Micro Year 2 Flashcards
(100 cards)
Why may a firm want to grow?
- A firm may wish to take advantage of economies of scale to decrease their long run average cost, bringing total costs down, thus increasing profit
- Firms may wish to control a greater share of the market, possibly giving them more monopolistic powers. This gives them greater influence over prices aswell as being able to implement artificial barriers to entry
- To increase profit
Why do some firms remain small?
- The size of the market can be a limiting factor, if a firm is operating within a niche market, the limited pool of potential consumers can be a limiting factor
- The firm may be localised, so opportunity for expansion is limited
- The owner of the buisness may be profit satisficing, so feel no need to expand. A sole proprietor may wish to stay in control of their buisness.
- Smaller firms may be unable to raise the necessary finance for expansion, either through limited retained profit or through limited access to credit
- To avoid diseconomies of scale
What is the principle agent problem? How can it be prevented?
A problem which arrives from a conflift between the objectives of agents (managers) and the principals (owners)
Owners/shareholders wish to acheive maximum profit, while managers may have other objectives in mind, such as market expansion or a greater work/life balance - managerial slack can occur. This arrises due to an information asymentry, where the agents are more aware of the effects of their actions than the principals, so agents are not held fully accountable.
It can be minimised by increasing manager monitoring, or by providing perfomance based rewards.
what is the distinction between public and private sector
organisations
private sector firms are privately owned by individuals or groups of individuals.
The public sector is made up of state owned organisations.
what is the distinction between profit and not-for-profit
organisations
profit organisations are often assumed to be profit maximising, where they wish to create the greatest surplus of revenue over cost
Not for profit organisations may have other goals, and wish to cover their costs but not to make profit. They may be charities with social/enviromental goals in mind.
What is organic growth?
A firm growing using its own resources (internally).
This is usually done by reinvesting retained profit back into the buisness to increase output
What is verticle intergration?
What are the two forms?
Verticle intergration is a merger between two firms in the same industry but at different stages of production.
It can be forward verticle intergration - where a supplier buys one of its buyers (buying a firm in a further stage of production, closer to the consumer)
It can also be backwards verticle intergration - where a buyer buys one of its suppliers (merging with a firm at a stage of production further away from the consumer)
What is horizontal intergration
A mmerger between two firms in the same industry at the same stage of production
What is conglomerate intergration
A merging of two firms in completely unrelated industries
What are the advantages of organic growth?
- Organic growth is low risk, as there is less chance of buisnesses defualting on loans or failing intergration
- it is less time consuming
- sole propiertors get to keep control over their buisness
what are the disadvantages of organic growth?
- it takes a long time to accumalate enough retained profits to grow organically, so buisness may miss out on opportunities to make more profit in a new market
- There may be limitiations on the possible extent of organic growth, so growth and profit therefore will be limited
What are the benefits of vertical intergration?
- vertical intergration may allow the firm to capture the profits from a different part of the supply chain
- It reduces supply chain uncertainty as they are in control of the pecursors and nexrt steps in production, so can gurantee the supply of factors of production
- Can control delivery directly so can reduce time ineffencies between the two stages in the supply chain
- vertical intergration an reduce the opportunities of growth of competitor firms, so increase market share and power. forward intergration can limit potential buyers of competitors products, backwards intergration can reduce the supply of competitors
what are the disadvantages of vetical intergration?
- A firm involved in vertical intergration may have limited knowledge in that particular stage of production - eg a motor manufacturing firm may have little knowledge about selling cars.
- Firms often over pay for a takeover compared to what the firm is actually worth
- firms may fall into managerial diseconomies of scale, as the extra layers of management needed to control the firm increase long run average cost
What are the advantages of a horizontal merger?
- It may allow for a reduction in average cost due to economies of scale
- It can reduce competition in the market, giving the firm more monopolistic powers
- It can allow one firm to buy the unique assets of a different firm, such as a new drug
- As the firms are in the same industry + stage of [rpduction, they will share knowledge and expertise so the merger is more likely to be successful.
What are the disadvantages of horizontal intergration?
Firms often over pay for a takeover compared to what the firm is actually worth
* firms may fall into managerial diseconomies of scale, as the extra layers of management needed to control the firm increase long run average cost
What are the advantages of conglomerate intergration
- By buying a firm in a different market, the firm reduces risk. The firm is now less succeptable to the booms and busts of that market
- A conglomerate can find it easier to expand as it is not limited by the size of just one market
- a conglommerate can use the profits from one industry to reinvest in another
- asset stripping
What are the disadvantages of conglomerate intergration?
- A lack of knowledge in the new industry can reduce perfomance
- if asset stripping occures, it benefits no one except the profit makers
- over paying for the original take over
- loss of jobs/consumer choice
What is a demerger?
A demerger occrues when a firm splits itself into two or more seperate parts, to create a new firm
What are the possible reasons for a demerger?
- Lack of synergies - when one part of the firm is having no real impact on the other, it makes no sense for managers to have to split their time between the two firms as this is inefficient and can lead to diseconomies of scale
- valuation of the seperate companies - the market value of the two demerged firms may be higher then when they are a single firm, this motivates shareholders to want a demerger as they will experience an apreciation in the value of their assets - this is called ‘creating value’
- focussed companies - by concentrating on a particular market, managers and firms can become more specialised, possibly leading to greater retained profit
What are the impacts of a demerger on businesses, workers and consumers
buisnesses - firms will benefit from a demeger if greater specilisation leads to greater effiinecies
workers - some managers may gain promotions as new senior leadship roles are created following a demeger. However, some roles may be lost so workers may lose their jobs
consumers - consumers will benefit if a demerger causes firms to cut costs and lower prices. This may not be the case if firms are profit maximising in a monopolistic market and keep prices stable
what is the definition, and the formula for the following:
* Total revenue
* averahe revenue
* marginal revenue
- total revenue (TR) is the total amount of money recieved from the sale of a good or service at any level of output. TR = Price X quantity
- average revenue (AR) is the average revenue recieved for selling one good or servicee. AR = TR / quantity
- Marginal revenue is the additional revenue recieved from selling one more good or service. This can be positive or negative, as if increasing price causes demand to fall at a faster rate (because PED is elastic), then selling an extra unit will cause TR to fall.
MR = change in TR / change in quantity
What are, and the formula for:
* Fixed Costs
* Variable Costs
* Total Costs
* Marginal Costs
* Average Fixed Costs
* Average variable costs
* Average Total costs
- FC - costs that do not vary with level of output
- VC - costs that do not vary with level of output
- TC - FC + VC
- MC - the change in total cost that arrises from producing one extra unit MC = Change in TC / change in Q
- AFC = FC / Q
- AVC = VC / Q
- ATC = TC / Q
What is diminishing marginal productivity?
As the input of a variable factor is increased, there is diminishing marginal productivity, as the additional output produced by each additional unit of output falls
At which point will demand be inelastic on a revenue curve in relation to MR?
As long as MR is positive, demand is price elastic, as the decrease in price leads to a proportionately larer increase in quantity sold. When MR is negative, demand is relatively price inelastic as a decrease in price leads to a relatively smaller increase in quantity sold When MR = 0, demand is unitary elastic