - if rehearse long enough passes into LTM(elebarotive rehearsal)
How is information lost?
- through decay or displacement
what is LTM? what is duration like? capacity? encoding?
- potentially permanent memory store for info that has been rehearsed for prolonged time
- coded mostly semantically (meaningful)
- duration - unlimited
- capacity - practically unlimited
what is retrieval?
according to MSM when want to recall info from LTM has to be transferred back into STM by process called retrieval
one strength of MSM? ev
- support from studies showing LTM and STM are different
- Baddeley (1966) found tend to mix up words sound similar using STMs - but mix up words with similar meanings when use LTMs
- shows STM and LTM separate indep memory stores like MSM claims
counterpoint to strength of MSM (baddeley)? ev
- in everyday life form memories related to useful things - faces names etc
-but many studies supporting MSM use none of these
- words - baddeley
- digits, letters - jacobs
- consonant syllables with no meaning - p&p
- MSM may not be valid model of how memory works in everyday lives when have to remember meaningful info
two limitations of MSM? ev
- evidence for more than one STM store - KF- had amnesia + his STM for digits poor when read out loud to him but much better when read himself - could be another STM for non-verbal sounds - so MSM wrong claiming just one STM
- prolonged rehearsal not needed for transfer to LTM - according to MSM what matters about rehearsal is amount but craik + watkins (1973) found type important - elaborative rehearsal needed for LT storage - PR not necessary
- suggests MSM does not fully explain how LT storage achieved
what is elaborative rehearsal?
when you link the information to your existing knowledge or think about what it means
what is encoding? what are the forms?
- the way information is changed so that it can be stored in the memory
- three main ways info can be encoded
- visual (picture)
- acoustic (sound)
- semantic (meaning)
what is the procedure of Baddeley (1966) study?
- gave list of words to 4 groups of ppts to remember
- group 1- acoustically similar
- group 2- acoustically dissimilar-
- group 3- semantically similar
- group 4- semantically dissimilar
- ptps shown words + asked to recall in order
what were the findings of Baddeley’s study? what do they suggest?
- did task immediately - recalling from STM- did worse with acoustically similar words
- recalled after 20mins from LTM did worse semantically similar words
- findings suggest info is coded acoustically in STM and semantically in LTM
which study is research on coding?
Baddeley (1966)
which studies are research on capacity?
- Jacobs (1887)
- Miller (1956)
what did jacobs (1887) do?
- found out how much info STM can hold at one time by measuring digit span
- ptps presented with a list of letters or numbers which increase as they recall them correctly + then have to recall until they cant anymore
what were the findings of jacobs (1887)
found that mean span for digits across all ptps was 9-3 items and mean span for letters was 7-3
what did Miller (1956) do?
- made observations of everyday practice + noted things come in sevens
- thoughts span of STM about 7+/-2
- also noted that people can recall 5 words as easily as can recall 5 letters - do this by chunking
what studies show research on duration?
- P&P (1959)- duration of STM
- Bahrick et al (1975) - duration of LTM
what did peterson and peterson (1959) do?
- tested 24 students in 8 trials
- each trial the student given a consonant syllable to remember + 3 digit number
- told to count backwards from number to prevent mental rehearsal of syllable
- on each trial told to stop after varying periods of time: 3 secs, 6, 9..18.
what were the findings of P&P (1959)? what do they suggest?
- after 3secs average recall about 80%
- after 18secs - 3%
- findings suggest STM duration may be about 18secs unless verbal rehearsal is done
what did bahrick et al (1975) do?
- studied 392 ptps ages 17-74
- high school yearbooks obtained from ptps or some schools
- recall tested in various ways:
- photo-recognition test consisting of 50 photos some from ptps yearbooks
- free recall test - pfpts recalled all names of graduating class