Minority Influence is stronger than Majority Influence Flashcards

(29 cards)

1
Q

Moscovici et al date

A

1969

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Mocsovici et al study name

A

Minority influence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Method: the study was a

A

laboratory experiment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Method: what gender were the participants?

A

female

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Method: how many women took part?

A

192

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Method: how many women were in each group?

A

6

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Method: participants judged

A

the colour of 36 slides

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Method: all the slides were blue but

A

the shades of blue varied

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Method: two of the six participants were

A

confederates

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Method: condition 1

A

the confederates called all the slides green (consistent)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Method: condition 2

A

the confederates called 24 of the slides green and 12 blue (inconsistent)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Method control group

A

a control group was used which there were no confederates

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Results: control group

A

the participants called the slides ‘green’ 0.25% of the time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Results: condition 1 (consistent) adopted the minority view

A

8.4%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Results: condition 1 (consistent) called a slide ‘green’ once

A

32%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Results: condition 2 (inconsistent)

17
Q

Conclusion: the confederates were in the minority but

A

their views appear to have influenced the real participants

18
Q

Conclusion: the use of two conditions illustrated that the minority

A

had more influence when they were consistent

19
Q

Evaluation: the study lacked ecological validity because it was conducted in a

20
Q

Evaluation: the task was

21
Q

Evaluation: the participants may have felt that judging the colour of a slide was a

A

trivial exercise

22
Q

Evaluation: the study was only conducted on women so

A

the results can’t be generalized to men

23
Q

Evaluation: in a similar experiment

A

participants were asked to write down their answers instead of saying them and even more people agreed with the majority

24
Q

Nemeth et al date

25
Nemeth et al repeated Moscovici's experiment but
instructed participants to answer with all of the colours they saw in the slide rather then just one, singular colour
26
Nemeth et al ran three variations
there were two confederates
27
Nemeth et al: the three variations were
the confederates said all the slides were green the confederates said the slides were either green or blue-green] the confederates said the brighter slides were blue-green and the duller shades were green
28
when the confederates always answered green or varied their response randomly
they had no effect on the participants repsonces
29
in the condition where the responses varied
the confederates had a significant effect