Minority influence, resistance to social influence and social change. Flashcards
(35 cards)
What is resistance to social influence?
=The ability to withstand the social pressure to conform to the majority or obey authority.
What is social support?
the presence of people who resist pressures to conform or obey can help others to do the same by acting as models.
What is a dissenter?
holding owns own opinions despite what’s commonly held.
Asch’s dissenter variation:
When one confederate was instructed to dissent in Asch’s experiments, conformity dropped to 5.5% percent when giving the correct answer.
Even when the dissenter gave a different wrong answer, it still dropped to 9%.
Why do dissenters decrease conformity?
Dissenter is a model to the participant to be freed of the social influence and follow their own conscience.
Shows the importance of social support.
Milgram’s disobedience variation:
In one of Milgram’s variations, the teacher was joined by a dissenter, and the rate of obedience dropped from 65% to 10%.
Why do dissenters decrease obedience?
The participant may not follow the disenter but they allow the participant to be freed of their own conscience and challenge the legitimacy of the authority.
Strengths of social support: Albrecht?
Albrecht (2006) evaluated a programme helping pregnant teenagers to resist smoking. When paired with a buddy, they were significantly less likely to smoke compared to those who did not have one. Social support can help younger people choose healthier habits.
Strengths of social support: Gamson?
Gamson (1982) told participants to produce evidence to aid an oil company in running a smear campaign. The group had an opportunity to discuss. 88% rebelled and resisted.
Who proposed a locus of control?
Julia Rotter 1966.
What is a locus of control?
Refers to a sense that we each have about what directs events in our lives.
Internals believe we are mostly responsible for events and externals believe that outside forces or luck is responsible.
How do loci of control link to resistance to social influence?
People with a high internal LOC are more able to resist pressure, because they take personal responsibility for actions and experiences and tend to base decisions on beliefs and morals.
They also tend to be more self confident, more achievement-oriented and have higher intelligence. These traits link to higher resistance to social influence.
Strengths of locus of control: Holland?
Holland (1967)- repeated Milgram’s baseline study and measured whether participants with internals or externals. 37% of internals did not continue to the highest level compared with only 23% externals. So internals showed greater resistance.
Weaknesses of locus of control: Twenge?
analysed data from American locus of control studies conducted over a 40 year period. Over time, people have become more resistant but also more external, suggesting locus of control is now not a valid explanation and lacks temporal validity.
What is minority influence?
=Refers to situations where a small group of people influence the beliefs and behaviours of other people. Most likely leading to internalisation as both public and private behaviours change.
What are the three components of minority influence?
Consistency, commitment, fleixbility.
Consistency:
The minority must be consistent with their views.
Increases the interest of others.
What is syn-chronic consistency?
lots of people saying the same message.
What is diachronic consistency?
repetition overtime.
Commitment:
Must demonstrate commitment to their views.
Extreme activities to help get viewpoints across and it is important that these actions risk the minority.
Majorities are then likely to pay attention.
The augmentation principle.
Flexibility:
Being too rigid and dogmatic is off-putting to the majority.
Minorities should adapt their review and accept counter arguments.
What is the process of changes?
- A new opinion is heard and considered especially if the minority is consistent/committed/flexible.
- This leads to deeper processing which is important in the process of conversion.
- As they switch positions there is a snowball effect where others join, making the minority view the majority view.
Moscovici 1969 procedure?
-Two groups of 6 women were shown 36 slides of varying intensity of blue and asked to state whether the slides were blue or green.
-Within each group there were two confederates in either condition. 1) Consistently stating the wrong colour. 2) Inconsistency (24/36 slides).
Moscovici 1969 findings:
Findings: consistent minority 8.42% gave the same wrong answer. Inconsistent minority 1.25%. In a control group the figure was 0.25%.