Midterm Flashcards
(44 cards)
Frederick Taylor What are the two concerns that led to the development of his theory?
- Concerned that there was an uneven or poor quality of training for workers. Old worker usually trains new worker, doesn’t always show them all the dangers or how to efficiently do the job, not consistent.
- The employers want productivity, older people who have been working for so long cannot work as fast as new people. Peer pressure on faster worker to slow down to the average rate. (paid per piece), if they see faster workers working, they are worried they’ll decrease wage per piece (systematic soldiering).
Time and motion studies
what is the most efficient way for someone to arrange their workplace? Set up to maximize productivity, but workers don’t get breaks so workers hate it.
Human relations approach and family metaphor
We want our workers to be happy and satisfied, we are going to pay attention to our workers’ needs
Hawthorne studies – findings
If we pay attention to workers needs and give them a good environment, will that affect productivity? Went into factory and changed conditions (light, temperature, etc.) to see the effects and productivity did not change under those conditions, initial finding was the employee felt important because they were asked how they were doing, so they were more productive
Re-examination of Hawthorne studies
Re-examination shows just paying attention to them wasn’t all, there were other factors, two older women left and replaced with more efficient workers, going back to peer-pressure theory
Maslow’s hierarchy of needs
Pyramid, fulfill the basic needs first, typically lower level needs must be satisfied first but you can go up and down the pyramid
Level 5- self-actualization Level 4- Esteem Level 3- Affiliation Level 2- Safety Level 1- Physiological
Pre-potency
normally lower level needs must be satisfied before you can put energy into higher level needs
McGregor’s Theory X
Theory X is the more negative view of workers, if you have Theory X, you won’t be giving more responsibility to workers or asking them for advice. Workers are lazy, resist change, dislike responsibilities, are not bright and need to be controlled by rewards and punishments. In Theory X, communication messages travel downward, limited upward communication, people fear and distrust management, and decisions are made by top level management
McGregor’s Theory Y
Theory Y is the more positive view of workers, people want a balance between work and play, you don’t always need to be threatening workers, workers can be self-directed and self-motivated
Explain the story of “Sweet and Low”
The first is the story of “Sweet and Low” the artificial sweetener that comes in the pink packets. The company was founded in 1945 in New York City. The original plant is still in use in a lower-income neighborhood. The plant employs many minority women who are single parents. The owner has arranged working hours so that the women can leave at 2:30 pm to go home and supervise their children after school. While the owner could upgrade the equipment, so that fewer employees are needed and the assembly line would be more computerized, he has refused to do so. He wants to employ more people and provide jobs for that community, so he consciously chooses to use older equipment which requires more workers on the line. As a result of his attention to his workers’ needs, he has VERY loyal employees. He is not interested in maximizing his profit. He is making a good profit and that is enough for him. The company also packages individual servings of catsup and soy sauce. The color pink was chosen to stand out in a sugar bowl of packets. The name of the company came from Ben’s favorite song which had also been the title of a Tennyson poem.
Explain the story of “Malden Mills”
The second story is about Malden Mills, a large textile factory in Lawrence, Massachusetts. Many other textile mills went South or even overseas to find cheaper labor and energy costs. But Aaron Feuerstein, the owner refused to move and leave his people. He is known as “a man of his word” and loyal and compassionate about his employees. On Dec.11, 1995, on his 70th birthday, an explosion and fires destroyed three of his textile mills. This meant that 1400 employees faced layoffs just two weeks before Christmas. Three days later, Feuerstein met with employees and vowed to rebuild, rather than take the insurance money and head South or overseas. He also provided workers with a holiday bonus and promised to continue to pay them for the next 60 days. He received a standing ovation and shouts of appreciation from the workers.
Employees shouted “God Bless you, Aaron. This has got to be the best company in America.” Aaron responded, “I consider the employees standing in front of me the most valuable asset that Malden Mills has. I don’t consider them, like some companies do, an expense that can be cut..”
Human Resources approach
Employees are our assets and we want to develop their skills
What are the two things that led to the development of the Human Resources approach?
l. Do human relations principles really work? The answer is No. There is no clear proof that these principles work. There no clear evidence that increasing worker satisfaction leads to more productivity. The impact on the bottom line is the critical issue for most companies.
2. There has been some misuse of the human relations principles. For example, a manager who believes in Theory X assumptions might use some superficial Theory Y behaviors in an effort to gain more control over his employees. He might ask for employee opinions about an issue without ever intending to use their input in decision-making. This is called “pseudopartici-pation.” He or she didn’t really believe that employees had enough knowledge or talent to make high-quality decisions or work independently.
Weber’s 3 types of authority
- charismatic authority- people who have followers because they are charismatic and charming (JFK, FDR, Donald Trump)
- rational-legal authority- somebody who is following the rules and laws
- Traditional- power based on long-standing beliefs, kings/queens
What is psuedoparticipation?
Lots of companies were just pretending they cared about employees, ask them for input but then don’t change anything
Systems approach
A company has varying levels/components, all the different components of the system are interdependent, interdependence- if sales people aren’t out getting orders, sales decrease and production slows, people may be fired/ if productivity is down, sales people are unhappy because customers are unhappy
What are the 4 characteristics of cultures?
complicated, emergent, not unitary, often ambiguous
Ethnographic approach
This is a qualitative method of observation. The researcher spends time in the culture, immersed in the organization, observing employees and reading memos and training manuals and talks with employees about their values, heroes and stories. The goal is to minimize the distance between the researcher and the culture—to learn through personal experience.
Critical approaches—3 approaches to the “political” frame of reference
- Unitary- you should fall in line, less conflict, listen to management, do what they say
- Pluralist- different groups with different goals, conflict is more accepted, look at different ways and see different subgroups
- Radical- there’s always a power struggle with opposing forces, 1 up 1 down, management vs. the union, who has the power?
Feminist theories
A liberal feminist would say that women should be promoted and receive their fair share of power and control in companies.
A radical feminist would say that women should totally separate from male-dominated institutions and start their own companies.
A standpoint feminist would say that everyone needs to be given a voice and they need to be heard within the company, particularly minorities and women who have been marginalized or ignored.
What assumptions and pressures within the NASA corporate culture led to the Challenger Disaster?
- Too many delays, costly for NASA’ image.
- NASA has conflicting goals of cost, on-time schedule and safety. So safety lost. Efficiency is more important than safety. We are a “can-do” culture.
- Pressure from Pres. Reagan’s staff to get first teacher in space for the State of the Union. For his PR. All over U.S. are watching her experiments in space and getting excited about science.
- Never before had an engineering company (contractor stopped a launch). Morton Thiokol Corp. wanted Congress to approve their bid on the next contact. After the disaster, change their name to ATK and still design rockets for NASA.
- Burden of proof changed. Instead of proving it WAS SAFE to launch, now engineers have to prove it WASN’T safe to launch. Impossible to prove a negative.
- The problem at NASA wasn’t as much a weak or broken culture, as two antagonistic cultures. Managerial culture took dominance over the engineering culture. Dissenting views not heard or discounted.
- Past performance of O-rings or foam leads to complacency. Past success is taken as proof of future success. By time of Columbia, look at over 100 successful missions of the Shuttles.
What assumptions and pressures within the NASA corporate culture led to the Columbia Disaster?
- NASA knew there was a foam strike at the launch. (have been foam strikes before and they were lucky).
- Engineers asked/begged to have pictures of the wing taken by a satellite to see the extent of the damage. NASA managers refused and squelched the idea. Because it would take time and if the Shuttle didn’t get to the Space Station on time, Congress would cut their budget and end the shuttle program. Role of $ and schedule.
- NASA has outsourced many jobs to save money and cut safety personnel, gave people multiple jobs. People stretched too thin.
- Could Columbia astronauts have been saved? They would have had 10 days to try. (Could have sent up a second shuttle or tried a series of spacewalks to repair it)
Classical Approach
Uses a machine model or metaphor which has 3 characteristics:
l. Specialization—also called Division of Labor. On an assembly line each worker is responsible for one specific function.
2. Standardization or replaceability—Employees are seen as “replaceable” on an assembly line. They are “cogs” in the machine. If a worker quits or is fired, you can hire someone new, train and replace the worker with little disruption.
3. Machines are predictable—If a machine breaks, you go to the operating manual and figure out how to fix it. Under the classical view, organizations are also predictable. If you have a problem, rationally analyze it, go to the employee handbook for guidance and fix it.
Fayol’s bridge/gangplank
One exception to a strict vertical chain of command, the bridge allows two employees at the same level in the hierarchy to communicate horizontally with approval of their managers