Memory Flashcards
What is coding
how we process the information - changing it to a suitable form so it can be stored e.g. the STM codes acoustically
What is capacity
This is the amount of information that can be held in memory e.g. the capacity of STM is 5-9 items
What is duration
is how long the information lasts in memory e.g. information lasts 18-30 seconds in STM
the coding of the sensory register
Modality specific e.g. visual/iconic
the capacity of the sensory register
unlimited
the duration of the sensory register
limited- less than 0.5 seconds
the coding of the STM
acoustic
the capacity of the STM
5-9 items
the duration of the STM
limited- 18-30 seconds
the coding of the LTM
semantic
the capacity of the LTM
unlimited
the duration of the LTM
potentially forever/ unlimited
who studied the coding of the STM
-Baddeley
-STM codes acoustically as there was better recall with acoustically dissimilar words
who studied the capacity of the STM
-Miller
-Limited 5 to 9 items were recalled using the digit-span technique
who studied the duration of the STM
-peterson & peterson
–18-30 seconds, however maintenance rehearsal will increase duration
who studied coding in the LTM
-Baddeley
-LTM codes semantically, as there was better recall with semantically dissimilar words, after 20-minute prevention task
Who studied the capacity of the LTM
nobody
Who studied the duration of the LTM
-Bahrick
-Potentially a lifetime. Recall of classmates remained accurate after 47 years, improved with the use of correct cues
Research on coding of STM/LTM
-Baddeley
-showed ppt a list of words in 4 categories:
1. acoustically similar
2. acoustically dissimilar
3. semantically similar
4. semantically dissimilar
STM= Immediately after each presentation, ppt were asked to recall the lists in the correct order
LTM= 20 minutes after each presentation, ppt were asked to recall the lists in the correct order
STM findings = More mistakes made on the acoustically similar list
LTM findings = More mistakes made on the semantically similar list
Research on capacity
-Miller
Procedure:-
-digit span technique
-ppt given strings of unrelated digits
-that increased by one digit every time
-The ppts digit span was measured until the point where they could no longer recall the digits in the correct sequence
Findings:-
-ppts could recall 5-9 items
-more could be recalled if items were “chunked”
e.g. ppt can remember 5 words just as well as 5 letters
Conclusion:-
-Capacity of STM is limited 5-9
-Our digit span can be increased by putting several items into a meaningful chunk
Research on duration of STM
- Peterson & Peterson
Sample:- 24 Undergraduate students
Procedure:-
-ppts were briefly presented with a consonant trigram (HDF) to remember
-They were then given a three digit number and asked to count backwards from this number to prevent rehearsal
-They were stopped at different intervals (3,6,9,12,15,18 seconds) and asked to recall the consonant trigram
Findings:-
-After 3 seconds only 80% recalled the trigram correctly
-After 18 seconds fewer than 10% recalled correctly
Conclusion:-
-Information in the STM lasts 18 – 30 seconds unless it is rehearsed
Research on duration of LTM
-Bahrick
Procedure:-
-tested 392 American high school graduates aged between 17 and 74 on their memory of their former classmates
-In Condition 1 they had to recall the names of classmates using a photo yearbook
-In condition 2 they had to recall the names of their class with no photo cue
Findings:-
-In condition one 70% of participants recalled accurately after 48 years
-In condition two 30% of participants recalled accurately after 48 years
Conclusion:-
This shows certain types of information can potentially last a lifetime especially with the correct cues
Evaluate the studies into CCD of the STM/LTM AO3 limitation
-duration in the STM lacks mundane realism
-as the task of recalling consonant trigrams is artificial
-difficult to generalise the findings that information lasts 18-30 seconds to real life examples of the duration of STM
-as the research does not reflect most real life memory activities where what we are trying to remember is meaningful
-lowering the external validity of the research into the duration of STM
-however, some would argue that we do sometimes try to remember fairly meaningless things
-such as groups of digits (phone numbers)
-although the task is artificial it does have some relevance to everyday life
Evaluate the studies into CCD of the STM/LTM AO3 strength
-the research into coding of the LTM has high control over extraneous variables
-as it was carried out in a controlled setting lab
-e.g. the lists of words would be matched on their difficulty and each words would be shown to participants for the same amount of time
-this means that we are more likely to establish cause and effect between the IV (the list of words) and the DV (accurate recall)
-increasing the internal validity of the research into the coding of the LTM
Evaluate the studies into CCD of the STM/LTM AO3 strength
-Research into the capacity of STM is praised for having high reliability
-This is because the research was carried out in a controlled environment lab
-therefore the research could be repeated in the same conditions
-e.g. the same standardised instructions, the same digits given to participants and shown for the same amount of time
-in order to check for consistent results in to the capacity of STM
Evaluate the study into Duration of the LTM AO3 strength
-high in mundane realism
-as the research assessed real life memories of the individual’s old classmates
-this is a strength because it is something you might find yourself doing in everyday life
-e.g. searching for an old friend on social media
-easier to generalise the research findings of the duration of LTM to other real life applications
-increasing the external validity of the research in to the duration of LTM
Evaluate the study into Duration of the LTM AO3 limitation
-low control over extraneous variables
-as the research did not take place in a controlled environment
-e.g. how much contact the participants had with classmates after leaving school was not controlled
-cause and effect cannot be clearly established between the IV (length of time passed) and the DV (accurate recall of classmates)
-so firm conclusions cannot be drawn on the duration of LTM
-reducing the internal validity of the research findings
Intro into the Multi-store model of memory
-Atkinson and Shiffrin’s multi-store model describes how info flows through memory
-It is a structural model stating that Sensory STM LTM are separate unitary stores, and that information flows through the system in a linear way
3 features of the MSM of memory
structural
unitary
linear
Process of the MSM of memory
-stimulus from the environment will pass in to the sensory register
-This part of memory has several stores (one for each of the five senses)
-coding in each store is modality specific
-The two main stores are:-
-echoic (sound/auditory information – coded acoustically)
-iconic (visual information – coded visually)
-info in the sensory register has a duration of less than a second
-the capacity of the sensory register is high
-Info passes from the sensory register to the STM only if attention is paid to it
-If it is not being paid attention to the information decays
-STM is a limited capacity store the capacity of information is 5-9 items –info in the STM is coded acoustically
-duration of info is 18-30 seconds unless it is rehearsed
-if maintenance rehearsal occurs (repeating the information to ourselves) it can increase the length of time the information is held in STM
-if the information is rehearsed enough it will pass to the LTM
-LTM is a potentially permanent store for information that has been rehearsed for a prolonged time
-capacity is potentially unlimited
-information can last a lifetime in the LTM
-the LTM codes information semantically
-to recall information it has to be transferred from LTM to STM in a process called retrieval
Evaluate MSM of memory AO3 rts
-supported by research studies that show that STM and LTM are different unitary stores
-e.g. Baddeley found that ppt mixed up words that sound similar when using their STM but mixed up words that have similar meanings when using their LTM
-This study clearly suggests that coding in STM is acoustic and coding in LTM is semantic
-This supports the MSM because it supports the view that the STM and LTM are separate stores
Evaluate the MSM of memory AO3 RTS
-case study of Clive Wearing
-he suffers from amnesia in which he cannot transfer info from his STM to his LTM
-this is evident as when his wife re-enters the room after leaving just seconds before, he greets her as if it is the first time he has seen her in years
-this supports the MSM because it shows that STM and LTM are separate stores and that information must flow through in a linear way, first to STM then to LTM
Evaluate the MSM of memory AO3 RTS limitation
-low population validity
-case study of just one person, Clive Wearing, who has an unusual illness involving damage to the brain
-Therefore, it is difficult to generalise the findings to the wider pop. as their memory may operate differently
-thus limiting the support that the research provides for the multistore model of memory
Evaluate the MSM of memory AO3 limitation
-MSM could be too simplistic in stating that STM and LTM are unitary stores
-Shallice and Warrington’s research in to the STM conducted on patient KF, who suffered from amnesia
-found that KF’s recall in STM for digits was very poor when the digits were read aloud to him, but recall was much better when KF could read the digits himself
-This suggests that there must be different stores within the STM, one to process visual and one to process auditory information
-casting doubt on the theories assumption that the STM is unitary
Types of LTM
procedural
semantic
episodic
What is procedural LTM
-knowing how to do things
-e.g. memory of motor skills such as riding a bike
-non-declarative as they do not involve conscious thought
-Cerebellum and Motor Cortex