Midterm Flashcards

(48 cards)

1
Q

Precedent

A

an earlier event or action that is regarded as an example or guide to be considered in subsequent similar circumstances.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Stare decisis

A

Higher courts bind lower courts

the legal principle of determining points in litigation according to precedent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Concurring Reasons

A

one or more judges of a court who agrees with the decision made by the majority of the court, but states different (or additional) reasons as the basis for his or her decision

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the Charter

A

highest level of legislature
part of constitution act in 1982
Paramountcy over all other statutes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

S. 7 of the charter

A

Life, liberty, security of person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

S. 8 of the charter

A

Search and Seizure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

S. 9 of the charter

A

Random Stops (Arbitrary detention)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

S. 10 of the charter

A

Right to counsel

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

S. 11 of the charter

A

Procedural rights

requires trial within a reasonable time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

S. 13 of the charter

A

Right against self- incrimimation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

S. 24 of the charter

A

Remedies section of the charter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

S. 1 of the charter

A

Reasonable limits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

S. 52 of the charter

A

Makes charter supreme

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is jurisdiction

A

The ability to make people do what you say.
Historically, country’s jurisdiction extended as far as the army could effectively fight.
Leads to concept of sovereignty and borders.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

4 types of jurisdiction

A

Prosecutorial
Offence classification
Time
Territory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Federal jurisdiction

A

S.91 constitution act
enacting criminal law and procedure
Establishing & maintaining penitentiaries
Peace, order & good government

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Provincial jurisdiction

A
S.92 
Administration of justice
Establishing & maintaining prisons
Property & civil rights
Enforcing provincial laws
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Prosecutorial Jurisdiction: Provincial Crown

A

Prosecutes criminal & provincial offences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Prosecutorial Jurisdiction: Federal Crown

A

Prosecutes several federal acts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Offence Classification

A

Effects procedure to follow and rights of the accused.
Effects which court has jurisdiction, pretrial procedure and the right to jury.
Impacts on other area of jurisdiction such as time limits to prosecute, and the length of sentence.

21
Q

Indictable offences

A

Divided into three sub categories:
- s. 469- Most serious (Exclusive jurisdiction Supreme Court)
- S. 553 - Least serious (Absolute jurisdiction Provincial Court)
Other Indictable (Accused may elect level of trial)

22
Q

Summary Offences

A

Least serious.
• 6 months max jail sent and $2,000 fine (some exceptions).
• 6 months limitation period (exceptions).
Provincial court has absolute jurisdiction

23
Q

Hybrid offences

A
Crown has an election re indictable or summary
This election dictates procedure:
•	Time limits
•	Accused elections
•	Sentence range
24
Q

Time limitations for summary and indictable

A

Summary - 6 month limit

Indictable - No time limit

25
Arrest
No grounds needed to search Scope: offense related, evidence, or weapons Purpose: Compel attendance of accused in court. Protect people. Prevent continuation of offence.
26
Detention (Grounds & Scope)
Grounds: reasonable suspicion Scope:weapons
27
Powers to Arrest (Anyone)
S. 30 Code Breach of peace Anyone who witnesses a breach of the peace May detain anyone who: commits the breach, is about to join, is about to renew Must give person over to peace officer Can use reasonable force proportionate to danger Breach must be serious disturbance that, if not stopped, will likely escalate into an assault or serious property damage.
28
Search on Detention
1- Officer is only entitled to conduct a pat-down search for the purpose of ensuring officer safety. 2- Search incidental to an investigative detention only authorized where the circumstances warrant a genuine concern for officer safety.
29
Power to Detain
Articulable cause detention Requires a constellation of objectively discernible facts which give the detaining officer reasonable cause to suspect that the detainee is criminally implicated in the activity under investigation. It is not enough to show the police had a subjective belief that the detainees were engaged in criminal activity.
30
Bail Hearing
Grounds to Detain s. 515(10) Primary: Ensure attendance in court Secondary: Safety of public or victim or witness Tertiary: Maintain confidence in administration of justice
31
Sources of Evidence Law
1. The common law 2. Statute 3. The Charter 4. Evidence scholarship 5. Ethical rules
32
General Principal of Admissability
* Relevance * Probative Value * Prejudicial Effect * Fairness
33
Define Evidence and what 3 forms can it take?
``` Defined as: that which tends to prove a fact in issue or something that may satisfy the enquirer of the fact’s existence Can take three forms 1) Oral evidence 2) Documentary evidence 3) Physical evidence ```
34
Purpose of Laws of Evidence
The role of the judge is to ensure only admissible evidence is introduced This is based on the origins of the jury system. Question: what is the purpose of the trial 1) search for truth 2) to ensure a fair and just process of adjudicating guilt
35
Probative Value
Power to exclude evidence on the basis that it’s probative value is outweighed by the prejudice which may flow from it. The scope of the discretion depends on context. The test is narrower with crown evidence. Prejudice must substantially outweigh the value of the evidence before a judge can exclude evidence relevant to a defence
36
Prejudicial Effect and fairness
1) Moral prejudice Arises in case of bad character evidence Danger jury will convict because accused is bad person 2) Reasoning prejudice It distracts the jury from proper focus It unduly arouses the jury's emotions Eg. promiscuity in sexual assault victims
37
Exclusionary Rules
Exclusionary rules start with the presumption that certain types of evidence are inadmissible. This is generally justified on the basis that they are inherently unreliable and unnecessary.
38
Hearsay Rule
A declaration made out of court without the solemnity or process associated with that environment is prima facia inadmissible. It must be: Made out of court, Used to prove truth of what is being asserted
39
Examples of Necessity
A) Witness is deceased B) Witness is missing C) Witness is not compellable or info is privileged D) Witness is a child or otherwise incompetent to swear
40
Powers to Arrest (Without a warrant)
S. 494(1) Anyone may arrest without warrant: a person found committing indictable offence a person escaping from or being freshly pursued by someone with authority to arrest courts have said that when lay person arrests under this section, the Charter applies as if a government agent was doing it - so , s. 8 (Search and Seizure) applies However, they are not actually agents of state so no duty to provide s. 10 (right to counsel)
41
Powers to Arrest (property owners)
S. 494(2) Owner of property or authorized agent May arrest without warrant person finds committing criminal offence on or in relation to property he or she owns Broader than general arrest provision Must deliver arrested person to peace officer forthwith
42
Powers to Arrest (peace officer)
S. 31 - breach of peace No offence needed Officer must witness May arrest: finds committing breach, believes on rpg will join or renew breach So either breach must already be underway or have happened
43
Rational for Hearsay Rule
1) Unreliable: not made under oath, witness not personally before judge to assess, absence of cross examination to guard against fabrication and inaccuracy 2) Jury distrust: judicial doubt as to jury’s ability to properly assess hearsay 3) Fairness and procedural rights: right to challenge sources of evidence mandates presumptive exclusions of out of court statements.
44
Powers to Arrest (Without a warrant)
S. 494(1) Anyone may arrest without warrant: a person found committing indictable offence a person escaping from or being freshly pursued by someone with authority to arrest courts have said that when lay person arrests under this section, the Charter applies as if a government agent was doing it - so , s. 8 (Search and Seizure) applies However, they are not actually agents of state so no duty to provide s. 10 (right to counsel)
45
Powers to Arrest (property owners)
S. 494(2) Owner of property or authorized agent May arrest without warrant person finds committing criminal offence on or in relation to property he or she owns Broader than general arrest provision Must deliver arrested person to peace officer forthwith
46
Powers to Arrest (peace officer)
S. 31 - breach of peace No offence needed Officer must witness May arrest: finds committing breach, believes on rpg will join or renew breach So either breach must already be underway or have happened
47
What is test for Probative Value
Does it go to prove issue in question What is the strength of the inference to be drawn How reliable is the evidence
48
Rational for Hearsay Rule
1) Unreliable: not made under oath, witness not personally before judge to assess, absence of cross examination to guard against fabrication and inaccuracy 2) Jury distrust: judicial doubt as to jury’s ability to properly assess hearsay 3) Fairness and procedural rights: right to challenge sources of evidence mandates presumptive exclusions of out of court statements.