Meta-ethical Theories Flashcards

1
Q

Naturalism

A

Values can be defined in terms of some natural property of the world

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Intuitionism

A

Basic moral truths are indefinable but self-evident

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Emotivism

A

Ethical terms simply evince approval or disapproval

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Naturalist arguments

A

BKEBFAPF

Bentham, Kant, Evolution, FH Bradley, Foot, Aquinas, Popper, Fletcher

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Bentham

A

(N) Goodness= pleasure, measure happiness using hedonic calculus- cognitive as we have criteria

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Kant

A

(N) Categorical imperatives that are right for entire group of people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Evolution

A

(N) Whatever gives evolutionary advantage is good

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

FH Bradley

A

(N) Universal and concrete duty through observation of society and our place in it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Foot

A

(N) “moral evil is a kind of natural defect”, draws on Aristotle’s observations of nature’s patterns, oak tree+ Kropotkin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Aquinas

A

(N) Can perceive morals from telos

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Popper

A

(N) Least pain is morally correct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Fletcher

A

(N) Agape is morally correct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Intuitionist arguments

A

MPR

Moore, Prichard, Ross

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Moore

A

(I) Naturalism commits naturalistic fallacy- good is “totally indefinable”, either recognise or not, “yellow”, Dylan Roof simply morally blind-> Warnock- simply sense of bewilderment, claiming 6th sense with no agreement on what it is

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Prichard

A

(I) Not only good indefinable, also the idea of “obligation”- reason collects facts and intuition chooses greater obligation= more developed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Ross

A

(I) Prima facie duties e.g. fidelity, reparation= obey greater duty

17
Q

Emotivist arguments

A

ASJHL

Ayer, Stevenson, Jung, Hume+Locke, (Warnock), (Wittgenstein)

18
Q

Ayer

A

(E) Cannot be verified analytically or synthetically-> Wittgenstein= language games have meaning to those playing

19
Q

Stevenson

A

(E) Deeply held beliefs

20
Q

Jung

A

(E) Collective unconscious ethics

21
Q

Hume+Locke

A

(E) Purely empirical

22
Q

Intuitionist counters

A

Warnock- Intuitionism is simply a sense of “bewilderment”

Wittgenstein- Anti-realist= Language can have meaning but only because we give it meaning