Midterm Flashcards
(95 cards)
Why did the Articles of Confederation fail?
Didn’t allow tax collection
All states needed to amend constitution
No executive branch
No interstate commerce
No judicial branch
Why did the Founders fear demagogues?
Young nation = politically unstable, demagogue rise to power = large threat
Demagogues will not consult the interests of their country over their ambitious desires
They believed uniformly that some men, though elected by the people, would be temperamentally incapable of serving the public interest under the Constitution. Therefore, they offered Congress the remedy of impeachment and removal from office.
Executive Privilege
the ability of the president to bar documents from Congress or the public
Key indicators of Authoritarian Behavior (How Democracies Die)
- rejection of (or weak commitment to) democratic rules of the game
- denial of the legitimacy of political opponents
- toleration or encouragement of violence
- readiness to curtail civil liberties of opponents, including the media
what is a populist?
they are anti establishment politicians to claim to represent the voice of the people but wage war on what they depict as corrupt and conspiratorial elite, deny the legitimacy of established parties, tell voters the existing system has been corrupted or rigged, promise to return power to “the people”
How can party leaders keep authoritarians out of power?
“Distancing” and isolating extremist voices. When they enter as legitimate candidates they must agree to work together but hold the survival of democracy above all else
What were the constitution’s biggest compromises?
- Small states v. big states - representation? - bicameral legislature that emulated European systems BUT no “higher” or “lower” house, one favoring small states, one favoring large
Virginia v. New Jersey plans → Connecticut compromise
⅗ Compromise for slave representation - The election of the executive and other parts of the position
Veto is allowed but needs to have the possibility of override, electoral college instead of popular vote, term limits → four-year term to avoid monarchy - Commerce
Is America more a democracy or republic? Why?
Republic - the founders feared majoritarian rule which is the founding philosophy of democracy. We have elements of both but by simply having a representative system and a lack of practices like popular voting for the president, we are primarily a republic
The chartering of a Constitution that protects the minority = republic
What were two early tests of democracy in history? Did the nation pass them?
The election of 1800 → first time power was handed to the opposite party in a civil way, proved democracy was stronger than partisan interests
Alien and Sedition - defied all claims of liberty, subjective view on what is a “threat” or “malicious,” no gov’t criticism is allowed
What is judicial review and why is it important?
Established in Marbury v. Madison
Allows the federal court to determine the constitutionality and legitimacy of actions made by the executive and legislative branches
An important check/balance - prevents any branch from overstepping their power
What does the term, “legislative/executive interdependence” mean?
Checks and balances are complex by design, the legislative and executive branches cannot function without each other, the legislative makes and funds policy while the executive enforces it, legislation has to approve executive appointments, each branch retains its ability to control the actions of the other
What does the institutionalization of Congress mean and why was it necessary?
Describes the growth/development of Congress into a more complex, professional governing body over the years. As the country has grown over the years, the institutionalization of Congress was necessary.
When were the powers of committees at their height and when did the decline of committees importance begin? What happened to Howard Smith and why is he important?
Height: Late 1920s following Joseph Cannon’s Tenure as speaker.
- Thomas Reed established the House Rules Committee which Cannon later took advantage of to get the policies he favored onto the floor
- Canon became so powerful that Congress rebelled against the speakers and kicked him out, which is when the power shifted to committees.
- The decline of committees occurred years later, in 1972-74, Democratic reformists were tired of powerful chairmen as they felt they were not representative of Congress nor voters, so many chairs were thrown out, power went back to the Speaker
Describe power of Speaker versus committee chairs and committees through Pelosi.
Give examples when Congress tried to retake powers. Did Congress succeed? If not, why not?
- War Powers Act of 1973: reaction to Vietnam. It checked and limit the power of the president by requiring him to notify Congress within 48 hours of sending troops into a hostile area –> has never been successfully employed
- tried again in 2001-2002 in Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Libya
How has Congress changed?
- 1789 - small gov’t
no committees, philosophy was gov’t should do as little as possible - Today: Not just reps. and senators
8500 house staffers, 4800 senate staffers
17 senate committees 70 subcommittees, 23 house committees 104 subcommittees
Agencies like the CBO, CRS, GAO
How have the powers of Speakers and chairs changed over time?
Has changed over history of who has more influence
Today speakers are powerful and chairs are weak
Committees generally have more expertise
What are some Pros and Cons of Institutionalization of Congress?
Pros:
- maintain connections with constituents through increased number of staff
- established committees within Congress, allowing for more specialization and attention to different issues
Cons:
- Congress full of professional politicians who may care more about maintaining power/fame rather than serving their country
- more complex, vast, bureaucratic institution, therefore making it less efficient
- more polarized
Why are the jobs of party leaders more difficult today than 50 years ago?
Congress is now a full time job
Parties are more ideologically different and much more diversity of thought within parties - compromise is difficult (freedom caucus v. Kevin McCarthy)
Trying to make party-wide goals and maintaining a good image
Collective action dilemma - How can leaders mobilize majorities to legislate for the public good when it is in the self-interest of lawmakers to focus on their own electoral needs? Free-riders
Speakers are incredibly powerful, they are typically reelected as long as their party controls the House. Recently, speaker elections are much more contentious in the House
What’s the difference in the ways in which Republicans and Democrats choose Committee Chairs? (SEE DAVIS CH.14)
Both tend to choose “middlemen” but Dems. tend to choose someone a little left of middle for the party and Republicans a little right
Dems give more importance to seniority, diversity (race, gender, etc.), and geographic location
Reps. give more importance to previous experience, party loyalty, and fundraising ability
What’s the conditional vote theory and how does it apply to the House of Representatives today?
Conditional Vote Theory: A strong, centralized leadership best suits a governing body when the members of one party share the same party views and the opposing party has different views.
The two parties have historically been more coherent, so we have seen recent Speakers act according to the conditional party government theory (more assertively).Now, however, the Republican Party is not unified and this theory does not apply.
Do you believe it’s better for Congress to have powerful Speakers or powerful committee chairs (no right answer!)
Powerful Speaker:
pros:
- provide strong leadership and direction (set agenda, prioritize bills)
- negotiate with senate and President to ensure bills get passed
- increase efficiency through regulating debate and streamlining bill process
cons:
- lack of bipartisan, favors party
- limited debate limits other perspectives, especially on minority side
Powerful Committee Chairs:
pros:
- expertise in areas they work may lead to more informed decisions/policy
- more influence on legislation
- strong chairs may work across party lines, lead to bipartisan compromise
cons:
- more power to many different chairs may slow the legislative process
Job of the House Speaker
Presiding officer of the House, certifying passed measures, administering oath of office, counting and declaring votes, appointing members to committees, second in line to the presidency
Elected by house members on 1st day of new congress every 2 years
Does not serve on committees and does not debate on the floor
Job of Majority Leader
Majority party selects leader every two years on 1st day of congress
Organizes legislative plans, schedules legislation to go to the house floor, consults with party members on legislation, works to advance the party
Usually does not serve on committees and does not debate on the floor