Midterm Problem Question Flashcards
(11 cards)
Ratio of Armony v dalamirie
The finder of an item acquires property/title to the item that enables him/her to keep it against all but the true owner
Ratio of bridges v hawkesworth
The owner of the place where a lost item is found does not acquire a better right to it the the finder when the lost item is not in his/her custody or within the protection of his/her property before it is found and the true owner cannot be found
Ratio of Elwes b Briggs gas company
A landlord/property owner dispute being unaware of their existence has a better right to items found under the surface of the land than the tenant/occupier when the true owner cannot be found. In the absence of an explicit or implied term stating otherwise
Ratio of south Staffordshire water co v Sharman
A property owner who has possession of a place with a manifest intention to exercise control over it and the things which may be upon or in it has a better right to any items found there than the item
Ratio of Hannah v peel
The owner of a property who has never been in physical possession of it DOES NOT have a superior right to the items found in or on it but not attached to it when he/she is unaware of the existence of the items than the finder
Ratio of Parker v British airways board
An occupier who restricts entry to his /her property to certain members of the public but takes no other steps to demonstrate an intention to exercise control over things found does not have a superior right to items found over finder - when true owner cannot be found
Ratio of Tamworth industries
An occupier of a property has not manifested an intention to exercise control over the property and the things that may be on or in it in order to have a stronger claim to an item found then the finder when the true owner can’t be found- with unrestricted public access
IRAC stands for
Introduction
ISSUE
RELEVANT LAW
APPLICATION - subheadings /questions
CONCLUSION
Subheadings
1) can the true owner be found
2) was the item found on, in, under or upon the property
3) was there anything that reduced the finders rights
4) did the finder take the item into their possession
5) how accessible to the public was the place the item was found
6) was there a manifest intention to exercise control over the property
Cases where the finder has stronger claim regarding where it was found on property
Hannah v peek
Bridges v hawkesworth
Parker v British airways
Tamworth industries limited v AG
All found on
Cases where occupant has stronger right considering where item was found on property
South Staffordshire water co v Sharman
Ellwes v Briggs gas company