Midterm Articles & Populations Flashcards

(31 cards)

1
Q

Fletcher & Maher:

standard(s) associated?

A

standard 2: boundaries of competence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Fletcher & Maher:

definition of competence?

A
  • unclear definition of competence within sports pscyhology
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Fletcher & Maher:

how does one become competent according to AASP?

A
  • education, re-certifications, trainings
  • maintain reasonable level of awareness of current information
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Fletcher & Maher:

what are some limitations of training and development for applied SP?

A
  • missing competencies (such as reflection)
  • superficially described competencies
  • competencies not broken down into sub-components (lacking essential components and subsequent behavioral anchors)
  • overemphasis on topics rather than developments of competencies
  • overreliance on unidimensional
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Fletcher & Maher:

Competency cube?

A
  • foundational competency domains
  • functional competency domains
  • stages of professional development
  • cube is multidimensional, offers mechanism for competencies to be visualized on various spectrums
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Baltzell et al. (2010) - Who is my client?

Standard(s)?

A

9 - Multiple Relationships

17 - Informed Consent

19 - Confidentiality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Baltzell et al. (2010) - Who is my client?

Suggestions:

A
  • understand these are multilayered dynamics
  • clarify roles and parameters for all involved at beginning
  • informed consent established at beginning for primary client.
    a) modality of sessions included in informed consent (phone comms have limits)
  • informed consent is ongoing process
  • don’t be Lone Ranger - seek mentorship/advice from others (while maintaining confidentiality)
  • consider how all members of sport context will perceive your consulting
  • stay morally and ethically bound
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Youth Consulting (Ch 3)

Standard(s)?

A

12 - Third Party Request for Services

17 - Informed Consent

19 - Confidentiality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Youth Consulting (Ch 3)

age AND competitve level of athlete will dictate?

A

a) role of SEP practitioner
b) protential risks involved in provision of services
—- most often: boundary issues
c) standards of practice
—- confidentially more challening
—- informed consent / assent
d) moral, ethical, legal obligations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Boundary Issues:

Role Expectations?

A
  • provide details that define what, why, how, when, and where
  • discuss consulting approach and philosophy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Informed Consent… in action

A
  • you are constantly educating your athletes, parents, parties…
  • add context - tell them why you are doing what you’re doing.
  • ‘because it’s required’ can be translated as ‘best standard of care’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Visek et al. - Youth Sport Consulting Model for Practitioners

Standard(s)?

A
  • 2 - Boundaries of Competence
  • 9 - Multiple Relationships
  • 12 - Third Party Requests for Services
  • 17 - Informed Consent
  • 19 - Confidentiality
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Sandgren et al - Eating Psychopathology

Standard(s)?

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Group Virtual Meetings

A

creates accessibility, but comes with caveats:

  • potential breaks of confidentiality
  • legal boundaries must be considered from location of client, not practitioner

— be up front, help them understand constraints and reasons (confidentiality, standard of care!)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Consulting Collegiate Athletes

A
  • create additional travel informed consent or include in your original
    — travel scenarios are not controlled, leave it up to them to approach you
  • standard 6 - you have obligation to be mentally healthy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Van Raalte et al.

Risks of intrateam romances?

A
  • legal, ethical, performance
  • perceptions of risk vary between high performing and recreational teams
  • romances between athletes and/or staff of unequal status pose ethical risk
  • breakups can spillover into sport domain
17
Q

Consulting w/ Medical Team (Chap 9)

Standard(s)?

A
  • 7 - avoiding harm (i.e. their desire to keep playing injured)
  • 11 - consultations and referrals
  • 19 - confidentiality
  • 2 - boundaries of competence
  • 17 - informed consent
18
Q

Consulting for Professional Athletes

Standard(s)?

A

holy trinity of ethical issues in SP are:
1) competence
2) confidentiality
3) multiple relationships

19
Q

Case Study 1 - mutliple roles, relationships, & organizational demands:

ex: teacher & consultant, coach and consultant

A
  • dual relationships not prohibited but cautioned.
  • take care not to lose OBJECTIVITY
  • discuss at outset how you’ll greet one another in the wild
20
Q

Case Example 2 - Team at Bar

A
  • let team make first contact
  • held professional boundary, didn’t accept drink
  • kept convo unrelated to work (cannot maintain confidentiality at crowded bar)
  • purposeful humor can help send message
  • MUST MAINTAIN PROFESSIONALISM

—- intent doesn’t matter, perception does

21
Q

Elsborg et al

Challenges of Olympics Consultant; Formal Challenges:

A

1) Job related
— professional skills needed, pscyh support
2) multiple teams
— creatie and flexible, access issues
3) dealing with media
—- know what you’re there for!
4) ethical issues
— client confidentiality
— clear agreements

22
Q

Elsborg et al

Challenges of Olympics Consultant; Informal Challenges

A
  • unplanned consultations
  • being available without disturbing
  • pressure on athletes/coaches
  • part of the group, naturally
  • maintain calmness
  • self care related challenges (using personal time, seeking colleague support, family support, dealing with pressures on self)
23
Q

Males et al - bodybuilder

Standard(s)

24
Q

Zizi & Fogaca - Superision in Exercise Sports Setting

How are these clients different?

A
  • different population
  • different setting (confidentiality challenges
  • more sharing of health info with team of practitioners
  • how does one gain competence in EP?
25
Exercise Sports Setting Standard(s)?
- Principle A - Competence - Principle C - Professional and Scientific Responsibility - 2 - Boundaries & Competence - 4 - Personal Problems & Conflicts (values differences, weight bias)
26
Case Study: Exercise Psych Ethical Considerations
- if terminate sessionas and were main source of support, can be doing harm - Multiple relationships - if they also want you to be their workout partner - personal problems - physical attraction may be present - competence boundary - if don't have fitness background, shouldnt train them DO NO HARM & CYA
27
Case Study: Rita Business Coaching ethical considerations:
- maintaining confidentiality - limits of confidentiality - minimizing intrusion on privacy - consultations - exploitatative relationships - boundaries of competence - conflict of interest
28
Case Study: Rita Business Coaching suggestions
- gain craig's buy in while also recruting qualified colleagues with competence - best tool is communication - craig's approval to continue very early stage discussions - take notes and document the conversation - call president back, let them know about craig and suggest he be present in future convos, outline capabilities and share she'll be bringing on colleagues with competencies
29
Population: Military
- read opinion paper
30
Population: Performing Artists
- read opinion paper
31
Case Study: Law
- read opinion paper