Memory Flashcards

(65 cards)

1
Q

What is sensory input and what are the 5 inputs.

A

information from our environment:

Echoic store - auditory.
Ionic store - visual.
Haptic store - touch.
Gustatory - taste.
Olfactory - smell.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Outline the STM.

A

Used for present and immediate tasks i.e recalling someones name immediately after learning it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Outline the stages of memory.

A

Encoding - converting information into a format that can be stored.
Storage - holding information in memory until needed.
Retrieval - Finding and accessing memory when needed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Outline the LTM.

A

For permanent memory - store of events i.e a birthday party.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is episodic memory. (Type of LTM memory).

A

Recall events form our lives they are time stamped and emotionally charged i.e graduating university.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the 3 types of LTM.

A

Episodic.
Semantic.
Procedural.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is semantic memory? (Type of LTM).

A

Knowledge of the world/ general facts. I.e the capital of France is Paris.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is procedural memory. (Type of LTM).

A

Memory for actions/skills (how to do things) i.e riding a bike.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Evaluate types of LTM.

A

Neuroimaging evidence shows LTM has different stores i.e PET scans.
Practical application - allows psychologists to target certain memory.

Clive wearing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Evaluate the MSM.

A

Supported by amnesia patients where patients either loose STM or LTM suggesting separate stores - Clive wearing (He can process information but couldn’t transfer it to the LTM) - showing they are different stores.

Baddeley found similar sounding words mix up in the STM and similar meaning words mix up in the LTM proving that the STM - acoustic and LTM - semantic.

Reductionist - over simplifies memory into 2 stores when the STM and LTM have different stores.

KF - suffered Brian damage in a motorbike accident - his LTM was intact but he had difficulties with STM. - Suggesting that STM and LTM are separate stores.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How is the STM forgotten.

A

Decay.
Displacement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How is sensory memory forgotten.

A

Decay.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How is LTM forgotten.

A

Interference.
Retrieval failure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Duration of the sensory memory.

A

Visual - 500 milliseconds.
Auditory - 2 - 3 seconds.
Crowder.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Capacity of the sensory memory. (Outline the study).

A

Holds all sensory experience - very large
Sperling - flashed symbols to ps 1/20 of a second and found p’s could only recall 3 -4 symbols however they reported seeing more items which shows that all information was originally there.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Coding of the sensory memory.

A

Sense specific i.e the echoic store from auditory information.
All it is, is all the stores.
Crowder.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is sensory memory.

A

The brief storage of the sensory input - just enough time to process it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Coding in the STM.

A

Mainly acoustically.
Baddeley - P’s asked to remember acoustically similar and dissimilar words. Semantic similar and dissimilar words. - EV lab study however didn’t use meaningful material - limited application.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Duration of the STM.

A

18 - 30 seconds.
Petersons + Petersons - trigrams to recall every 3 days.
Interference task while doing it from 3 seconds to 18 seconds.
EV - trigrams are artificial - lacks external validity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Capacity of the STM.

A

7 +/- 2 items.
Miller - digit span technique - repeat digits after him.
i.e
9
98
987
9876
98765 and so on.

Ev - lab experiment - replicated.
Lack ecological validity - doesn’t reflect real life activities.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Capacity of the LTM.

A

Unlimited.
Wagenaar - diary entry of 2400 events over 6 years and tested his recall of events not dates - excellent recall.
Ev - not representation - 1 person.
Could be an element of bias.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Duration of the LTM.

A

Up to a lifetime.
Bahrick - School photos - recall classmates over a 50 year period.
60% remembered after 47 years.
Ev - high external validity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Coding of the LTM.

A

Mainly semantically.
Baddeley - recall acoustically similar and dissimilar words and semantically similar and dissimilar words.
EV lab study however didn’t use meaningful material - limited application.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Outline proactive interference.

A

When older information interferes with new information i.e the names of previous neighbours are remembered instead of the new neighbours who just moved in.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Outline retroactive interference.
When a new memory prevents the recall of an older memory i.e forgetting your old phone number shortly after learning your new one.
26
Outline Underwood and Postman's study on retroactive interference (ev).
Underwood and postman - investigated how retroactive interference affected learning. - P's had to learn paired words. Control had one list experimental had two. He found recall of the control group (1 list) was more accurate suggesting learning the second list interfered p's ability to recall the 1st list .
27
Outline Baddeley and Hitch's study on retractive interference (ev).
Baddeley and Hitch asked rugby players to recall the names of teams recently played. Players who hadn't played any other matches had better recall compared to players who did. Supporting retroactive interference.
28
Evaluation of interference.
Interference is seen as relatively unimportant and how much it contributes to forgetting is unclear as both memories need to be quite similar. Proactive interference - most research uses word lists - lacks ecological validity. Baddeley and Hitch. Underwood and Postman.
29
Outline what a cue is. (Retrieval failure)
A hint or trigger that can help retrieve a memory. Can be sights, sounds, smells or emotions. I.e hearing a particular song can take us back to a particular memory in our childhood.
30
What are the two types of cue dependent forgetting.
Context dependant retrieval. State dependant retrieval.
31
Outline context dependent retrieval.
Occurs when external cues (external environment) is different at recall from how it was at coding. I.e getting fewer marks in an unfamiliar room compared to a familiar classroom.
32
Outline what state dependent retrieval failure is.
Forgetting occurs when the individuals internal environment is dissimilar at recall compared to when it was coded. I.e trying to recall info learned whilst sober when drunk.
33
Outline supporting research for context dependent retrieval failure. (ev).
Godden + Baddeley - had 4 groups of divers: Learn and recall on land. Learn and recall underwater. Learn on land recall underwater. Learn underwater recall on land. Founds p's who learned and recalled in the same place had better recall - shows environment acts as a cue. Ev - Lacks ecological validity - not an everyday task. Real world application - exams should be done in same rooms - external validity.
34
Outline supporting research for state dependent retrieval failure. (ev).
Goodwin got uni students to hide money and alchol when drunk - when sober students couldn't find it however when drunk again could.
35
Outline the factors affecting EWT.
Misleading information: Post even discussion. Leading questions. Anxiety.
36
Outline post event discussion.(Factors affecting EWT).
When co - witnesses discuss the crime leading to their testimonies becoming contaminated as they combine (mis)information from other witnesses with their own memory.
37
Supporting research for post event discussion. (Factors affecting EWT). - AO1
Gabbert - Made pairs of p's watch a video of a crime scene from different view points therefore seeing slightly different things. He found that p's who discussed - 71% mistakenly recalled aspects of the crime however the control group who didn't discuss the error rate was 0%.
38
Evaluate post event discussion study Gabbert. (Factors affecting EWT).
+ Used two different populations - students and adults - high population validity. + Lab study - easy to replicate - high reliability. - Low ecological validity - knew they were being studies so may have took closer attention to the video.
39
Outline leading questions. (Factors affecting EWT).
Suggests a certain answer in the way they are worded i.e you like psychology don't you?
40
Outline supporting research for leading questions (Factors affecting EWT). - AO1.
Loftus + palmer - 45 students shown videos of car accidents. After video p's answered a questionnaire where the verb changed. "How fast was the car going when it ....... the other car?" Verb - hit, contacted, smashed, collided and bumped. Found the lowest speed predicted was contacted at 31.8mph and the highest being smashed at 40.8mph. Showing leading questions can lead to unreliable EWT.
41
Evaluate Loftus + Palmer for leading questions. (Factors affecting EWT).
- Doesn't take into account individual differences - leading questions may not affect everyone. - Lacks ecological validity - less stress unlike the real world.
42
Does anxiety have negative or positive effects on EWT?
Both - optimum level.
43
How can anxiety have a negative effect on EWT? (Factors affecting EWT).
Due to the weapon focus effect p's fixate on the weapon due to the fight or flight response - this intense focus leaves the offender less noticed i.e colour of clothes.
44
Outline who supports the weapon focus effect. (Factors affecting EWT). - Anxiety has a negative effect on EWT. (AO1).
Johnson + Scott - P's sat in a waiting room - believed they were taking part in a study. 1st condition - (low anxiety) a man walked out with a pen and grease in his hands after the p's heard him discussing in the back - 49% recalled correctly. 2nd condition - (high anxiety) - p's heard smashing and breaking glass then a man covered in blood holding a knife came out. - 33% recalled correctly.
45
How can anxiety have a positive effect on EWT? (Factors affecting EWT).
Increased adrenaline from the crime which triggers fight or flight leads to higher alertness and improves memory.
46
Outline research which supports anxiety having a positive effect on EWT. (EV) (Factors affecting EWT).
Yullie and Cutshall - 13 witnesses who saw a real life armed robbery were interviewed 4/5 months after it happened and their interview was matched to the original police reports. - They also rated their stress levels from 1-7 - those who were more stressed were more accurate at 88% compared to the less stressed people. * For AO3 on the effects of anxiety on EWT you can use 1 alternative explanation i.e misleading questions*
47
What supports the optimal level of anxiety for EWT? - AO1. (Factors affecting EWT).
Yerk's Dobson Law.
48
Outline Pickels study on the weapon focus affect + unusual objects (AO3). (Factors affecting EWT).
224 students in a watched a mockup robbery in a hairdressers. 4 conditions: High threat/weapon condition: Had a knife. Low threat/weapon condition: Had a handgun (low threat, but still a weapon). High unusualness condition: Had a chicken. Low unusualness condition: Had a wallet. Found that the weapon focus affect still played apart in the reliability of EWT. However, so did the unusualness of the object.
49
What is the WMM.
Explains how the STM is organised and how it functions. - 4 components.
50
Outline the role of the central executive.
- Allocates tasks to other slave systems. - Can only handle 1 piece of information at a time.
51
Evaluate the CE.
+ Baddeley - discovered p's found it difficult to generate lists of random numbers while simultaneously switching between pressing numbers and letters on a keyboard. Suggesting both tasks were competing for the CE limited capacity of 1. - Lack of clarity over the CE - some psychologist state it is vague and untestable.
52
Outline the phonological loop.
Deals with auditory information. Two subsystems: Articulatory control system - inner voice - a verbal rehearsal system. Phonological store - inner ear - lasts 1.5 - 2 seconds if not refreshed by the ACS. Capacity is how much information that can be spoken out loud in around 2 seconds.
53
Evaluate the phonological loop.
KF had poor STM ability for verbal information but he could process STM visual information suggesting the phonological loop had been damaged. Baddeley - world length affect - limited space for rehearsal in articulatory process.
54
Outline the visuospatial sketchpad.
Temporary storage of visual and spatial information and has a limited capacity.
55
Evaluate the visuospatial sketchpad.
Baddeley - p's had more difficulty doing two visual tasks (tracking a light and describing the letter F) than doing both a visual and verbal task at the same time - this increased difficulty is because both visual tasks compete for the same slave system. (Dual task performance). PET scans show that different brain areas are activated when doing verbal and visual tasks suggesting the the PL and VSS are separate systems.
56
Outline the episodic buffer.
Acts as a backup store which communicates with the LTM and the components of working memory.
57
Evaluate the episodic buffer.
Alkhalifa reported a patient with a severely damaged LTM who demonstrated STM capacity of up to 25 items for exceeding the capacity of the PL and VSS.
58
Evaluate the WMM.
Most of the evidence comes from brain damaged patients and they are not a reliable source of evidence - limited number of patients to study. Provides explanation/treatments for processing deficits, eg dyslexia A lack of clarity over the central executive - psychologists state that it is vague and untestable and some even state that it may even have separate components within it meaning the WMM hasn't been fully explained. Shallice and Warrington - KF had poor STM for digits but better when he read them himself - must be a STM for visual and auditory. Baddleey - supports the VSS as he found p's had more difficulty doing two visual tasks (tracking a light and describing the letter F) than one visual and verbal task showing that both visual tasks compete for the same limited space/resources. *Can use any evaluation from any of the 4 components to evaluate*
59
Outline what a cognitive interview is.
A more effective way of questioning witnesses to produce a more reliable recall of events.
60
What are the 4 components of cognitive interview. (Improving accuracy of EWT).
Report everything. Context reinstatement. Recall in reverse/change order. Recall from a different prospective.
61
Outline report everything. (Component of a cognitive interview). (Improving accuracy of EWT).
Encourage people to report any detail regardless of how trivial it may appear - can trigger other memories.
62
Outline context reinstatement. (Component of a cognitive interview). (Improving accuracy of EWT).
Eyewitnesses are asked to recall and re - create physical and psychological environment of the crime. - Based on context dependent memory which can trigger recall.
63
Outline recall in reverse/change order. (Component of a cognitive interview). (Improving accuracy of EWT).
Reduces the possibility that recall may be influenced by schemas/expectations.
64
Recall from a different perspective. (Component of a cognitive interview). (Improving accuracy of EWT).
View the scene how others present may have seen it. Reduces the influence of any schemas present.
65
Evaluate cognitive interviews. (Improving accuracy of EWT).
- Kohnken - carried out a meta analysis of 53 other studies and found that cognitive interview could elicit 34% more detail than a standard interview. - Cognitive interviews are time consuming to use in interviews and training police offers - can be less economical. * Can be linked to psychology within the economy* - Found that 63% more information was gathered by detectives trained in cognitive interviews compared to those who weren't.