Midterm Flashcards

1
Q

What is critical thinking

A

Critical thinking is the ability to think clearly and rationally about what to do or what to believe

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is an argument?

A

A set of statements (a conclusion supported by premises)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the types of statements?

A

Statements: sentences that are used to make an assertion - “spot is a good dog”

Interrogative sentences: sentences that ask a question - “is spot a good dog?”

Imperative sentences: sentences that issue a command - “be a good dog, spot”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

If it is grammatical to add _____ to the beginning of a statement, then it is a statement

A

“it is true that…”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is standard form of argument?

A

Number and display each premise on a separate line.

Display the conclusion on the last line.
Remove all premise indicators.

Remove all conclusion indicators or replace with a simple conclusion indicator like “therefore”.

Rewrite premises and conclusion so that they are complete, explicit, and clear.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Validity

A

an argument is valid if and only if it is logically impossible for the premises to be true while the conclusion is false

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Soundness

A

valid + all the premises are true

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are invalidating counterexamples

A

a logically possible scenario in which the premises are true, and the conclusion is false

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Modus Ponens (mode that affirms)

A

If P, then Q.

P.

Therefore Q.

P and Q are variables that stand for statements, any argument with this argument form is valid, no matter which statements “P” and “Q” are.

Note: the order of the premises does not matter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Modus Tollens (mode that denies)

A

If P, then Q.

Not Q.

Therefore, not P.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Hypothetical syllogism

A

If P, then Q.

If Q, then R.

Therefore, if P, then R.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Disjunctive syllogism

A

P or Q.

Not P

Therefore Q.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Dilemma

A

P or Q.

If P, then R.

If Q, then S.

Therefore, R or S

P or Q.

If P, then R.

If Q, then R.

Therefore, R.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Reductio ad absurdum

A

Aim: to show that some statement S is true

Assume that not S is true

Show that not S leads to a contradiction or other absurd (clearly false) claim

Conclude that S is true

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

True or false: Denying the antecedent is a valid argument form, what is it?

A

False

If P, then Q.

Not P

Therefore, not Q

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

True or False - Circular arguments are valid

A

True, A circular argument is an argument where the conclusion is also a premise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Tautologies

A

statements that are true no matter what - “Therefore, either it is raining here now, or it is not raining here now”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

True or False Tautologies are not valid

A

false

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

True or False - Arguments with inconsistent premises are valid

A

True, Its valid because there will never be a situation where all the premises are true, and the conclusion is false

There must be a way for all the premises to be true and the conclusion false for argument for be invalid

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What are inconsistent premises

A

premises that can’t all be true at the same time “it’s raining here now” “it’s not raining here now”

21
Q

Necessary conditions

A

X is a necessary condition for Y just in case X is required for Y

  • The first thing is required for the second thing
  • No second thing without first thing
22
Q

how to have counterexamples to claims about necessary conditions

A

Prove that a necessary condition is false

Y obtains but not X

(EXAMPLE)
completing all the exercises is necessary in order to pass the course
Counterexample: Becca missed an exercise and passed with a B.

23
Q

Sufficient conditions

A

X is a sufficient condition for Y just in case X guarantees Y
- If X obtains, Y obtains too

24
Q

Counterexamples to claims about sufficient conditions

A

show that X is not a sufficient condition for Y, find a case where X obtains but not Y

25
what is the relation between necessary and sufficient conditions (x and y)
X is a necessary condition for Y Y is a sufficient condition for X
26
Logical possibility
a state of affairs is logically possible just in case it is not contradictory
27
Nomological possibility
The laws of nature include the true laws discovered by physics, biology and other sciences
28
A state of affairs is necessary...
...just in case the state of affairs not obtaining is impossible
29
Everything logically necessary is...
...nomologically necessary
30
Implicit premises
Are premises that are not explicitly stated Aka, hidden assumptions, hidden premises, suppressed premises When we put an argument in standard form, we must state implicit premises explicitly
31
What is an inductively strong argument
an invalid argument whose conclusion is very likely to be true given that its premises are true think: How likely is it that the conclusion is true given that the premises are true?
32
True or false - An inductively strong argument must have true premises
False, Inductive strength has to do with how much the premises support the conclusion and not with the actual truth or falsity of the premises and the conclusion
33
True or false - An inductively strong argument is valid
false
34
Deductive argument
an argument that is intended to be valid - Doesn't actually have to be valid
35
inductive argument
an argument that is intended to be inductively strong - Doesn’t actually have to be inductively strong, just needs to be INTENDED to be inductively strong
36
Can a valid argument be made invalid by adding premises?
NO!
37
what does it mean that inductive strength is defeasible
An inductively strong argument can be made weaker by adding premises
38
What are the differences between valid arguments and inductively strong arguments?
Valid Argument (V) It is logically impossible for the premises to be true while the conclusion is false - (I) It is logically possible for the premises to be true while the conclusion is false (V) Being valid is all or nothing - (I) Being inductively strong is a matter of degree (V) Validity is not defeasible - (I) Inductive strength is defeasible
39
In argument mapping, what does each node stand for?
a statement
40
what do arrows show in argument mapping
Arrows are used to show that statements are linked Statement at head of arrow supports the statement at the tail of arrow
41
What are co-premises
The premises work together to support the conclusion, neither supports the conclusion in isolation Depicted in argument map with y-shaped arrow
42
What are independent premises
Each premise independently supports the conclusion, Depicted with V-shaped arrow
43
Multi-layered arguments
an argument in which some premises are supposed to be supported by other premises
44
intermediate conclusions
Premises that are supposed to be supported by other premises
45
main conclusion
The conclusion at the end of a multi-layered argument
46
How many sub-arguments are there in a multi-layered argument?
A multi-layered argument has many sub-arguments as it has conclusions and intermediate conclusions combined
47
How do you draw an argument map for a multi-layered argument map?
Identify the conclusion (the main conclusion) Identify the main argument Identify any sub arguments
48
Affirming the consequent is an ______ argument
invalid, If P, then Q Q Therefore, p