Mid Term 1 Flashcards

(74 cards)

1
Q

They Lay the foundation for attitude and personal preferences

What we base our crucial life decisions on

Define right or wrong or good and bad

A

VALUES

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Three types of cognitive style

A

Knowing
Planning
Creating

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Structure, plans, agendas, outlines, preparation, procedures

Resistant to change
Intolerant of Ambiguity
Overwhelmed by Chaos
Can’t handle illogical situations

A

Planning Style

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Creativity, risk-taking, innovations, novelty, spontaneity

Resistant to Structure
Ignores Facts and Data

A

Creating style

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Facts details, logic, rationality, validity, proof

Possibly slow to make decisions, resistant to innovation, Intolerant of multiple views

A

Knowing Style

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Two Types of Locus Control

A

Internal Vs. External

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

I am the master of my own fate

A

Internal Locust of Control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Its up to the gods or stars alignment

A

External Locus of Control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Core Self Evaluations

A

Self Esteem
Self Efficacy
Neuroticism
Locus of Control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Feel valuable

A

Self Esteem

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Feel Confident

A

Self Efficacy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Emotionally inStable

A

Neuroticism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Locus of Control

A

In control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Justification process we go through
Bander has 8 ways that we can justify to ourselves to relieve our cognitive dissonance

  • Moral Justification
  • Euphemism labeling
  • Advantageous Comparison
  • Displacement of Responsibility
    -Diffusion of responsibility
    -Dehumanizing
  • Attribution of blame
    Minimizing/denying/distorting consequences

These are why it is important to make the right decision first so our brain does not go down these alley ways

A

Moral Disengagement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Ability to identify our emotions
- I wanted to explode on a consultant when I was professionally disrespected

Ability to identify others emotions
- I could tell the individual did not take it well when they received constructive criticism from their team members

Ability to control our emotions
- I had to hold my toungue when one of our team members was getting berated

Ability to Respond Appropriately
- We had to continue the briefing review with composure and not let our emotions get the best of us

A

Four dimensions of Emotional Intelligence (Short Answer)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Not all moral issues are created equally

  1. Magnitude of Consequences – sum of the harms to
    victims of an act (an act harming 1,000 people vs. 10;
    killing a person vs. minor injury)
  2. Social Consensus – the degree of social agreement that
    an action is good/bad (bribe in Mexico vs. the U.S.)
  3. Temporal Immediacy – length of time until the onset of
    the consequences (reducing retirement benefits of current
    retirees versus 50-year-olds)
  4. Proximity – feeling of nearness (social, cultural,
    psychological, or physical) for victims of the act
    (layoffs in one’s work unit vs. distant plant)
  5. Concentration of Effect – number of people
    affected by an act of given magnitude (cheating
    an individual out of a $100 has a more
    concentrated effect than cheating the IRS)
A

Moral intensity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Concept of having or taking ownership of an ethical issue

Ability to take a good intention and follow through with it

Moral Ownership – sense of responsibility for an
ethical situation; unwilling to let a situation pass
without at least considering some action to set it right
* Moral Efficacy – confidence one has in addressing an
ethical situation in a favorable/positive manner
* Moral Courage – ability to overcome threats or fears
for engaging in ethical behavior; courage to persist
through despite adverse personal consequences
(Intent – Behavior Gap)

A

Moral Potency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Moral Value resides in duty, maintaining social contracts, and keeping commitments

A

Conventional Level

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Moral Value resides in external factors and consequences, not people or relationships

A

Pre-conventional Level

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Moral Value Resides in commitment to freely selected standards, rights, and duties

A

Post-Conventional Level

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What kind of stressor is this?
- work overload and lack of control

A

Time stressor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What type of stressor is this?
- role conflicts
- issue conflicts
- action conflicts
- Difficult people

A

Encounter Stressor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What kind of stressor is this?
- Unfavorable working conditions
- Rapid change

A

Situational Stress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What kind of stressor is this?
- Unpleasant Expectations
- Fear of upcoming event

A

Anticipatory stressors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Physiological reaction and cognitive labeling
Schactor and singers 2 factor theories
26
Two people looking at a roller coaster with two entirely different reactions.
Physiologically may be experiencing the same thing but they are thinking in a different way. To help deal with the stress we want to cognitively reframe it and put it into a more positive light
27
Look at figure 2.3
Breaks things up into a quad chart of urgency and importance. Tend to neglect things that are less urgent but still important.
28
Inverted U shape non linear graph that shows the different levels of stress and the middle ground
stress experiencing in job performance
29
What are the four types of stressors?
Time Encounter Situational Anticipatory
30
Brain and Spinal Column
Central Nervous System
31
Connects rest of body with brain and spinal column
Peripheral Nervous System
32
See bear, info goes in, output is run
Somatic System (motor senses)
33
The things that happen automatically like adrenaline purges. Sometimes Autonomic can be dysfunctional
Autonomic System
34
More soothing system
Parasympathetic
35
Less soothing more aggressive
Sympathetic
36
What are the 8 Attributes of Supportive Communication?
1. Congruent - Genuineness, honesty, authenticity foundation of positive relationships 2. Descriptive not evaluative - Evaluative places judgement and makes label - Descriptive describes things objectively with data and focuses on solutions - avoid accusations and present data 3. Problem Oriented not Person Oriented - This is the issue vs. you are the issue 4.Validating - enhances self esteem - Respectful vs. Superiority - Flexible 5. Specific not global - Avoid extremes and absolutes - focus on behaviors 6. Conjunctive not Disjunctive - connected to previous statements - bilateral topic control 7. Owned not disowned - taking responsibility for statements - Use of first person 8. Supportive Listening - Advising - Deflecting - Probing - Reflecting
37
Used well: if you are being honest and authentic Not well: if you are dishonest or mismatch thinking
Congruence
38
Used Well: if you avoid accusations/present data/focus on solution/Describe Objectives Not well if: you blame others/Emotion driven not data driven
Descriptive (Not Evaluative)
39
Used well: if you focus on the problem not the person
Problem oriented not person oriented
40
Used well: if you are enhancing self esteem, being respectful and not superior
Validating
41
Used well if you are avoiding extremes
Specific not global
42
Used well if you are connecting things to previous statements
Conjunctive not Disjunctive
43
Used well if you are using first person and taking responsibility
Owned not Disowned
44
Used well if you are advising, deflecting, Probing, Reflecting
Supportive Listening
45
What are the Five Dimensions of empowerment?
Self Efficacy Self Determination Personal Consequence Meaning Trust
46
The sense of self confidence
Self Efficacy
47
I have a choice in the matter
Self Determination
48
We can have a favorable impact for whatever we are trying to accomplish
Personal Consequence
49
I value what I do personally
Meaning
50
Sense of security or belief that I will be treated fairly
Trust
51
What are some ways that shape empowerment?
You cannot force someone to be empowered Each individual needs to decide for themselves A person can be empowered even though the context is not right or nobody acknowledges their work Empowerment leads to cooperation
52
What do you do when a subordinate comes to you, has a problem and delegates it to you?
Try and give it back to them so they can work on it and then come back with recommendations
53
What are the five strategies of handling a conflict? (Short Answer)
Forcing Avoiding Compromise Collaborating Accommodating
54
Getting your way Issue Importance: HIGH Relationship Importance: LOW Relative Power: HIGH Time Constraints: MED-HIGH Assertive: HIGH Cooperative: LOW
Forcing
55
Don't Upset the other person Issue Importance: LOW Relationship Importance: HIGH Relative Power: LOW Time Constraints: MED-HIGH Assertive: LOW Cooperative: HIGH
Accommodating
56
Reaching an agreement quickly Issue Importance: MED Relationship Importance: MED Relative Power: EQUAL Time Constraints: LOW Assertive: MED Cooperative: MED
Compromising
57
Solve the Problem Together Issue Importance: HIGH Relationship Importance: HIGH Relative Power: LOW-HIGH Time Constraints: LOW Assertive: HIGH Cooperative: HIGH
Collaborating
58
Avoid Having to Deal with Conflict Issue Importance: LOW Relationship Importance: LOW Relative Power: EQUAL Time Constraints: Med-High Assertive: LOW Cooperative: LOW
Avoiding
59
Problem I can Present ;) Enjoy this one honey
When you do our meal prepping, I cannot eat gluten, and It makes me feel like my freedoms have been hijacked
60
No matter how much you dislike the individual you need to....
disentangle the person from the issue
61
similar to stress, a little bit of conflict can be good! What are some ways small bits of conflict can be good? (as long as it is issue focused)
It can.....Stimulate innovation Encourage personal involvement Spark creativity
62
Four Stages of Team Development IN ORDER (Short Answer)
1. Forming 2. Norming 3. Storming 4. Performing
63
team members are faced with the need to become acquainted with each other. Relationships must be formed and trust needs to one established.
Forming
64
Team is faced with creating cohesion and unity, differentiating roles, Identifying expectations for members, and enhancing collaboration.
Norming
65
Team is faced with disagreements, counter dependence, differing viewpoints, and the need to manage conflict, challenges include violating team norms and overcoming group think. Focusing on process improvement
Storming
66
The team is faced with the need for continuous improvement, innovation, speed, and capitalizing on core competencies. Sponsoring team members new ideas, orchestrating their implementation, and fostering extraordinary performance are needed from team leaders
Performing
67
What are the two main roles a leader or member can play?
1.Task facilitating 2. Relationship building
68
Coming to a conclusion on outcome. Result based.
Task Factilitating
69
Enhance harmony between the team. Help people feel good about being on the team.
Relationship building
70
Things that impede the team from moving forward and hinder progress
Blocking roles
71
Specific measurable aligned realistic and time bound goals
Smart Goals
72
Everest Goals
73
Disastrous decisions a team will make when everyone is in agreement with one another solely based on a preference from an influential individual
Group think
74
Disastrous decisions a team will make when everyone is in agreement with one another solely based on a preference from an influential individual
Group think