MINORITY INFLUENCE Flashcards
(15 cards)
- what is meant by minority influence
- how does this differ from conformity
- social influence form where persuasive minority changes behaviours and attitudes of the majority
- often leads to internalisation
- in conformity, the majority influences the minority
- often leads to compliance
Outline Moscovici’s aims and procedure
- to see if a consistent minority could influence a majority into giving an incorrect answer
BLUE-GREEN EXPERIMENT: - 127 female ppts given colour-blind test
- placed in groups with 4 ppts, 2 confederates (con = minority)
- 36 slides of shades of blue
- ppts to state, out loud, whether it was blue or green
CONDITION 1 - consistent confederates, stating “green” on every trial
CONDITION 2 - inconsistent confederate, “green” 24 times, “blue” 12 times
Outline Moscovici’s findings
- with a consistent minority, ppts gave wrong answer on 8.42% of trials
- with an inconsistent minority, ppts gave wrong answer on 1.25% of trials
- in control group, ppts gave wrong answer on 0.25% of trials
What 3 factors influence the effectiveness of a minority
- consistency
- commitment
- flexibility
What is the difference between synchronic and diachronic consistency
Diachronic = all people in the minority saying the same thing over a LONG TIME PERIOD
- how does consistency affect effectiveness of minority influence
- outline an example
- keeping same beliefs results in others re-thinking their views
- can lead to internalisation
- SUFFRAGETTE MOVEMENT
- hard, peaceful work led to the majority’s acceptance of their view
How does commitment affect the effectiveness of minority influence
- dedication shown when minority partakes in activities with high risk
- extreme activities cause the majority to pay attention to the cause
- called “the augmentation principle”
How does flexibility affect the effectiveness of minority influence
- persuasive minority’s require flexibility
- rigid minorities appear “dogmatic” and less effective
Outline Nemeth’s aim and experiment
- investigated the idea of flexibility
- ppts to agree of amount of compensation to give to a victim
CONDITION 1- minority was inflexible in their suggestion for the amount compensation
CONDITION 2 - minority compromised/showed flexibility for their suggestion for the amount of compensation
Outline Nemeth’s findings and conclusion
- inflexible minority had little to no effect on majority
- flexible minority resulted in the majority being much more likely to change their view
- showed importance of minority not appearing dogmatic, but instead maintaining flexibility regarding their views
Outline research support for consistency
- include Wendy Wood
- Moscvici’s blue green experiment
- showed if minority remains consistent, they will have a greater effect on the majority (8.42% of trials compared to 1.25%)
- Wendy Wood conducted meta-analysis of too similar studies ad confirmed the findings
What did Moscovici suggest about the power of minority influence
- privacy
- Moscovici et al found that when pots wrote down answers privately, they were more likely to agree with the minority view
- suggests that the view in public was just “tip of the iceberg”
Outline a limitation of research into into minority influence
- artificial tasks
- artificial tasks often used, e.g. Moscovici’s blue-green task
- research therefore doesn’t allow an insight on how minority influence works in real life
- in real-life, outcomes are more important, meaning whether or not a view changes is a lot more important
- studies often lack external validity, so are limited
Outline research support for deeper processing
- Robin Martin
- Robin Martin et al showed a group a viewpoint that a minority group agreed with
- another group showed a viewpoint that aa majority group agreed with
- ppts exposed to a conflicting view and had their attitudes measured
- ppts less willing to change views if they heard a minority group agree
- suggests that messages from minority lead to deeper processing/enduring effects
- supports main idea for how MI works
Outline a limitation for deeper processing
- Robin Martin’s research
- real world situations are more complicated than situations in research studies
- minorities often have less power in society
- must be committed to face hostile opposition
- in research, they are simplified into being the smallest group
- therefore, Martin et al’s findings are limited