Midterm Flashcards

(83 cards)

1
Q

Conflict

A

An expressed struggle between two
interdependent parties who perceive
incompatible goals, scarce resources, and
interference from others in achieving their
goals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Expressed struggle

A

Communicative manifestation
Triggering event
* Ex. Clean house is destroyed in 15 minutes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Interdependence

A
  • Mutual activity
  • Strategic Conflict: conflict in which parties
    have choices
  • Mutual Interdependence: locked into a
    position whether you want to be or not
    – Most relationships move back and forth between
    degrees of interdependence and independence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Perceived Incompatible Goals

A
  • Sometimes just incompatible
  • Incompatibility
    – Want same thing; but it is thought there is not
    enough to go around
    – Want different things; but disagree on which one
    – Procedural; agree on goals but conflict is how to
    get there
    – Substantive; disagree on goals themselves
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Perceived Scarce Resources

A
  • Currency of some kind
    – Attention, affection, recognition
  • PAB=DBA
    – The power that person A has over person B is
    equal to the dependence of person B on person A
  • Statements are often a reflection that we feel
    someone has more power
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Interference

A
  • Generally feel conflict involves some kind of
    blocking/hinders another ones goals
  • Often do not understand motivations for
    decision
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Destructive Conflict

A
  • Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse
    – Critical Start up
    – Defensiveness
    – Stonewalling
    – Contempt
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse: Critical Start Up

A
  • Role of criticism in start up of relationship is a
    strong indicator
  • Women tend to criticize more
  • “You always” and “You never”
  • “I” statements and limit issue
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse: Defensiveness

A
  • Protect ourselves from pain
  • Warding off attack
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse: Stonewalling

A
  • Withdrawal from Interaction
    – “I am not here”
    – Men stonewall more than women
    – Refusal, holding back, afraid of being influenced,
    angry
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse: Contempt

A
  • Contributes to destructive conflict
    – Puts oneself on higher plane
    – Mockery or put down
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Defensiveness: Evaluation vs. Description

A

Judgmental and evaluating versus neutral and
non-blaming

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Defensiveness: Control vs. Problem Solving

A

Insist on X or shut down versus we can figure it
out

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Defensiveness: Strategy vs. Spontaneity

A

Manipulation versus being free of deception and
communicating honestly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Defensiveness: Superiority vs. Equality

A

Talking down to someone versus asking how they
are seeing things

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Defensiveness: Certainty vs. Provisionalism

A

Dogmatic and inflexible versus asking how WE can
make this happen

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Stressful Drama

A

Blow up: insist on getting own way

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Escalatory Spirals

A

Continues to circle: more and more damaging

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Avoidance Spirals

A

– Lessened interaction
– Covert expression

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Attack/Withdrawal

A

– One brings something up and other says “just
busy”
-finds excuses to “withdrawal”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Reciprocity of Negative Emotions

A

– Negativity met with more negativity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Retaliation

A

– Don’t get mad get even

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Deustch Conflict: Verdical

A
  • Parallel: It exists objectively and is perceived
    accurately
    -conflict is valid and rooted in differences
  • Ex. Sue and Bill both agree that their conflict
    arises from the fact that Sue does not wish to
    make a formal commitment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Deustch Conflict: Misattributed

A
  • cause of conflict is objectively or innaccurately assigned to the wrong source
  • Ex. Bill blames Sue’s ex-partner Dan for their
    problems
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Deustch Conflict: Latent
* Conflict should be occurring but it is not * Ex. Couples have real differences in values but pretend the differences do not matter
26
Deustch Conflict: Displaced
* Someone might have an objective reason for conflict and perceive it exists, but has perceptions of the conflict that are off target * Ex. Bill (who is uncertain of their future) starts to sulk. Sue confronts him about his attitude. The real issue is not being discussed
27
Deustch Conflict: False
* People disagree but have no objective basis for their displacement. Often times a result of a misunderstanding
28
Perspectives on Conflicts: Worldview
* Shapes conflict resolution * Cognitive, ethical, and perceptual frames of an individual
29
Worldview continued...
1. A view of what is real and important in the universe * 2. A view of how people and objects are supposed to relate to each other * 3. A view of what part of the universe is more valuable than another * 4. A view about how you know what you know * 5. A view about how people should act
30
Negative view of Conflict
1. Harmony is normal and conflict is abnormal – Conflicts alternate with harmony * 2. Conflict constitutes a breakdown in communication – Designating it as a breakdown assumes that communication does not occur * 3. Conflict and disagreements are the same thing – Conflict is more than disagreement 4. Conflict is a result of personal pathology – Participants often described as sick, neurotic, etc. * 5. Conflict should never be escalated – Sometimes conflict needs to be escalated * 6. Conflict interaction should be polite and orderly – Can be chaotic and confusing, not just neat 7. Anger is the only emotion in conflict interaction – Can be many emotions: sadness, loss of emotional bonds, etc. * 8. A correct method for resolving conflict can be prescribed – Fight, vote, litigate or appeal – Divides us in winners and losers
31
Positive Views of Conflict
* 1. Conflict is Inevitable – Fact of Life * 2. Conflict serves the function of bringing problems to the table – Makes conflict clearer – If occurs more than three times, it’s not about he content * 3. Conflict often helps people join together and clarify their goals – People often do the same thing the same old way until conflict happens * 4. Conflict can clear out resentments and help people understand one another – We have to take in and understand someone else’s perspective
32
The Lens Model of Conflict
* Any conflict can be viewed through – 1. Communication behaviors – 2. The perception of those behaviors Each person has a lens that gives that person a particular perspective: view of self, view of others, view of relationship
33
Attribution Theory
* 1) What we do is the cause of circumstances (External Factor) -late to work because of traffic * 2) What others do is caused by who they are (Internal Factor) -late to work because of disorganization * Ask questions – Consistency – Consensus – Distinctiveness – Control
34
Danger of Single Focus
*often focus on only one aspect of issue * Intent of ones actions/words does not equal impact * Often focus on what our opponent does and comment on their intentions * We often speak of our own intentions
35
Gender Filters
* Gender versus Sex * 1. Same sex platonic relationships men tend to use more competitive strategies * 2. Adolescent girls tend to use indirect means of aggression Argument: men and women are similar as well * No meaningful differences
36
Social Learning Theory
Individuals assumed to learn to be male or female based on communication and observation -modeling or immitation of what they have seen, not experienced
37
Gender and Self-Esteem
* Both experience slumps in self-esteem, but at different times * Females more likely during adolescence * Males more likely in mid life * Do males have more power culturally?
38
Cultural Filters
* Individualist – focused on self Individual oriented – Direct – Explicit * Collectivist – focused on group harmony Indirect – Non-confrontational – Implicit
39
TRIP: Topic
* Content: What is this conflict about? * Addresses – What to do – What decisions to make – Want two different things – Want same thing, but not enough resource
40
TRIP: Relationships
Relational Goals * Who we are in relation to each other – Define how we want to be treated – The amount of influence each will have with the other * I thought we were best friends * I want to feel respected
41
TRIP: Identity/facework
* Who am I in this particular interaction * Specific desire to maintain one’s self identity * Brown – Positive Face: social acceptance and approval – Negative Face: free will and power – Messages are categorized to the degree they are direct or indirect and threaten positive or negative face * Cultural issues and face saving * Face saving attempts – Claim unjust intimidation * Declare others are taking advantage * Seek support from outside parties – Refuse to step back from position * Fear of looking foolish by changing – Suppress conflict issues * Refuse to admit that a conflict exists as it feels events are out of control
42
TRIP: Process
* What communication process will be used? – Stay up and talk? – Take a vote? – Give each other equal time? * Quickness leads to efficiency, but also suppresses creative and alternate solutions
43
Overlapping Nature of TRIP Goals
* 1. Not all types of goals emerge in all disputes – Ex. Keep conflict going but not change how we are engaging * 2. Interests and goals overlap with one another and differ in primacy – Ex. Concerned for all, but not at the same level * 3. Identity and relational issues are the “drivers” of dispute, they underlie topic and process issues – Do you think this is true? * 4. In a serious dispute, topic-only solutions are rarely satisfying to conflict parties – Ex. Want an apology * 5. Conflict parties often specialize in one kind of goal – Ex. Often those in power tend to focus conflict on the topic * 6. Goals may emerge in a different form – Ex. Relational goals are acted out as topic goals
44
What is meant by identity and relational issues are the “drivers” of dispute
When it is said that identity and relational issues are the “drivers” of dispute, it means that conflicts often go deeper than just the surface-level disagreement (the topic). Instead, the underlying reasons for the dispute are related to how individuals perceive themselves (identity) and their relationships with others (relational issues).
45
Prospective Goals
identify perspective and evaluate before the interaction/conflict
46
Transactive Goals
Discovered through conflict itself, shift and shaped by the ongoing communication and exchange between parties in the conflict.
47
Retrospective goals
– Emerge after conflict is over – Explains why we did what we did – Face saving after conflict, hindsight is given, reflect and adjust goals to prevent future conflict
48
Why is it important to have clear and collaborative goals
1) Main times people engage too forcefully with others at the beginning of a conflict because we are afraid our ideas will not be heard * 2)Focus on behaviorally specific goals * 3) Statements orient toward the present and future – Discusses what can be done now instead of what can be done in the past * 4) Goals recognize interdependence – If we operate from concern for self as well as others, agreements serve parties for the best * 5) Collaborative goals recognize an ongoing process – An ongoing goal is to remain committed to the process of constructive conflict
49
Power Denial
– People deny exercising power in a relationship when in fact they really are exercising power – Some people are simply uncomfortable with the concept of power
50
Why do people deny power?
* People are cautious * Want to please you * “Open door policy” does not work
51
4 Attempts to Deny Power: Deny that you communicated something
* “I am under a lot of pressure” or "you misunderstood me" * To say you are not responsible for your communication lets you exercise control while denying you are not in charge of your communication -claims miscommunication
52
4 Attempts to Deny Power: denying the message was communicated
* “I forgot I said that” * “Did I say that?” * -avoiding accountability
53
4 Attempts to Deny Power: denying a message was communicated to a specific person
* “Oh, I was not directing that to you.” * “I am just thinking out loud” * Ex. If just one person here would do their job!
54
4 Attempts to Deny Power: denying what was said applies to the situation
* “I am used to being treated unfairly, I probably always will” * Denies that one feels treated unfairly * Perhaps withdraw from participation and helping (“see how they do without me”) * Take information and expertise with them * “Was not saying anything bad about the team, just stressed out from working”
55
Relational Theory of Power
**Power is a product of a relationship * Always interpersonal * Based upon one’s dependence on resources and currencies * PAB=DBA – Power of person A over person B is equal to the dependence of person B on person A * In relationships, power can shift and be fluid
56
Integrative Power
* Assumes all parties in a dispute have power * Focuses on “Both/And” perspective * Relational view: how all conflict parties see power
57
Resource Control
* Often with one formal organization * Sometimes called obligation or legitimate * Economics not the only type, but is common currency
58
Interpersonal Linkages
* Currencies dependent on interpersonal contacts * With whom you associate: network * “Who you know”
59
Communication skills:
* Speak persuasively * Lead a group * Bring people together * Ability to form bonds: love, affection, nurturance * Must be valued building face to face communication
60
Expertise
* Special skills * Many professions * Sometimes used as a control tactic
61
Power Imbalances
Whether we have a sense of high power or low power, both can create feelings of discomfort
62
Assessing Relational Power
1. What are your sources of power * 2. What are the other party’s sources of power * 3. How does the other see you and his/her sources of power
63
Things to do when you feel low in power:
Focus on Interdependence: both parties needed and deserve recognition * Calm Persistence * Active engagement – 1. Speak up – 2. Make clear values – 3. Stay emotionally connected – 4. State differences and let others do the same
64
Conflict Styles
Patterned responses or clusters of behavior that people use in conflict
65
Nature of Styles
* By the time you are an adult, your basic orientation toward conflict has been established * Doesn’t mean we cannot develop other styles * Five Basic Styles: Rahim
66
Avoid or Engage?
* Integrating, Compromising, Dominating=Engagement * Obliging and Avoiding=Avoidance * Depends on situation what is optimal
67
Avoidance (useful)
* Changing and avoiding topics Useful: * Open communication not part of relationship – Relationship Culture * Do not want to invest energy * Costs of confrontation too high * Not learned collaboration
68
Dominating
* Aggressive uncooperative behavior * Pursuing own concerns at expense of others * Compete without destroying others, can be seen as a commitment * Might even enjoy the “energy” of the confrontation
69
Compromise
* Intermediate style * Some gains and some losses * Moderately assertive and cooperative * Shared power * Both win or both lose
70
Obliging
* Same as accommodating * Prefers cooperative harmonizing approach; not individual needs * Set aside concerns in favor of pleasing others * Might be good for bigger cause or group * Martyr (puts others before themselves) * Don’t realize: : just a pattern
71
Integrating
* Collaborating * High concern – Own goals – Goals of others * Enhancement of relationship * Constructive
72
Harmful Actions
Verbal aggressiveness/abuse Bullying Violence Sources (learned, patriarchal, lack of communication skills)
73
Avoidance (problematic)
Problematic: * May signal you do not care * Impression you can not change * Conflict will heat up * Not working through perpetuates that conflict is “bad” * Allows pretending there is no mutual influence * Preserves conflict for later explosion
74
Avoidance (culture)
* We are trained culturally how to deal with conflict * Collectivist: talk about healing and making amends * Individualist: “You don’t have to take that”
75
Destructive Domination
* Verbal Aggression: striving for individual win * Often leads to mirrored behavior
76
Threats
* Source in position to administer punishment * Source appears willing to invoke punishment * Recipient must see outcome as negative * Different from – Warning: might happen but not a threat – Promise: source controls outcome and is seen as positive * Can damage a relationship
77
Co-dependence
* Linked to obliging – What one thinks or feels is dependent on what another does – Not know what they feel
78
Integrating (best communication skills)
* Descriptive and disclosing * Solicit reactions * Concessions
79
Integrating (problematic)
* If only style might feel imprisoned by it * Is it worth investment if relationship commitment is low * More verbally skilled can be manipulative * Might accuse other of being uncaring if they use another style * Psuedo integrating: (gain at others expense)
80
Leveling
* Leveling – When you do X – In situation Y – I feel Z
81
Cautions about styles
* Culture * Focus on self reports – See ourselves as solving the problem – See others as being controlling or aggresssive * Not consistent across relationships * Styles evolve within relationships * Relationship history * Perception of self and other
82
Interaction Dynamics
* Interlocking interaction: two or more determine outcome * Based on views of other intent and actions * Two patterns: – Complementary * Styles that are different but mutually reinforcing – Symmetrical * Tactics mirror one another
83
What happens when people are “stuck” in a style?
They tend to approach all conflicts in the same way, regardless of the situation or the needs of the people involved. This can lead to harm in relationships because different situations require different approaches.