Midterm ( Self Report Assessment) Flashcards
(117 cards)
Personality Assessment is a ____ contribution of psychologists
unique
Nomothetic
That part of variance in a quality that is shared by people
Idiographic
That part of variance that is unique to the individual
Objective Test refers to:
(Traditionally)
- Structured stimulus (a specific statement)
- A limited set of externally provided answers (True/False, Likert scale)
- Does not rely on scorer’s judgment (scored according to key)
Non-objective aspects of “objective” tests include:
- Test taker/rater’s willingness to be honest (malingering, etc)
- Test taker/rater ability to be honest (lack of self knowledge, response styles; Halo effects and Scapegoating effects)
- Imperfections in the tests (ambiguity, psychometrics, etc.)
Another term for “Objective Test” is
“Self-Report Test”
“Objective Test”/”Self-Report Test” usually rely on the patient, but may involve data from:
- Parent questionnaire
- Spousal rating scale
- Teacher questionnaire
- Etc.
Projective Tests refers to:
(Traditionally)
- Ambiguous stimulus or activity (E.g., inkblot)
- Test-taker generates a response with minimal external guidance
- In responding the test-taker projects or puts forward elements of their habits, personality
- Interpretation requires subjectivity
Rorschach Inkblot Method would fit the classical definition of ________ test.
Projective
(ambiguity, infinite answers)
Scoring the Rorschach involves ________ classification and ____-____ styles more than projection.
- Stimulus
- Problem-solving
It has been argued that Rorschach scoring strictly limits __________.
Subjectivity
The two types of projective tests are ________ and ________.
- Purely projective tests - rely exclusively on projection (House-Tree-Person, Thematic Apperception Test, Roberts Picture Story, etc.)
- Performance-based personality tests - which have substantial nomothetic aspects (Rorschach, Wartegg Drawing Completion Test, Adult Attachment Projective)
Attributes of a Good Test:
- Clear instructions for administering, scoring, and interpreting
- Efficient use (incremental validity)
- Accurate: Reliability–consistency & Validity–measures what it purports to measure
Purposes of Personality Assessment:
- To describe current functioning
- To confirm, refute or modify impressions
- To identify therapeutic needs
- To aid in differential diagnosis
- To monitor treatment
- To manage risk
- As an effective short-term therapeutic intervention.
To guard against bias / human thinking errors
Best defenses against inaccurate conclusions:
Using valid & reliable measures
-Which guard against bias/blind spots
Multi-Method Assessment
-Using multiple methods of measuring
-Blend the various strengths and weaknesses every instrument inevitably has
Collaborative/Therapeutic Assessment
Reasons NOT to do Assessment
- When reaching beyond our own limits
- When invading a person’s privacy
- When collecting data too limited to support the conclusions we draw
- When the data will be misused
- When over-generalizing
- When inefficient use of limited financial resources.
- When feedback will not be provided (except in certain circumstances).
What is personality?
“An individual’s unique constellation of psychological traits and states”
What are traits?
Relatively enduring ways in which one person varies from another
-Somewhat situation-dependent and not perfectly consistent
What are states?
temporary characteristics
(unlike traits which are enduring)
Per Meyer & Erdberg (2017), personality is:
- a bio-psycho-social construct
- the relatively stable set of attitudes and behaviors that makes each person unique
- the product of a complex interaction of nature, nurture, and context
Per Meyer & Erdberg (2017), personality disorders are:
- are the maladaptive extremes of normal personality characteristics –
- “…deviate markedly from expectation of an individual’s culture…”
Mischel’s (1968, 1994) stance in the States vs Traits debate:
Traits are not very important determinants of behavior; rather the context of the behavior is most important
Bandura’s (1986) stance in the States vs Traits debate:
Trait theorists neglect the functionality of a behavior in a particular situation (reinforcement, etc.)
Wachtel’s stance in the States vs Traits debate:
Traits are important; differing experiences cause people to see similar situations differently (or different situations similarly); traits can influence the kinds of situations we put ourselves in