Mental States Flashcards
(17 cards)
A person acts knowingly with respect to the nature of his conduct when
he is aware that his conduct is of that nature or that certain circumstances exist
M’Naghten test for insanity defense
provides for a defendant’s acquittal if he has a disease of the mind causing a defect of reason so that at the time of his actions he lacked the ability to know the wrongfulness of his actions or understand the nature and quality of his actions
Model Penal Code test for insanity defense
defendant lacked the substantial capacity to either appreciate the criminality of his conduct or conform his conduct to the law
specific intent crimes
BAM ACTS burglarly assault murder (1st degree) attempt conspiracy theft solicitation
Irresistible Impulse test for insanity
D lacks capacity for self-control and free choice
Durham Rule for insanity
D’s conduct was product of mental illness
attempt
specific intent to commit and substantial step beyond mere preparation
recklessly
state of mind where a person consciously disregards a substantial and unjustifiable risk that circumstances exist or that a prohibited result will follow, and the disregard is a gross deviation from the standard of care a reasonable person would follow
negligently
state of mind where a person fails to be aware of a substantial and unjustifiable risk, and the failure is a substantial deviation from the standard of care a reasonable person would follow
attempt
an act, done with intent to commit a crime, that falls short of completing the crime
conspiracy
- an agreement between two or more persons
- an intent to enter into an agreement
- an intent to achieve the objective of the agreement
- an over act (required in most states)
bilateral/common law approach to conspiracy
at least two parties in a conspiracy need to have criminal intent
unilateral/MPC approach to conspiracy
only one party in a conspiracy needs to have criminal intent
solicitation
counseling, advising, or commanding another to commit a crime, with the intent that the other person commit the crime
necessity
a defense where the defendant reasonably believed that the conduct was necessary to avoid some harm to society that would exceed the harm caused by the conduct
intent required for attempted murder
intent to kill
All attempt crimes are ________ intent crimes.
specific