Midterm Flashcards

(37 cards)

1
Q

What is meant by code in terms of language processing?

A

Connects form and meaning organized into a hierarchy (sentence, phrase, word, morpheme, phoneme)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Association Models

A

1800s anatomists who looked at clear types of brain injury. Each lesion was associated with a specific linguistic feature.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

BDAE standardization

A

BDAE is standardized on PWA. This means that 50th percentile is in relation to other PWA.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

BDAE fluent vs. nonfluent

A

Fluency evaluated based on best 3-5 utterances of Conversational and Expository Speech subtest.

<5=nonfluent
> or equal to 5= fluent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

known vs. unknown contexts

A

In known context, client’s response is predictable (response to y/n questions/Cookie Theft description for example)

In unknown context, client’s response is unpredictable (conversational sample, for example)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

BDAE speech ratings (describe two ratings)

A

Speech is rated as either:
Agrammatic: usually nonfluent, lacks inflectional markers, prepositions, verbs, copulas
Paragrammatic: fluent with unsystematic omission of morphemes, nouns, verbs, adjectives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

BDAE Simple Social Response

A

Ask pt “How are you today?”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

BDAE yes/no response

A

Ask pt “have you ever been here before?”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

BDAE Familiar Info

A

Ask pt “What is your full name? What is your address?”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

BDAE Complex Ideational Material

A

Aud Comp at 2 levels: sentence (does a cork float in water?) and paragraph (ask pairs of y/n questions about paragraph)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

BDAE Nonverbal Agility

A

Test for apraxia.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

BDAE Recitation

A

Culturally biased. Automatized sequences (days of the week, counting to 21), melody/rhythm of nursery rhymes and songs

Grade of prosody as well as knowledge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

BDAE Naming

A

Responsive Naming (“What do we tell time with?”), Confrontational Naming (BNT)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Difference in HJ between BDAE and PAL?

A

In BDAE, it’s a reading task (there are stimuli that are irregular words that the patient must have learned their phonology and there are regular stimuli that patient must be able to map the phono rep onto). In PAL, it’s not a reading task.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Problem with BDAE Phrase/Sentence Reading subtest?

A

Not a homogenous set of stimuli

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What level is repetition at that goes into diagnosis?

A

Sentence Level

17
Q

What should you do if there is a weakness in writing on CAT?

A

Use PAL subtest because writing on CAT is weak.

18
Q

Strengths of BDAE?

A

Both long form and short form. There are extended subtests to administer even if you give short form.

Allows you to diagnose whether or not there’s aphasia and what type.

Good measure to figure out which type of aphasia. Much better than WAB at diagnosing milder forms of aphasia.

19
Q

WAB vs. BDAE (similarities and differences)

A

Similarities: classifies according to syndromes, similar subtests: aud comp, repetition, spontaneous speech, naming, reading, writing

Differences: WAB allows for phonemic, semantic, and tactile cues, upper limit of WAB aud comp is sentences whereas BDAE is paragraphs, WAB is an easier test to take and therefore more sensitive to more severe cases of aphasia, real objects for naming in the WAB, criteria for syndrome diagnosis is based on objective scoring in the WAB as opposed to a rating scale as on the BDAE

20
Q

BDAE Extended Testing

A
Fables
Auditory Comprehension Special Categories
Auditory Comp: reversible sentences
Repetition nonsense words
Naming special categories
Reading pseudohomophones
Reading bound and derivational morphemes
Writing irregular words, nonsense words, functors
Oral spelling
Writing verb forms, sentences
21
Q

3 subtests of aud comp BDAE

A

Word Discrimination, Following Commands, Complex Ideation

22
Q

Aspects of WAB Naming

A

In object naming, nothing abstract.

23
Q

3 syndrome batteries: norm or criterion-referenced?

A

BDAE and WAB: criterion-referenced

CAT: norm-referenced

24
Q

Strength in expression (naming) of CAT

A

Only syndrome test that looks at verbal expression (describing actions)

25
Aphasia-Communication Outcome Measure
ACOM. Good measure of QOL because it asks pt how effective they think their communication is certain environments.
26
BDAE Encoding
Dictation of words Primer words, regular forms Extended testing looks at irregular forms, nonsense words
27
Differences syndrome approach vs. psycholinguistic approach
In syndrome approach, all patients must be labeled with one category (type of aphasia, type of alexia, type of agraphia). In psycholinguistic approach, there can be multiple functional lesions.
28
Psycholinguistic Approach
Patient described in terms of damage to different processing operations Patient can have more than one impairment (functional lesion) unlike in syndrome where patient can only belong to one category Classify patients in terms of language processing components, not entire language tasks Requires a detailed description of the patients’ use of language at all levels of the language code and in all of the major language tasks
29
Lexical Errors
Verbal/semantic paraphasias. Formal (result is real word e.g. train to tree), semantic, mixed, unrelated
30
Sublexical errors
Phonemic paraphasias (result is nonword e.g. ghost to goth), neologism
31
Visual agnosia
Function lesion in visual object recognition system (visual perception, structural description) Visual perception: able to see correctly Structural description: able to interpret meaning of pi
32
Lemma vs lexeme
``` Lemma= Non-phonological representation of a word associated with semantic & grammatic information of "dog" Lexeme= all derived words from a single lemma ```
33
Dell's 1997 Model-Naming Errors
Lexical Errors: errors at the lemma level which have syntactic constraints (arise due to impairment in lemma access) Sublexical Errors: errors at the lexeme level which do not have syntactic constraints (arise due to impairment in phonological access)
34
Dell's Model on Formal Errors: impairment in phonological access vs lemma access
Impairment in phonological access: error can be real or nonword and has no more likelihood of being same part of speech or not as target Impairment in lemma access: error must be a real word, must be same part of speech as target
35
BDAE sentence comprehension
F=2 so score of 50% is at chance. Due to heterogeneity of stimuli, want to test further to see what sentences are difficult for pt to understand.
36
What kinds of errors tell us that there is an impairment in accessing semantic representation?
semantic errors in naming and all other tasks, poor auditory and visual word-picture matching
37
What kinds of errors tell us that there is an impairment in accessing phonological output lexicon?
Patient who can write name of object but cannot name it Patient with good auditory and reading comprehension but poor naming of object