Micro Book 5 Flashcards
(16 cards)
5 characteristics of a perfectly competitive market
- many buyers and sellers
- goods are homogenous
- no barriers to entry/exit
- perfect knowledge
- firms ‘price takers’ not ‘price makers’
pure monopoly
when there’s one firm in the market with 100% market share
consumer surplus
the difference between the maxmimum price that consumers would be willing to pay and the price they actually pay
producer surplus
the difference between the minimum that sellers would be willing to accept and the price they actually receive
arguments against monopoly (6)
- productively inefficient
- allocatively inefficient
- x-inefficient (no incentive to cut average cost)
- deadweight loss of economic welfare
- monopoly profits
- restrict choice for consumers and lack incentive to innovate
arguments for monopoly (4)
- dynamic efficiency
- firms may reinvest profits to improve products
- can better exploit E.O.S
- natural monopolies
features of a monopolistically competitive market
- large number of firms in the market
- no barriers to entry/exit in the long run
- only normal profit can be made in the long run
- goods are somewhat differentiated
oligopoly
a market dominated by a few firms between whom there is conscious interdependence
features of an oligopoly
- many firms in the market
- some differentiation
- barriers to entry allow firms to make economic profit
- relative price stability
non-price competition (4)
- quality
- customer service
- after-sales service and warranties
- advertising/branding
price discrimination
when a firm is able to charge a different price for the same good or service in different markets
advantages of privatisation (5)
- revenue raised for the government (sale of assets and corporation tax)
- reduced public spending/borrowing
- promotes competition
- market forces promotes productive and allocative efficiency
- promotes enterprise culture
disadvantages of privatisation (4)
- risk of abuse of monoploy power
- short termism
- selling capital assets
- risk of selling assets too cheaply
regulatory capture
when regulators ‘side’ with the industry they’re meant to oversee
customer inertia
when customers remain with a provider because its easier than switching (or they forgot etc.)
working monopoly
a firm with more than 25% market share