Midterm Flashcards
(105 cards)
What is communication?
The relational process of creating and interpreting messages that elicit a response. An act of communication has three parts: creating the message, the message’s characteristics, and the interpretation of the message and the response
Name at least two ways that people can get a message across
Speaking (Verbal Communication), which can happen in a variety of settings such as interpersonal, family/groups, organizations, public/mass communication.
Shared expressions like sounds (sighing) or facial expressions.
What are two parts that messages have? Explain both.
Content Level - The level of communication that addresses the topic
Relationship Level - Level of communication that addresses how people think and feel about each other.
How do the two levels of communication differ from each other?
The content level solely looks at what the message is about while the relationship level is focused on each person and their feelings and thoughts.
Theories are what? What does that mean?
Theories are a set of systematic, informed hunches.
This means that theories are a set of observations and evidence that explains how things work, it is an educated guess based on evidence.
True or False: Every message has a single meaning
False: Messages are polysemic, which means , they may have different meanings that can change over time.
True or False: The meaning of messages is static over time.
False: Messages MAY become static over time due to differences in context, people, or words may have different meaning from when the message originated.
True or False: Theories should be testable.
True: Theories should be testable, they can change over time, hence why it is important to continuously test to see if they are still applicable.
They also allow us to examine the similarities and differences between them.
Define Epistemology
The study of the origin, nature, method, and limits of knowledge.
What is epistemologies relevance in the field of communication.
It’s relevant because the interpretive scholars claim truth is socially constructed through communication and language.
How do objective scholars (i.e., behavioral scientists) understand the concept of truth?
Objective scholars believe truth can be arrived at through unbiased observation.
How do interpretive scholars understand the concept of truth
Interpretive scholars believe there are many truths and this depends on lived experiences and contextual elements.
How do theoretical purposes (goals) differ between objective and interpretive scholars
Objective scholars / theories try to create generalizable explanations and explain the process that lead to certain conclusions.
Interpretive scholars / theories try to create a guide towards explanation and explain the motivations that lead people to come to certain conclusions.
Objective theories must have predictive ability, what does that mean?
Predictive ability is being able to predict possible outcomes of human behavior using observation and evidence.
Objective theories must be parsimonious, what does that mean?
Parsimonious refers to the idea of simplicity.
What is the rule of parsimony (i.e., Occam’s razor)?
The idea when given two plausible explanations, the simplest should be accepted (Occam’s Razor).
Objective theories must be falsifiable, what does that mean?
Falsification refers to the idea that hypothesis must be able to be proved wrong. (Karl Popper: do not look for confirmations; irrefutability is not a figure of a theory)
Objective theories must be practical, what does this mean?
The theory is useful for everyday life. Theories that are helpful and influential allow people to use their insight and learn from their wisdom.
Interpretive research must provide clarification of values, what does this mean?
The theorist who is doing the testing is defining their values and ideologies.
Interpretive research must provide a new understanding of people, what does this mean?
Theorists are trying to find a new understanding of behavior by analyzing uniquely human activity and finding patterns.
Interpretive research should have aesthetic appeal, what does this mean and what is the similar value to aesthetic appeal in objective theory?
Aesthetic appreciation refers to the attractiveness of a theory (not physically, but rather: is it simple? Does it make sense/explain the questions we have? Is it elegant? Is it catchy?)
While aesthetic appreciation is of value to interpretive theorists, the most similar value to objective theorists would be relative simplicity.
Interpretive research should aim to reform society, what does this mean and why?
It should generate change and impact society. Because interpretive scholars believe many aspects of society are socially constructed, interpretive research can challenge what’s accepted by society, raise questions, and offer alternatives to currently accepted ideals
Socio-Psychological Tradition
Uses systematic observations and controlled experiments to find quantitative variables that explain how people communicate and what causes certain reactions
Cybernetic Tradition
Using systems and figuring out how information flows through those systems. Theorists don’t just look at technological systems, but also family systems and media systems such as social media.