Meta-Ethics Flashcards

(46 cards)

1
Q

What is naturalism in ethics?

A

The view that moral properties are natural properties, features of the physical world.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What makes naturalism a form of moral realism?

A

It claims moral properties exist mind-independently.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Why is Bentham’s utilitarianism considered naturalist?

A

Because it equates goodness with pleasure, a natural property.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What kind of property is pleasure in naturalism?

A

A natural property of organisms like humans and animals.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What does utilitarian naturalism claim about ethical language?

A

It expresses beliefs about whether pleasure was maximized.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Why is utilitarian naturalism considered cognitivist?

A

Because it sees ethical statements as truth-apt beliefs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What does the statement ‘stealing is wrong’ mean in utilitarian naturalism?

A

It failed to maximize pleasure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What does Bentham argue about human nature and pleasure?

A

That we naturally find pleasure good.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How does Mill justify happiness as good?

A

By claiming happiness is our sole ultimate desire.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What does Hume argue about the ‘is/ought’ gap?

A

That factual statements don’t entail moral ‘ought’ statements.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Why is the leap from is to ought problematic for naturalism?

A

It lacks rational justification.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

According to Hume, where do ethical judgments come from?

A

From our feelings.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What does Hume’s view imply about cognitivism?

A

That it is false; ethical language expresses emotion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How can naturalism respond to Hume’s criticism?

A

By claiming values are a type of fact.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the Aristotelian view on goodness?

A

Goodness is flourishing (eudaimonia), a natural property.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What did Foot argue about ‘ought’ and ‘need’?

A

‘Ought’ functions like ‘need’, e.g., children need adults.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What does MacIntyre say about modern moral concepts?

A

They’ve become uprooted from communal human practice.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

How does Aristotelian ethics counter nihilism?

A

By reabsorbing ‘ought’ into ‘is’, grounding morality in facts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is Moore’s naturalistic fallacy?

A

It is a fallacy to equate natural properties with goodness.

20
Q

What is Moore’s open question argument?

A

Any natural definition of goodness leaves the question open.

21
Q

What kind of property is goodness for Moore?

A

A non-natural property.

22
Q

What analogy does Moore use for goodness?

A

Like the color yellow – known intuitively.

23
Q

What is intuition according to Moore?

A

A mental ability to access non-natural moral truths.

24
Q

Is intuitionism cognitivist or non-cognitivist?

A

Cognitivist – ethical beliefs can be true or false.

25
What evidence supports intuitionism?
Cross-cultural moral agreement.
26
What does Pritchard say about disagreement?
It depends on understanding and knowledge.
27
What does Mackie say about moral disagreement?
It reflects different cultural conditioning.
28
How does Mackie argue against moral realism?
He uses abductive reasoning from cultural differences.
29
What explanation does Mackie give for moral agreement?
Evolutionary drives and social needs.
30
What is Ayer’s verification principle?
A statement is meaningful only if analytic or empirically verifiable.
31
Why does Ayer reject non-natural moral properties?
Because they are unverifiable.
32
What does Ayer say about ethical language?
It is not truth-apt; it expresses emotion.
33
What does ‘stealing is wrong’ mean for Ayer?
‘Boo to stealing’ – an emotional expression.
34
What is Hume’s motivation argument as used by Ayer?
Ethical statements express desires, not beliefs.
35
How does Stevenson’s emotivism differ from Ayer’s?
He is not a verificationist.
36
What does moral nihilism claim?
That morality is pointless.
37
Why is anti-realism thought to lead to nihilism?
Because it denies objective morality.
38
How did Foot respond to Ayer post-WWII?
She argued that rejecting right/wrong could enable atrocities.
39
What does Ayer say about reactions to atrocities?
They are emotional reactions, not moral truths.
40
How can moral realism counter nihilism?
By claiming values are a type of fact verifiable through experience.
41
Why does Moore reject non-cognitivism?
Because ethical language involves disagreement.
42
What is the problem with emotivism and disagreement?
Emotions can't logically disagree.
43
What does Hare propose instead of emotivism?
Prescriptivism – ethical statements are universal commands.
44
Why is prescriptivism more plausible?
It explains moral reasoning and debate.
45
What is Mackie’s error theory?
Ethical language is cognitive but all moral beliefs are false.
46
Why does Mackie reject objective morality?
Because moral beliefs arise from social conditioning.