Merger, acquisitions and alliances Flashcards
(51 cards)
strategic analysis foundations
- environmental assessment
- competitive positioning
- internal capability review
Strategic Option Generation
Growth Direction Options
Competitive Strategy Options
SBU Portfolio Management
How to conduct an environmental assessment?
- Apply PESTEL analysis to identify key external factors
- Focus on the most impactful trends affecting the industry
- consider how technological disruption creates strategic imperatives
How to tackle competitive positioning?
- use porters five forces to assess industry attractiveness
- determine current positioning on cost leadership vs differentiation spectrum
- identify the basis of current competitive advantage - if any
How to conduct an internal Capability Review
- apply resource based view to identify unique capabilities
- Use VRIO framework to assess sustainable competitive advantages
- Evaluate alignment between capabilities and strategic objectives
How to analyse Growth direction options?
- Apply Ansoff Matrix to identify potential growth paths
- Evaluate market penetration, market development, product development and diversification
- consider which options best leverage existing competitive advantages
How to analyse Competitive Strategy options
- Assess viability of cost leadership strategy
- Explore differentiation opportunities and unique value propositions
- consider focus strategies for specific market segments
- Evaluate sustainability of each competitive position
How to determine SBU portfolio management
- consider strategic options for different Strategic Business Units - SBUs
- evaluate relative investment priorities across SBUs
- assess synergies and resource sharing opportunities between SBUs
- determine resource allocation strategies - growth, maintain, harvest , divest
- consider corporate parenting advantages for portfolio of SBUs
types of strategic methods of partnership
organic development
mergers and acquisitions
strategic alliances
organic development - details
Where a strategy is pursued by building on and developing an organisation’s own capabilities
This is essentially the “do it yourself” method
advantages of organic development
Knowledge and learning can be enhanced
Spreading investment overtime - easier to finance
No availability constraints - no need to search for suitable partners or acquisition targets
Strategic independence - less need to make compromises or accept strategic constraints
Culture management - new activities with less risk of culture clash
Mergers and acquisitions - description
Mergers and acquisitions are concerned with the combination of two (or more) organisations
types of acquisitions:
Friendly
and
Hostile
Friendly acquisitions - definitions
- Friendly acquisitions are where the targets management recommend accepting the acquirer’s deal
Hostile acquisitions - definitions
- Hostile acquisitions are where the target’s management refuse the acquires offer
strategic motives for mergers and acquisitions - three ways
Extension - of the reach of a firm in terms of geography, products or markets
Consolidation - increasing scale, efficiency and market power
Capabilities - enhancing technological know-how - or other capabilities
financial motives for mergers and acquisitions- three reasons
- Financial efficiency - a company with a strong balance sheet - cash rich may acquire/merge with a company with a weak balance sheet
- Tax efficiency - reducing the combined tax burden
- Asset stripping or unbundling - selling off bits of the acquired company to maximise asset values
what is the acquisition process?
target choice -> negotiations -> completion and change of ownership -> integration -> results
what are the main criteria that apply for making a target choice in M&A
- Strategic fit - does the target firm strengthen or complement the acquiring firm’s strategy? (N.b it is easy to overestimate this potential synergy as negative synergies are often neglected)
- Organisation fit - is there a match between: managerial practises, cultural practises, staff characteristics
Haspeslagh and Jemison emphaise two key criteria:
- The extend of strategic interdependence - the need for transfer or sharing of capabilities and or resources
- The need for organisational autonomy - sometimes the distinctiveness of the acquired company can be an advantage, but sometimes it is problematic
what are the four approaches to integration: haspeslagh and Jemison
Absorption
Preservation
Symbiosis
Intensive care
Absorption integration
strong strategic independence and little need for organisational autonomy. Rapid adjustment of the acquired company’s strategies, culture and systems
Preservation integration
little interdependence and high need for autonomy. Old strategies, cultures and systems can be continued much as before
Symbiosis integration
strong strategic interdependence but high need for autonomy. Both the acquired firm and acquiring firm learn and adopt the best qualities from each other