Midterm Flashcards
(83 cards)
Conflict
An expressed struggle between two
interdependent parties who perceive
incompatible goals, scarce resources, and
interference from others in achieving their
goals
Expressed struggle
Communicative manifestation
Triggering event
* Ex. Clean house is destroyed in 15 minutes
Interdependence
- Mutual activity
- Strategic Conflict: conflict in which parties
have choices - Mutual Interdependence: locked into a
position whether you want to be or not
– Most relationships move back and forth between
degrees of interdependence and independence
Perceived Incompatible Goals
- Sometimes just incompatible
- Incompatibility
– Want same thing; but it is thought there is not
enough to go around
– Want different things; but disagree on which one
– Procedural; agree on goals but conflict is how to
get there
– Substantive; disagree on goals themselves
Perceived Scarce Resources
- Currency of some kind
– Attention, affection, recognition - PAB=DBA
– The power that person A has over person B is
equal to the dependence of person B on person A - Statements are often a reflection that we feel
someone has more power
Interference
- Generally feel conflict involves some kind of
blocking/hinders another ones goals - Often do not understand motivations for
decision
Destructive Conflict
- Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse
– Critical Start up
– Defensiveness
– Stonewalling
– Contempt
Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse: Critical Start Up
- Role of criticism in start up of relationship is a
strong indicator - Women tend to criticize more
- “You always” and “You never”
- “I” statements and limit issue
Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse: Defensiveness
- Protect ourselves from pain
- Warding off attack
Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse: Stonewalling
- Withdrawal from Interaction
– “I am not here”
– Men stonewall more than women
– Refusal, holding back, afraid of being influenced,
angry
Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse: Contempt
- Contributes to destructive conflict
– Puts oneself on higher plane
– Mockery or put down
Defensiveness: Evaluation vs. Description
Judgmental and evaluating versus neutral and
non-blaming
Defensiveness: Control vs. Problem Solving
Insist on X or shut down versus we can figure it
out
Defensiveness: Strategy vs. Spontaneity
Manipulation versus being free of deception and
communicating honestly
Defensiveness: Superiority vs. Equality
Talking down to someone versus asking how they
are seeing things
Defensiveness: Certainty vs. Provisionalism
Dogmatic and inflexible versus asking how WE can
make this happen
Stressful Drama
Blow up: insist on getting own way
Escalatory Spirals
Continues to circle: more and more damaging
Avoidance Spirals
– Lessened interaction
– Covert expression
Attack/Withdrawal
– One brings something up and other says “just
busy”
-finds excuses to “withdrawal”
Reciprocity of Negative Emotions
– Negativity met with more negativity
Retaliation
– Don’t get mad get even
Deustch Conflict: Verdical
- Parallel: It exists objectively and is perceived
accurately
-conflict is valid and rooted in differences - Ex. Sue and Bill both agree that their conflict
arises from the fact that Sue does not wish to
make a formal commitment
Deustch Conflict: Misattributed
- cause of conflict is objectively or innaccurately assigned to the wrong source
- Ex. Bill blames Sue’s ex-partner Dan for their
problems