Midterm 2 Flashcards
Three types of interviews
- standardized (structured, formal)
- unstandardized or non- standardized
- semi standardized
Assumptions of standardized interviews:
- questions are comprehensive enough that they will elicit all pertinent information about the topic
- questions are worded so that participants clearly understand what the interviewer is asking
- the meaning of each question is identical for every subject
Assumptions of unstandardized interviews
- interviewers do not know what all the necessary questions are
- people’s linguistic capacities are not commensurate
- participants will not necessarily find equal meaning in like worded questions
Assumptions of standardized interviews
- interviewers know what some of the important questions are
- there is some commensurability between individuals
- interviewer must standardize questions in the language/ vocabulary of the participants and use probes to explore novel emic concepts
Types of interview questions
- deriving questions to ask - creating schedule (order, content, style)
- essential, extra, throw- away, probes
- wording of questions
- grand tour and mini tour
- common problems with questions
Deriving questions
- research questions guide question formulation
- we start with a broad outline comprised of major categories we would like to explore
- our questions relate to the different categories
- we get these categories from a thorough search and reading of the literature
Order, content, style
- structure of schedule will depend upon traits of your participants
- structure includes the order or sequence of questions, phrasing, level of language, adherence to subject matter
- factors influencing structural choices we make include: participants level of education, ethnicity, age, and gender
Essential questions
- exclusively concern Central focus of study
- designed to elicit specific info
- distributed throughout schedule
Extra questions
- designed to confirm responses to essential questions (rewording of essential)
- power of repetition (why interview not like convo)
Throw away questions
- at the beginning of the schedule for developing rapport
- way cool off participant when breached sensitive topic
- demographics, general info, setting pace
Grand tour
- the point for participants to take is on a tour of some facet or feature of their lives
Mini tour
- probe during grand tours
Double- battled question
- avoid, asking two questions in one
Thomas and Znaniecki
- the Polish peasant in Europe and America
- Chicago school
- requested written life histories from who they were studying
Zorbaugh
The Gold Coast and the Slum
- got informants to document their participants observations just like the researcher
Nygren and Blom
- got narratives from social work students dealing with problems experienced
- example narratives solicited by ethnograpjers
Mass observation archive in U.K.
- ability literate volunteers to produce native accounts of everyday life around them
Gamst
- documents with locomotive engineers
- published (ie rule books) and unpublished (ie correspondence)
Zerubavel
- documents and time in hospitals
Latour and Woolgar
- biomedical laboratory field study and document centrality written outputs in scientific world
Douglas
- era where official record keeping and counting are primary sources of knowledge
- audit society
Sudnow
- productions of normal crimes in a public defenders office
- certain people who have task creating documents, and this effort is subjective and interactionalist in character
Garfinkel
- written records are “contractual” not “actuarial”
- not records of what actually happened, tokens fact that people fulfilled roles competently and reasonably
Building a house in zorse
- participation acknowledgement relatedness and mutual obligation
- brother in law builds the zong (contains shrines)
- building a zing is a comment in status if bridewealth
- shrines as social records