memory Flashcards

(41 cards)

1
Q

Explain what is meant by the term, ‘capacity.’

A

This is a measure of how much can be held in memory. To is represented in terms of bits of information, such as number of digits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Explain what is meant by term, ‘coding.’

A

The way information is changed so that it can be stored in memory. Information enters the brain via the senses. It is then stored in various forms, such as visual codes, acoustic codes, or semantic codes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Explain what is meant by the term, ‘duration.’

A

A measure of how long a memory lasts before it is no longer available

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Define the term, ‘long-term memory.’

A

Memory for events that have happened in the past. (This lasts anywhere from 2 minutes to 100 years). LTM has potentially unlimited duration and capacity and tends to coded semantically

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Define the term, ‘short-term memory.’

A

Memory for immediate events. STM measured in seconds and minutes. limited capacity of 4 items or chunks and tends to be coded acoustically. - ‘working memory.’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Describe a research that has investigated capacity in STM.

A
  • capacity of STM = assessed using a digit span —> Jacobs used this technique to assess STM capacity.
  • he found that the average span for digits was 9.3 items and 7.3 for letters.
  • Miller wrote article, ‘the magic number seven plus or minus two.’ —> concluded span of immediate memory is seven items - ppl can count seven dots flashed on a screen but not many more
  • people can recall five words/letters - we chunk things together and then remember more
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Evaluate the research the investigated the capacity of STM.

A

P: one criticism of research investigated STM is that Miller’s original findings have not been replicated.
E: Cowan reviewed variety of studies on the capacity of STM and concluded STM likely to be limited to 4 chunks
—> research on capacity of STM for visual info + 4 items was about the limit
E: this means that the lower end of Miller’s range is more appropriate
L: This suggests that STM may not be as extensive as was thought

P: strength - size of the chunk affects how many chunks you can remember
E: researchers found that people has a shorter memory span for larger chunks (8 word phrases) than smaller chunks, such as one-syllable words
E/L: This continues to support the view that STM has a limited capacity and refines our understanding.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Describe research that has investigated the duration of STM

A
  • Peterson and Peterson studied duration of STM, using 24 students - each ppt tested over 8 trials.
  • they were asked to recall the consonant syllable after retention interval of 3,6,9,12,15 secs. During retention interval, they count backwards from their 3 digit number.
  • ppts were 90% correct over 3 seconds, 20% correct after 9secs + 2% correct after 18secs - so short duration
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Describe research that investigated the duration of LTM

A
  • Bahrick tested 400 people on their memory of classmates —> photo-recognition test consisted of 50 photos, some of participants high-school yearbook.
  • free recall test : ppts asked to list names they could remember of those in graduating class
  • ppts tested within 15 years of graduation = 90% accurate in identifying faces.
  • 48 years = 70%
  • free recall test = 60% accurate after 15 years, dropping 30% after 48 years
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Evaluate research the duration of STM.

A

P: a criticism of Peterson’s study is that it did not actually measure out what it is set out to measure
E: in peterson’s study: pts counting the numbers in their STM and this may displace or ‘overwrite’ the syllables to be remembered.
E: researchers used auditory tones instead of numbers so displacement wouldn’t occur and found that the duration of STM was longer
L: this suggests that forgetting in the study was due to displacement rather than decay.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Evaluate research into the duration of LTM.

A

P: bahrick’s researched used 400 American uni graduates and therefore lacks population validity.
E: psychologists unable to generalise the results of Bahrick’s research to other populations, for example = students from UK/europe.
E: as a result, we unable to conclude whether other populations would demonstrate the same ability to recall name and faces

P: it could be argued that Bahrick’s study has high levels of ecological validity as the study used in real life memories
E: participants recalled real life information by matching pictures of classmates with their names.
E: these results reflect our memory for real-life events + can be applied to everyday memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Describe research that investigated coding in memory

A
  • following words acoustically similar but semantically different: can, cab, cad. Following words are the opposite: semantically similar but acoustically different: great, larger, long
  • Baddeley used word lists like those above to test the effects of acoustic and semantic similarity on STM and LTM. He found participants had difficulty remembering acoustically similar words in STM but not LTM, but semantically similar words posed little problem for STMs but led to muddled LTMS.
  • STM is largely encoded acoustically but LTM encoded semantically
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Evaluate the research into coding in memory

A

P: some experiments shown visual codes used in STM
E: researchers found that participants used visual coding in STM if were given visual task and prevented from doing any verbal rehearsal in retention interval before performing visual task
E: normally, ‘translate’ visual images into verbal codes in STM but ppts used visual codes + other researchers: STM sometimes uses semantic code
L: this suggests that STM is not exclusively acoustic

P: in general, LTM appears to be semantic but not always
E: evidence showed that long-term recall was related to visual as well as semantic categories, and researchers found evidence of acoustic coding in LTM
E: therefore, it seems that coding in LTM is not simply semantic but can vary according to circumstances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Briefly explain what is meant by the multi-store model in memory

A
  • an explanation of memory based on 3 separate memory stores, and how information is transferred between these stores
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Outline the multi-store model of memory

A
  • sensory register = information is held at each of the senses - eyes, ears, nose, fingers, tongue, and corresponding areas of the brain. Capacity is large - sensory register constantly receiving info, but most of this receives no attention and remains in sensory register for brief duration (milliseconds)
  • attention = if person’s attention focused on one of sensory stores, then data is transferred to STM.
  • STM = information held in STM so can be used for immediate tasks —> limited duration (30 secs) + limited capacity 7-9 items as info will disappear from STM if new info enters ‘displacing the info.’
  • maintenance rehearsal = repetition keeps info in STM but such depiction will create long term memory —> Atkinson and shifting proposed direct rs between rehearsal in stm and stength of LTM
  • LTM = unlimited capacity, duration up to a lifetime. Retrieval = process of getting info from LTM involves info passing back through STM.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Explain the strength of the multi-store model of memory

A

P: controlled lab studies on capacity, duration and coding that support the existence of a separate of short and long term store, which is the basis of the MSM.

E: studies using brain scanning techniques have demonstrated that there’s a difference between STM and LTM.

E: other evidence found prefrontal cortex is active during STM but not lTM tasks + squire used brains canning and found hippocampus is active when LTM engaged.

L: this evidence provides strong support for the MSM.

C: Counterargument = issue of ecological validity - despite providing valuable insights into brain regions involved in memory processes —> involve artificial tasks or controlled environments that don’t reflect how memory operates in real life settings —> not accurately represent how hippocampus functions during everyday tasks —> can’t generalise to real world memory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Explain one criticism of the multi-store model of memory

A

P: the MSM suggests that both STM and LTM are single ‘unitary’ stores but, research does not support this.

E: the working memory model and supporting research shows the working memory (STM) is divided into a number of qualitatively different stores. (Not a difference in terms of capacity and duration) but this also true for LTM.

E: research shows there are a number of qualitatively different kinds of LTM and each behaves differently. For example, maintenance rehearsal can explain long-term storage in semantic memory but doesn’t explain long-term episodic memories

L: this suggests that the MSM may be overly simplistic

18
Q

Explain another strength of the multi-store model of memory

A

P: psychologists have also shown that different areas of the brain are involved in STM and LTM from their case studies of individuals with brain damage

E: one case involved a man ‘HM’, his brain damage was caused by an operation to remove the hippocampus from both sides of his brain to reduce the severe epilepsy he had suffered.

E: HM’s personality and intellect remained intact but he could not form new LTMs, although he was able to retrieve information from before his surgery.

L: this provides support for the MSM’s notion of separate stores, as HM was unable to transfer information from his STM and LTM, but he was able to retrieve information from before his surgery.

C: Counterargument = studies like HM = evidence might not apply to everyone as relying on case studies risk overgeneralising from a small sample size, results may not reflect the experiences of typical individuals with no neurological damage —> therefore while case studies can provide valuable insights, they not sufficient on their own to support a theory like the MSM.

19
Q

Briefly explain what is meant by the working memory model

A
  • an explanation of the memory used when working on a task. Each store is qualitative different.
20
Q

Describe the role of the central executive in the working memory model

A
  • central executive = monitors and coordinates all other mental functions in working memory. —> limited capacity
21
Q

Describe the role of phonological loop in the working model memory

A
  • codes speech sounds in working memory
  • Baddeley subdivided this group:
    —> processes speech-based info preserving its order within phonological store which acts like an ‘inner ear’

—> the articulatory process (inner voice) is linked to speech production and used to rehearse and store verbal info from phonological through form of maintenance rehearsal.

  • limited capacity = 2 secs —> confusions often occur with similar sounding words as its an acoustic store
22
Q

Describe the role of the visual-spatial sketchpad inn the working memory model

A
  • codes visual information in terms of separate objects as well as the arrangement of theses objects in one’s visual field
  • logie: divided into:
    —> visual cache: stores information about visual items (form/colour)
    —> inner scribe: stores arrangement of objects in visual field
23
Q

Describe the role of the episodic buffer in the working memory model (2000)

A
  • receives input from many sources, temporarily stores this information, and then integrates it in order to construct a mental episodic of what’s being experienced
  • limited capacity and maintains time-sequencing recording events as they happen and transferring this info into LTM.
24
Q

Explain the strength of the working memory model. Include a counterargument with this.

A

P: there is studies of individuals with brain damage also support the WMM.

E: Researchers studied a man called KF whose short term forgetting of auditory info was greater than that of visual stimuli + auditory problems limited to verbal materials

E: This means that his brain damage seemed to be restricted to the phonological loop + another patient, LH - performed best on spatial tasks than those involving visual imagery

L: supports the idea of separate visual + spatial systems, as suggested by the WMM

COUNTERARGUMENT:
- problems with using evidence from case studies as individuals may have other difficulties such as paying attention - underperforming to certain tasks —> unique and cannot be generalised to population.

25
Explain one criticism and another strength of the WMM
Criticism: P: objective evidence comes from PET scans that show diff parts of brain become activated when doing visual + verbal tasks E: suggests the phonological loop + visuospatial sketchpad are separate systems supported by biological evidence E: only model for temporary STM + not attempt to explain how memory works as whole including LTM. —> model is incomplete Strength: : development WMM is dual task performance E: task 1 occupied CE, task 2 either involved the articulatory loop or involved both CE and articulatory loop —> task 1 slower than task 2 —> demonstrates dual task performance effect + shows CE is one of the components of working memory
26
Define the term, ‘interference.’
An explanation for forgetting in terms of one memory disrupting the ability to recall another. This is most likely to occur when the 2 memories have some similarity
27
Briefly explain what is meant by the terms ‘proactive interference’ and ‘retroactive interference.’ Provide examples (4 marks)
- proactive interference occurs forward in time with coding of new memories being interfered with due to past similar memories —> example: old mobile number recalled when trying to recall new mobile phone number - retroactive interference occurs backwards in time when coding of new info disrupts previously stored info —> example: unable to remember how to play the guitar after learning how to play the piano
28
Describe one study that demonstrated that proactive interference may cause forgetting
- underwood showed PI. - analysed findings from number of studies + concluded when ppts have to learn series of word lists they don’t learn lists of words encountered later on in sequence as well words earlier on. - if ppts memorised 10+ lists, after 24hrs, they remembered 20% of what they learned
29
Describe one study that demonstrated that retroactive interference may cause forgetting
Muller et al. First to identity RI effects. - gave participants a list of nonsense syllables to learn for 6 mins and after a retention interval: asked ppts to recall the lists - performance less good if ppts given an intervening task between initial learning and recall —> intervening task produced RI as later task interfered with what had previously been learned
30
Describe Baddeley and hitch’s study
- investigated interference effects in everyday setting of rugby players recalling names of games in season but others misses some games due to injuries - if decay theory correct, all players should recall a similar % of the games played as time alone should cause forgetting - if interference theory correct, those players who played most games should forget proportionately more as of interference
31
Explain one strength of interference as an explanation of forgetting
P: real world application to advertising. - when people are exposed to adverts from competing brands within short period E: researchers found that both recall and recognition of an advertiser’s message were impaired when ppts exposed to 2 ads for competing brans within a week E: so, one strategy - to enhance memory trace by running multiple exposures to advertisement on one day rather spread over the week —> results: reduced interference from competitors L: shows how interference research can help advertisers maximise effectiveness of their campaigns + target spending effectively.
32
Explain one weakness of interference as an explanation of forgetting
P: research is artifical - bot pro and retro concerns the methodology of the studies E: most of this research used artificial lists of words/nonsense syllables. So, this means the findings may not relate to everyday uses of memory, tends not to involve word lists E: participants may also lack motivation to remember links in such studies + this may allow interference effects to appear stronger than they really are L: This means that research is low in ecological validity. Counterargument —>interference effects been observed everyday situations
33
Describe what is meant by the term, ‘eyewitness testimony.’
The evidence provided in court by a person who witnessed a crime, with view to identifying the perpetrator of crime.
34
Explain what is meant by a ‘leading question.’ Use an example in your answer.
- a question that, either by its form or content, suggests to the witness what answer is desired or leads him/her to the desired answer - example: ‘did you see the broken glass after the car crash’ - implies that there was broken glass, even if there wasn’t.
35
Explain how post-event discussion might create inaccuracy in eyewitness testimony (3)
- a conversation between co-witnesses or an interviewer and an eyewitness after a crime taken place which may contaminate a withness’ memory - research support showed high number of witnesses 71% who had discussed the event went on to mistakenly recall items acquired during discussion - each time witness interviewed there’s possibility that comments from interviewer become incorporated into recollection of events.
36
Discuss one research related to the effect of misleading information on eyewitness testimony
Loftus and palmer - 45 students shown 7 films of different traffic accidents. After each film —> ppts given questionnaire which asked them to describe the accident + answer series questions. “How fast were cars going when they hit each other” - for one group, other 4 groups given verbs ‘smashed, collided, bumped or contacted’ - findings:words that implied stronger collision resulted greater average estimates of speeds from ppts —> exposed to ‘smashed’ gave the highest estimates while ‘contacted’ resulted lowest speed estimate —> leading questions influence memory recall.
37
Explain one strength of research into the effect of misleading information.
P: the laboratory condition allowed researchers to control for extraneous confounding variables and clearly see the link between leading questions and recall E: the laboratory setting also made easier to verify results for reliability through replication and establish cause and effect relationships between leading questions + memory recall which would be hard to do real world settings L: repeat studies concluded similar findings leading researchers conclude leading questions and misinformation can affect recall
38
Explain one weakness of misleading information - eyewitness testimony
P: the use of students may have been a confounding variable in itself rather than leading questions E: they are not representative of the range of ages in their normal population and therefore the sample lacks population validity E: also, research suggests age may be a confounding variable variable in itself when it comes to leading questions with researchers finding younger children more susceptible to influence to misleading info than older L: therefore this study may lack internal validity as it may be more of a measure on how leading questions affects one particular age group rather than the wider population
39
Explain how anxiety might affect the accuracy of eyewitness testimony (4 marks)
- anxiety refers to an unpleasant emotional state that is often accompanied by increased heart rate and rapid breathing. - positive affect on accuracy = arousal creates more enduring memories - research: evidence of enhanced recall when they questioned 58 real witnesses to bank robberies —> study showing anxiety does not reduce accuracy of recall memory for negative emotional events better than neutral events - Yerkes-Dodson effect = occasions when anxiety is moderate and eyewitness accuracy would be enhanced. When anxiety is too extreme the accuracy will be reduced
40
Describe one research study related to the effect of anxiety on eyewitness testimony.
- Johnson and Scott —> weapon focus effect (the view that weapon in criminal hand distracts attention from other features) = reduces identification - asked pts sit in waiting room where they heard argument in adjoining room + saw man run thru in room carrying either a pen covered in grease or knife covered in blood + asked to identify man from photos - findings support idea of weapon focused effect —> mean accuracy = 49% identify in pen condition + 33% in knife condition. - weapon caused attention to be physically drawn towards weapon itself and away from person face
41
Explain one strength of the effect of anxiety on eyewtiness testimony
P: one strength is that there is research studies of anxiety in the context of a real crime. E: may be the case: lab studies do not create real levels of anxiety experienced by a real eyewitness during an actual crime. E: BUT RESEARCHERS found from review 34 studies that lab studies demonstrate anxiety leads to reduce accuracy + real life studies associated with an even greater los of accuracy L: findings are at odds with christinanson et al. - but suggests results from lab studies are valid, as they supported by real life studies.