midterm Flashcards
(86 cards)
clinical barriers that may impact patient outcomes
self image, underestimate importance of hearing health, financial limitations, limited access to healthcare, unrealistic expectations, motivation, perceptions of society and medical professionals responses
what do we mean by perceptions of society? what is included under this?
attitudes of immediate family members, attitudes of friends and cultural norms, practices or ideologies
how can attitude of friends impact hearing health
if there are bad experiences that are shared with out patients that could impact how they view audiologist or how they view getting help regarding their hearing
2 important aspects to understand in terms of cultural norms, practices or ideologies
familism : sense of obligation, the family’s needs are more important than the individual
stigmas : feeling like HL is something to hide because it reflects negatively on the individual
we talked about how medical professionals responded to their patients in regard to hearing, what conclusion can we make about this as a barrier
-many patients will have drop out rates after receiving advice about HL
-the response from medical professionals have shown influence on the patients decisions regarding amplification
-there are higher adoption rates in countries where professionals actively recommend hearing amplification solutions
how are audiologists potentially creating barriers
clinical setting barriers (parking, office convenience, office appearance), quality of experience barriers (wait times, ease of making appointments, staff knowledge), communication mismatch, technocentric barriers (only on product based solutions), focusing only on high end technology and lack of awareness (not discussing comorbidities)
patient centered care (PCC)
allowing the patient to be in the center of care and making decisions together with the audiologist
-conduct a communication needs assessment and develop an individualized AR plan
-use both objective and subjective components
elements of PCC
listen to and respect patients perspective, involve the family, reinforce shared decisions, prioritize free flow of information and demonstrate empathy
individualized audiologic rehabilitation plan specifics include ….
amplification/HAT, perceptual training, communication strategies and communication behaviors
family centered care (FCC)
allowing the family and the patient to work together with the audiologist to create a plan
-include CP input and incorporate the CP in the AR plan
communication partner (CP) self report questionnaire examples
significant other assessment of communication, significant other scale of hearing disability and significant other profile
-assessing the 3rd party disability of the CP
how can FCC be included into the AR plan
promote understanding of the HL impact, opportunities to participate in goal development and incorporating the CPs needs into rehabilitation goals
decision aid
an organizational tool designed to systematically review a set of treatment options
-reviewing all potions allowing for conversations with the patient to help them decide on which treatment options they will begin
the structure of the decision aid
gives information based on the type of option it is with boxes that the patient can check off for if they want to learn more information about it or if they know that they do not want to learn more about it
-include additional pages with more in depth information regarding the various types of treatment options
technocentric model vs. audiologic rehabilitative model
technocentric model entailed that HAs or technology are the only aspect of the management plan while the rehabilitative model stresses the importance of having additional aspects involved beyond technology
compare the components involved in the technocentric and audiologic rehabilitation model
technocentric : audiometry, HAs, HA orientation, real ear verification and accessories
audiologic rehabilitation model : patient story, self assessment of auditory wellness, technology, communication strategies, speech/visual perception training, peer support and validation
multi-faceted rehabilitation approach
this gives patient centered benefits because it focuses on including expectations, rehabilitative process, habituation and involving the whole family
under the multi-faceted rehabilitation approach, how are patient expectations managed
objective/subjective factors are used, explaining habituation and limitations due to auditory damage, helping the patient recognize amplification is just one component and also explaining effective treatment involving the whole family
audiologic rehabilitation (AR)
addresses the challenges and needs of individuals with HL, helping them adapt to and manage their condition effectively
-this should reflect whole person healthcare
-personalized based on the specific needs and preferences of each individual
overarching goals of AR
-reduce deficits related to loss of function, activity limitations, participation restrictions and quality of life
-enhance conversational fluency
-recognize HL imposes a multi-dimensional loss of function (impacts body, mind and social aspects)
when we aim to reduce hearing related limitations, what are the components of this
looking at function, activity, participation and quality of life
-all impacting and impacted by HL
-can all lead to lack of participation and can begin to impact quality of life
technology can help improve activity limitation however, it may not always improve this. given that, how can we assess if HAs are benefiting the patient
observing aided speech both in quiet and in noise, add a component of no visuals as well
how does rehabilitation minimize the consequences of HL
usage of technology, enhanced listening skill training, communication strategies, environmental adaptation, emotional/psychological well being and advocacy/access
quality of life and auditory wellness are important aspects to look at for our patients, how can we observe these aspects
through questionnaires