Microeconomics RWE Flashcards

(31 cards)

1
Q

(In)elastic PED

A

Drugs, Luxury Goods

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

(In)elastic YED

A

Bread, Luxury Goods (Cars / Houses)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Competitive supply

A

Farmers Planting carrots or potatoes as crops

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Joint supply

A

Petrol and Heavy oil (by-products)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Long Short-run

A

Electricity companies (power plants or electricity grid)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Short Short-run

A

Pressure washing company (cheap capital)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

(In)elastic PES

A

In the short-run tickets for a concert, supply of wheat globally as long you as willing to pay the current world market price

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Negative externality of production tax

A

Uruguay’s carbon tax of $167 per metric ton of CO2 as of April 2024 but was introduced in 2022 and allowed an average GDP growth from the previous 5 yrs of near 0% to increase to 4% due to more government revenue etc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Subsidy

A

UK government £265m into renewable energy source in 2021 which is estimated to provide 60,000 more jobs in the offshore wind sector by 2030 and was projected to attract around £20bn in private investment however has now in 2024 left them with a tighter budget so had to remove spending into disability transfer payments. It has also allowed more substitutes so a more competitive and elastic demand curve (decreasing price increases revenue and profit so investors look towards that) and due to renewable energy being better long term (social/political change and better technological efficiency whilst non-renewables are as efficient as they can be due to long time in market) so more investment and long-term structural change with subsidy.
Vienna €450m into Housing each year allowing approximately 60% nowadays of the population to live in subsidised housing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Max price

A

The G7 set a max price on Russian oil as of December 2022 in order to reduce their revenue as a sanction for invading Ukraine. In the short-term this decreased Russia’s oil revenue by around $150m daily but there were issues with compliance as alternative bypassing routes were produced

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Min price

A

Luxembourg had a minimum wage of €15.25 / hr in January of 2025 for unqualified workers (even higher to around €18 / hr for qualified workers) which although it increased disposable incomes, poverty rate still increased over this time (potentially due to demand for labour decreasing so more poverty as less people have jobs)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Buffer stock scheme

A

India’s food corporation of India have a buffer stock scheme on wheat and rice which reduced cereal inflation from 16% - 8% in the time that the buffer stock scheme was released and decreased rural inequality as rural incomes rise but needed high costs to keep high stocks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Tradable Pollution Permit scheme

A

The European Union emission trading scheme (EU ETS) caused a reduction in CO2 emissions of 47% in 15 years (2005-2020) whilst firms’ revenue had no significant change. All the environmental long-term benefits ; At the start there was an over-allocation of permits not only diminishing the effectiveness of the system but also causing windfall profits as companies had more than they needed so just sold (over time this has been fixed by slowly adjusting (MPC moving closer and closer to MSC allowing time for producers and not affecting profits)). There are also many industries that aren’t in the scheme - in 2023 less than 25% of airline emissions were caught in the scheme highlighting the large costs of punishing and maintaining and monitoring

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Public-Private Partnership

A

PPP in Africa with Bridge International Academies (BIA) providing over 450 low cost private schools throughout Nigeria, Kenya and Uganda without heavy government intervention (in between of Keynes and Classical). This has allowed to break poverty trap and hence economic growth and development due to 200% better grades on same international exams so more skilled jobs etc. Lack of government intervention is huge for these countries since LIC/MICs so don’t have money to spend. High bureaucracy can cause higher than expected costs and more complex network so less efficient as well as possibly easier to have corruption hidden (although less money flow then big infrastructure projects so although higher chance less money in corruption). Fiscal Capacity for LICs is lower so less cost is better

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Screening

A

Health insurance companies have low information on their consumers and so pay a higher price in order to cover the riskier individuals. However this increases the price for everyone and so the MPC is greater than the MSC (more to the left). In order to solve this India in 2018 used a huge database from the SECC to identify more at risk individuals and those with less risk. This allowed low income individuals to purchase health insurance (increasing by over 25% the amount of people using health insurance in India) and hence decreased health-induced poverty by 15% in this time. However errors with inclusion and exclusion meant some who needed or fell into poverty in the time after the SECC had it’s latest report weren’t included (100 million people) whilst some who weren’t in poverty were included

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Signalling

A

In the organic food industry, producers/farmers know more about how they produced their crop than consumers and so can say that it is organic when in reality it isn’t (MPB is less than MSB so they are under consumed). This was solved by audits from third parties which put on organic certification labels (USDA Organic or EU leaf label). This lead to an increase from around $25b to around $125b in organic food sales in around 20yrs although this increased price by a minimum of 20% in that time for all organic goods but some even to 100%

17
Q

Moral Hazard

A

Deductibles in the US with High-deductibles health programmes of deductibles up to $1000-$5000 for individuals and $2000-$10000 for households which after this deductible amount the insurance paid. However this caused unfair treatment for low-income individuals/households who didn’t have the money for this

18
Q

Negative Externality of Consumption tax

A

in 2014, Mexico implemented a 1peso per litre tax on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages (SSB) in order to better the health of their country by decreasing sugar consumption, it also raised government revenue (generating 5b pesos - $250m in the first year) and tackled the obesity crisis in Mexico as they are one of the countries with the largest obesity rate. However, the tax was effectively regressive since low income consumers paid a higher proportion of their income on SSBs so the tax affected them more than high income individuals (20% of the poorest Mexicans spent 5% of their income on SSBs from the WB in 2017) which increased their tax burden - this led to a smaller than predicted increase in their HDI from 8.04 to 8.08 in 7 years

19
Q

Corporate Social Responsibility Pros

A

Patagonia employ environmental and ethical practices like have employee satisfaction through very high levels of engagement and retention as well as employing sustainable practices which although led to more consumer trust and brand loyalty (and possible even higher profits than profit max in the long-term as environmental sustainability is more at the forefront of consumers minds so demand for these goods will increase) but also led to more public scrutiny due to higher expectation since their brand is built on these practices as well as higher costs so consumer surplus decreased (although community surplus increases as it accounts externalities)

20
Q

Perfect competition

A

Wheat farmers in the EU as small relative to the size of the industry and wheat is a very homogeneous good yet more significant sunk costs so barriers to entry/exit and no perfect knowledge but closest since also in a monetary union so easier communication

21
Q

Monopolistic competition

A

Casual Dining Restaurants have slightly differentiated goods (between cuisines or intracuisine) meaning they are price makers but there is large competition and relative small berries to entry/exit (although advertising costs are relatively high) creating almost 12,000 Italian restaurants in the UK

22
Q

Monopoly (Legal barriers acting as a barrier to entry)

A

Pfizer had a patent for the active ingredient in Viagra in 1996 allowing them to invest heavily in clinical trials and R+D whilst other couldn’t or it wasn’t worth it due to the high sunk costs and slim chance of gaining profits of this allowing them to have huge market share whilst also increasing profits until 2013 (EU) and 2020 (USA) when the patent expired where they had no legal power and so other companies flooded the market meaning now they don’t have enough market share to be considered monopoly power

23
Q

Natural Monopolies

A

The US railroad industry in the early 20th Century experienced high levels of competition but due to the extremely high barriers to entry/exit, profits collapsed as no single company could maintain pricing power and so many went bankrupt by the 1930s. Needing government intervention, to ensure one firm was not making profits and implementing price gauging (increase the price when consumers need it the most) since transport is so vital and a very PED inelastic good, the government intervened, ensuring the price now is at a price that maximise community surplus so is allocatively efficient

24
Q

Formal collusions laws

A

The Sherman Antitrust act making formula collusion illegal in the US

25
Formal collusion
OPEC (Organisation for petroleum exporting countries) still undergo formal collusion to artificially raise prices (or not undergo a price war) due to there not been any international law
26
Tacit collusion
Tesco price matching Aldi (the price leader)
27
Price war being negative
Saudi Arabia engaged in a price war with Russia 2014-2016 which although they managed to find an agreement for led to many large US companies already changing their supply chains due to instability and lack of trust leading to a decrease in total profits for OPEC (as Russia and Saudi Arabia are in it) although Saudi Arabia gained short-term profits this was completely countered in the long-term
28
Restricting Mergers for Oligopolies
Blocked merger of AT&T and T-mobile in 2011 due to them having a combined market share of around 75% by the DoJ and the Federal Communication Commission (FCC) - it would reduce competition. T-mobile became more competitive due to a $3b breakup fee from AT&T allowing them to re-invest (dynamic efficiency) whilst also allowing lower prices for consumers due to more competitive pricing and an arguable faster 5G rollout due to competition and dynamic efficiency. However, this caused short-term uncertainty and led to AT&T shifting strategy and led them to be less innovative as they sought to expand their business in different areas so 5G could've been rolled out faster if they were focused on this industry rather than expanding into other industries
29
Regulatory Organisations for Oligopolies
Ofgem in the UK regulate gas and electricity markets via price capping or fair rate of return which set the APL that are normal for a competitive market or even unbundling (firms selling multiple products in one bundle) like Microsoft with Word, Excel, PowerPoint which makes each less expensive but doesn't allow small businesses focusing on specific parts to compete or even set up product regulations
30
Nudge Theory
The Save More Tomorrow scheme in Brazil aimed to increase the amount of savings (Leading to economic growth through the Harod-Domar model) which was an opt-out approach (inertia bias) which led to individuals automatically paying some of their salary towards their savings (gradually increasing with their salary but still allowed them to feel the increase in salary) whilst being low cost and led to more financial security through an estimated 25% increase in savings but behavioural fatigue from always having money drained out of their salary could lead to more opting out (overcoming the inertia bias) and although it increased savings, inflation or a loss of job would very quickly nullify these savings so doesn't actually amount to much
31
Monopoly (Main example not viagra ...)
'Gilead Sciences' developed 'Solvadi', a cure to hepatitis C with a >90% success. However originally they priced it at $84,000 per treatment course in the US, 2013. This led to only the rich being able to afford it (inequality) . Due to the huge positive externality of consumption of this cure (decrease strain on healthcare services which we have seen in the pandemic how minimal strain we need healthcare services to be to better health of population). This led to a need of intervention, Egypt bargained with Gilead to sell at below $900 per treatment in 2015. the WHO also licensed this treatment via the 'Medicines Patent Pool' (an organisation that tries to give necessary medicines to low and middle income countries) to lower income countries. This 10million people to be treated by 2020 globally however Gilead's revenue greatly decreased to annually under $1b (2020 also) compared to over $30b in just 2015. This poses the question of healthcare but disincentivises innovation as companies as soon as they make a breakthrough are barred from making profit on it even if they spent a lot on R+D as if it's life changing then it will be passed to everyone (not representing the risk and investment cost).