Memory Flashcards
what is interference?
when 2 pieces of information disrupt each other, resulting in forgetting in one or both.
name the two types of interference
proactive interference and retroactive interference
what is proactive interference
occurs when an older memory interferes with a newer one. (eg: when your teacher has learnt so many names in the past she has difficulty remembering her names in the new class.)
what is retroactive interference
when a newer memory interferes with an older one (eg: your teacher has learnt so many new names this year she has difficulty remembering the names of students last year)
when is interference worse
interference is worse when the memories are similar
describe the procedure of the research of effects on similarity
mcgeogh and mcdonald studied retroactive interference by changing the amount of similarity between two sets of material. the groups were synonyms, antonyms, words unrelated to original, consonants, 3 digit numbers and no new list.
what were the findings of the research on effects of similarity
when participants were asked to recall the original list of words, the synonyms had the worst recall. this shows that the interference is strongest when the memories are similar.
evaluate one strength of interference
one strength is that there is more evidence of interference effects in more everyday situations.
baddeley and hitch asked rugby players to recall the names of the teams they had played against during a rugby season. the players all played for the same time interval but some players missed matched due to injury. players who played the most games had the poorest recall.
this shows that interference can operate in at least some real world situations, increasing validity of the theory
evaluate one limitation of interference
interference is temporary and can be overcome by using hints to help us remember something.
tulving and psotka gave participants lists of words organised into categories, one list at a time. recall averaged about 70% for the first list but became progressively worse as participants learnt each additional list.
this shows that interference causes a temporary loss to material that is still in ltm.
what is retrieval failure
not being able to access memories that have been previously encoded and stored
what is the encoding specificity principle
it is when a cue has to be both present at encoding (when material is learnt) and present at retrieval (whne we are recalling it)
who discovered the encoding specificity principle
tulving researched into retrieval failure and discovered a consistent pattern of findings
what is context dependent forgetting
recall depends on external cue (eg weather or a place)
what is state dependent forgetting
recall depends on internal cue (eg feeling upset, being drunk)
procedure on research on context dependent forgetting
godden and baddeley studied deep sea divers who work underwater to see if training on land helped or hindered their work underwater. the divers learnt a list of words either underwater or on land and then were asked to recall the words either underwater or on land
findings of the research on context dependent forgetting
in two of these conditions the environmental contexts of learning and recall matched, however in the other two they did not. accurate recall was 40% lower in non-matching conditions.
conclusions of the research on context dependent forgetting
they concluded that the external cues available at learning were different from the ones available at recall and this led to retrieval failure
procedure of research on state-dependent forgetting
carter and cassaday gave antihistamine drugs to their participants. these drugs had a mild sedative effect making the participants slightly drowsy. this creates and internal physiological state different from the normal state of being awake and alert. the participants had to learn lists of words and passages of prose and then recall the information against four conditions.
findings of research on state-dependent forgetting
in the conditions where there was a mismatch between internal state at learning and recall performance on the memory test was significantly worse. so when the cues are absent there is more forgetting.
strength of retrieval failure
there are a lot of research studies providing evidence for retrieval failure as an explanation for forgetting.This is a strength because more supporting evidence increases the validity of an explanation.Evidence shows that retrieval failure occurs both in real life situations and in controlled conditions e.g a lab.
limitation of retrieval failure
baddeley argued that context effects aren’t very strong in real life.In order to see an actual effect in retrieval failure the contexts have to be very different and that it is very hard to do .This is a limitation as it means that real life applications of retrieval failure due to contextual cues don’t explain much forgetting.
why is misleading information a particular issue for eyewitness testimony
because police questions may direct a witness to give a particular answer
procedure for the research on leading questions
loftus and palmer arranged for 45 participants to watch film clips of car accidents and then asked them questions about it. participants were asked how fast the cars were going. there were five groups ad each group was given a different verb.
findings of research on leading questions
the mean speed was calculated for each participant group. the verb contacted was estimated 31.8 mph and the verb smashed it was estimated 40.5 mph. this leading question biased the eyewitnesses recall of an event.