Midterm Revision Flashcards
(76 cards)
Features of Marxism
Alienation and surplus value
Weaknesses of Marxism
Overemphasises class and economically deterministic
Strengths of Marxism
How society is organised under capitalism and two main classes are fundamentally opposed
Features of feminism
Counter male stream Sociology and conflict
Strengths of feminism
Forces female inclusion and legislation
Weaknesses of feminism
Excludes other factors and no general consensus
Features of Weberism
Class party status and verstehen
Strengths of Weberism
Class, party, status and individual motives
Weaknesses of Weberism
Underemphasises class and society shapes individual
Features of functionalism
Organic analogy and value consensus
Strengths of functionalism
Organic analogy and value consensus
Weaknesses of functionalism
Ignores human agency and idealised society
Features of symbolic interactionism
Role taking and free will
Strengths of symbolic interactionism
Focuses on individuals and human agency
Weaknesses of symbolic interactionism
Lack of testability and difficult to extrapolate
Features of consensus theories
- To exist and flourish, society must have similar attitudes and beliefs and a broad agreement on values
- Societal beliefs are passed on through primary socialisation (in families) and secondary socialisation (for example education)
- Society is characterised by agreement and harmony, with different structures in society having a controlling but beneficial influence over the lives of individuals
Strengths of consensus theories
- Recognises the role that socialisation plays in determining behaviour
- Identifies the importance of society as an integrated whole with independent parts
Weaknesses of consensus theories
- We cannot explain violent and radical social change with a theory that emphasises consensus.
- By promoting social equilibrium, it is inherently conservative and against progress in society
Features of conflict theories
- Believe that society is characterised by disagreement and oppression — there is one group in society that has power over others
- State that tensions and conflicts arise when resources, status and power are unevenly distributed between groups in society, and that these conflicts become the engine for social change
- Understand power as control of material resources and accumulated wealth, control of politics, and the institutions that make up society
Strengths of conflict theories
- Explains the strife and disharmony that characterises much of society today. Shows how a power imbalance can cause tension
- Explains why so many people feel helpless and unable to change their lives by showing the influence that structures can have in shaping individuals into predetermined roles
Weaknesses of conflict theories
- Can’t explain the persistence of modern Western societies as relatively stable societies
- Sometimes viewed as too negative. Some structures in society can be seen as working for the common good, and some individuals are able to break through barriers to success in their life
Features of structure theories
-Starts with society as a whole and then analyses specific social institutions, social structures and social groups
-Interested in trends, structures and social forces so they are more likely to use research methods that tend to generate quantitative, statistical data
-Interested in social structures and can be considered ‘macro’ sociology
Strengths of structure theories
- Explains trends in society by looking at the ‘big picture’ and examining statistics that show changes over time, allowing us to better understand society as a whole
- Shows the influence of structures on our lives by explaining the interactions that occur between these structures and the individual. This shows the limitations of individual human agency in changing society
Weaknesses of structure theories
- Has difficulty in explaining why some individuals seem to be able to make a difference in society and are able to ‘escape’ the confines of the social forces acting on them
- Because it focuses on social structures, it has little to say about individual human interactions between people. This means that there is a lot of human social behaviour that seems to be ‘beneath’ the social perspective