methods Flashcards

(129 cards)

1
Q

what are the 4 types of data

A

primary, secondary, quantitative qualitative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is primary data

A

data that was not present before the study began- interviews surveys observations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is secondary data

A

already exists, may have been produced for different reasons. newspapers diaries ect, quick fast and cheap

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is qualitative data

A

all non numerical data, sources, quotes ect, rich and more depth, MICRO, preferred by interpretivists

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is quantitative data

A

numerical form MACRO, official stats and league tables, preferred by positivists

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is validity

A

data is valid if it presents a true and genuine picture. it allows the researcher to get closer to the truth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what is reliability

A

different researchers using same method get the same results

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what factors impact on choice of research method

A

practical, ethical and theoretical

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what are some examples of practical issues

A

time and money, funding body, personal skills and social status, research opportunities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what are some examples of ethical issues

A

informed consent, confidentiality and privacy, protection, vulnerable groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

example of ethical breech

A

Laud Humphreys 1970 ‘tearoom trade’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

positive theory

A

sociology as a science, top down society, measure society’s impact on people, detached objective data, MACRO, quantitative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

interpretivist theory

A

reject sociology as a science, bottom up approach, social actors meanings, understanding behaviours, MICRO, qualitative data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

types of representative sampling

A

random sampling, quasi random/ systematic, quota

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

random sampling

A

chance, drawn out of hat- not all samples are large enough

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

quota sampling

A

need 20 males and 20 females- fill with people who fit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

quasi random/ systematic sampling

A

every nth person is selected

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

types of non representative data

A

snowball sampling, opportunity sampling

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

snowball sampling

A

key number of individuals suggest others to participate- lots of similar people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

opportunity sampling

A

choose those who are easiest to access- unlikely to be representative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

issues researching schools

A

different types of schools- undermines representation, heads may deny permission, data may be confident

schools are data rich environments and have a premade sampling frame

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

issues researching parents

A

P- not in one place, sample may be unrepresentative
E- some parents may only give informed consent if they benefit from research
T- manage impressions, exaggerate positives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

issues researching teachers

A

P- accessible, in one place, but may lack time to respond/ partake
E- confidentiality, incriminating evidence
T- unwilling to admit to bad behaviour, unrepetitive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

issues researching classrooms

A

P- closed setting, more control
T- hawthorn effect, student or teacher behaviour may change

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
issues researching students
P- easy access as they have to legally attend school, lots of records, may be reluctant to admit behaviour, time consuming E- vulnerable group, informed consent, report abuse, no harm T- power difference, hog limelight peer pressure undermines validity
26
comparative method
thought experiment, carried out in mind of sociologist, designed to discover cause and effect relationships. ethical and avoids artificially, can only be used to observe past events.
27
what does the comparative method entail
identify 2 groups of people alike apart from what we want to look at compare 2 groups, do their difference have any effect
28
lab experiments
scientists can examine cause and effect relationships, easy to replicate and identify patterns and trends. detached, reliable and valid. favoured by positivists
29
field experiments
natural environment, valid and realistic, less control, subjects are generally unaware they are being observed- ethically questionable
30
lab in context- harvey and slatin 1976
teacher expectations- found teacher are prejudice and label different social classes
31
lab in context- mason 1973
impact of positive and negative expectations, he found negative expectations had more affect than positive
32
issues regarding field experiments in education
E- deception of students, CPO, informed consent reliability-easy to repeat, broader focus- number of teachers opinions rather than just one, many elements to look at
33
concerns regarding lab experiments in education
E- working with young people, but most do not involve real children narrow focus- usually examines one aspect of behaviour P- teacher expectations, uncontrollable variables
34
field in context- rosenthal and jacobson 1967
labelling and SFP
35
what are questionnaires
list of predetermined questions, handed out, posted or online, they are a MACRO method and are preferred by positivists
36
closed questions
pre determined answers (ticky box) these produce quantitative data
37
open questions
own words, freedom and detail, these produce qualitative data
38
practical advantages of questionnaires
quick and cheap, no need to recruit and train people, easily quantifiable. Dewson, posted nearly 4000
39
questionnaires- reliability
standard and fixed yardstick, all asked the exact same question. easily repeatable, ne researcher present to influence
40
questionnaires- detachment and objectivity P
remove interviewer bias, preferred by positivists, detached
41
questionnaires- hypothesis testing
measure cause and effect relationships with ease, scientific approach- positivists
42
questionnaires- representative
large sample size, allows findings to be generalised
43
questionnaires- ethical issues
may ask intrusive or personal questions, but under no obligation to answer and anonymity is assured
44
questionnaires- practical problems
limited and superficial, brief. was it completed by who it says?
45
questionnaires- low response rate example
100,000 sent out but 4.5% returned. those who took the questionnaire may be very different to those who didn't- un representative
46
questionnaires- inflexibility
new areas of interest cant be explored, surface level answers
47
questionnaires- detachment I
interpretivists, sociology is not a science. no way to clarify meaning or probe deeper
48
questionnaires- lying forgetting and right answerism
saying what they think is right, respectable answers rather than the truth
49
questionnaires- imposing the researchers meaning
wording of questions , what questions are included- what is important
50
questionnaires methods in context- practical advantages
easily compared and gather data from different schools
51
questionnaires methods in context- sampling frames
ready made sampling frames, school already has lists of all pupils
52
questionnaires methods in context- response rate
higher, authority and students are used to completing survays
53
questionnaires methods in context- researching pupils
short attention span, limits and influences ability to gather info
54
questionnaires methods in context- operationalising concepts
turning abstract concepts into manageable form- make children understand
55
what are interviews
compromise between more structured research (questionnaires) and unstructured, in-depth methods (PO)
56
questionnaires methods in context- validity
unable to answer questions so may not be a good result
57
types of interviews
structured/ formal unstructured/ informal semi- structured group interviews
58
structured/ formal interviews
verbal questions, same questions same tone, objective
59
unstructured/ informal interviews
variety of questions and wording
60
semi- structured interviews
same set of questions, but interviewer can probe for more detail 'how do you mean' cicorel and kituse
61
structured/ formal interviews advantages
higher response rates, large sample, good for hypothesis testing, fast and efficient, reliable
62
group interviews
12-15 people, focus groups discuss topics and record views
63
structured/ formal interviews disadvantages
closed questions lack validity, may not be representative, more expensive than questionnaires, participants may be atypical, females may feel intimidated
64
unstructured/ informal interviews disadvantages
time consuming, unable to generalise as sample will be small. cannot be replicated or quantified, interviewer bias, hawthorn effect
65
group interviews advantages
help people not feel singled out, casual setting comfort, quicker as multiple people at once, more inclined to share- piggyback response
66
unstructured/ informal interviews advantages
rapport, comfortable and honest- tackle sensitive topics and hard questions. probe deeper and formulate new ideas, MICRO
67
group interviews disadvantages
may be reluctant to answer, intimidated by group setting. conform with dominant response. social status difference
68
advantages of unstructured interviews in education
overcomes power and status inequality, sensitive topics such as bullying made approachable, can clarify, rapport, space and time to talk, probe further
69
disadvantages of unstructured interviews in education
change answers for approval, cannot be standardised or replicated, long and can be too demanding for children
70
advantages of structured interviews in education
less time consuming than UI and less disruptive easy to replicate, more success than questionnaires as better verbal than literacy
71
disadvantages of structured interviews in education
power inequalities- seeking adult approval, parental permission, unable to clarify
72
what are the 4 different types of observation
non participant observation- researcher observes without taking part participant observation- researcher joins group while observing cover observation- 'undercover' real identity and purpose concealed overt observation- true identity is known and the subjects know they are being studied
73
overt non participant observation
observation with consent, sit with observation schedule and systematically record observations without pre empting what to look for
74
strengths of ONPO
repeatable, ethical, un obtrusive, researcher can stay detached- field work. valid findings
75
weaknesses of ONPO
can result in the Hawthorn effect and invalid data
76
participant observation- getting in
to study a group the sociologist must gain access to them, age nationality, class ect can impact their ability to get in
77
participant observation- staying in
danger of staying in the group- going native or getting over involved. over identifying leads to biased results, can also be over detached and not understand what they are observing
78
participant observation- getting out
it can be difficult as you are re entering society, loyalty to cause may lead to researcher being unwilling to disclose information
79
advantages of interviews as a social interaction
can relate to interviewee, personal questions, follow up questions, can culturally match interviewees
80
disadvantages of interviews as a social interaction
may change answers to gain approval, power inequality, interviewer bias
81
issues of CO
P-requires S to keep up an act, cover can be easily blown, cannot make notes. presence of new member can affect behaviour E-immoral to deceive people, immoral to partake in illegal activities to keep cover
82
advantages of PO
validity- what people say in interviews is not always true, po shows truth insight- best way to understand is to experience it (verstehen) flexibility- no fixed hypothesis, open mind practical- only viable method, rapport, reveal realities
83
disadvantages of PO
P- time consuming, personally stressful and demanding E- cpo is deceiving people and participating in illegal activities representativeness- small sample, no bias for generalisation, valid but cant generalise
84
quote about flexibility of PO
WHYTE 'i learned answers to questions i would not have had the sense to ask'
85
methods in context practical issues of structured PO
class room is well suited, short lessons, quicker cheaper but schools have many personalities
86
methods in context reliability of structured PO
range of classroom behaviour limits reliability
87
methods in context validity of structured PO
interviews lack in validity as it can only fit into a number of predetermined categories
88
methods in context observer presence of structured PO
presence of stranger can be off putting
89
methods in context practical issues of unstructured PO
schools are complex places and it may take weeks or years to understand functions, less disruptive than interviews but restricted by timetables ect
90
methods in context ethical issues of unstructured PO
pupils are vulnerable and may not give informed consent- poor reputation for school
91
methods in context validity of structured PO
overcome status differences, rapport however may be invalid as scared of researcher
92
what are official statistics
quantitative data collected by the government- births deaths, marriages, divorces, exam results, suicide, unemployment ect
93
2 ways of collecting OS
registration and official survays
94
registration
law requires parents to register their children at birth (marriages and deaths too)
95
official surveys
census or general house hold survey
96
practical advantages of secondary data
free source of huge amount of data, compels citizens to answer, patterns and treads and easy comparisons
97
practical disadvantages of secondary data
may not be available on some topics- definitions can change over time
98
representativeness of secondary data
large numbers, representative sample, hypothesis testing, stats are soft so less
99
reliability of secondary data
generally reliable, completed in a standard way but subject to human error
100
validity of secondary data
does it measure what it claims to? hard stats- yes soft stats- no
101
positivists and secondary data
valuable source of data, true and objective, test hypothesis comparative methods
102
marxists and secondary data
OS serves the interest of capitalism, the state is not neutral,
103
interpretivists and secondary data
regard OS as lacking validity, social construct and subjective
104
methods in context, practical issues of OS
gov already collects stats, cheap and readily available
105
methods in context, validity of OS
social construct, school may manipulate stats, undermining their validity
106
methods in context, reliability of OS
replicated by gov each year, easy comparison
107
methods in context, representativeness of OS
all state schools have to do one 3 times a year, virtually every pupil is seen
108
what is a document
any written text- personal diaries, gov reports, novels, letter, blogs ect
109
public documents
produced by organisations such as gov departments, schools ect. some of these may be available for sociological use
110
personal documents
includes letter, diaries, photo albums. first person accounts of events. 'the polish peasant in europe and america'
111
historical documents
personal or public, if studying the past this is usually our only source. parish records, census or parliamentary reports
112
assessing documents
scott puts forward criteria for a good document- authenticity, credibility, representativeness and meaning
113
assessing documents authenticity
are they who they claim to be, free from errors, missing pages?
114
assessing documents credibility
author sincere, accurate, eg politicians may inflate their importance with the intent of publishing
115
assessing documents representativeness
is the evidence typical, can it be generalised. 30 year rule, those who dont write may be un represented
116
assessing documents meaning
may need special skills to interpret, bias and subjective interpretation
117
advantages of documents
personal docs allow insight into social actors reality, rich source of qualitative data. cheap and time efficient, checking results against primary methods
118
what is content analysis
systematically dealing with documents, allows S to produce quantitative data
119
methods in context, documents, practical issues
publicly available as schools produce them to compete with others
120
methods in context, documents, ethical issues
few ethical concerns, public docs but there is a problem with using personal documents
121
methods in context, documents, reliability
systematic so researchers can draw direct comparisons
122
methods in context, documents, credibility
public docs give official picture of what happens- most positive light- makes them less valid
123
methods in context, documents, validity
insight into meanings held by teachers and teachers, more valid- but open to interpretation
124
what is a longitudinal study
sample of people over an extended period of time. research and collect data at regular intervals
125
7 up study
douglas, 5632 pupils born in the first week of march 1946. studied at 7 year intervals
126
positives of longitudinal studies
ethical as participants are aware, easy to compare and see patterns and trends, insight into life of children, long lasting effects, MICRO
127
negatives of longitudinal studies
long and costly, limited and small sample- cant generalise, could lose contact as participants can change their minds
128
case studies
examines a single case or place. good way to research social phenomena, not representative
129
triangulation
using more than one, typically 3 methods to study a case. methodological pluralism. enables a method to overcome the shortcoming of another