minority influence + social influence + social change Flashcards

(28 cards)

1
Q

minority influence vs majority influence

A
  • majority influence (conformity)- people identify with majority and try to ‘fit in’ with their opinions
  • minority influence= people consider message itself + want to understand why the minority hold this position
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is minority influence more likely to lead to?

A

internalisation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is minority influence?

A

when a small group of people/individual changes the attitudes, behaviours + beliefs of the majority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

factors to enhance effectiveness of minority influence?

A

flexibility
consistency
commitment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is meant by flexibility?

A
  • minority should adapt their point of view + accept reasonable and valid counter opinions –> otherwise could put people off + they may remain unsympathetic
  • this is where consistency should be modified (need a balance)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is meant by consistency?

A
  • consistent shows majority you are firm, resolute + strong in the face of possible criticism or outright hostility
  • consistent minority makes people rethink their own views?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what are the two types of consistency?

A
  • diachronic consistency
  • synchronic consistency
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

diachronic consistency

A

minority have been arguing their view/message for some time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

synchronic consistency

A

minority all share same view/message

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what is meant by commitment?

A
  • need to show full commitment to their message
  • can be shown by indirect + direct action (maybe extreme cases (e.g. burning things etc)) –> this makes minority pay more attention
  • strong commitment (even when being mocked) –> lead to majority to think the minority believe in their campaign (augmentation principle)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what are the processes of change?

A

if you hear something new you may think about it more deeply especially if consistency, flexibility + consistency is shown.

overtime increasing numbers of people switch from majority position to minority –> they’ve become converted –> more this happens=faster rate of conversion –> SNOWBALL EFFECT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Moscovoici el at sudy: aim

A

see if minority could influence majority when choosing between different colour slides

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Moscovoici el at sudy: procedure

A
  • ppts. given eye tests (to check if colour blind)
  • placed in groups (4 ppts. + 2 confederates)
  • shown 36 slides of different shades of blue + asked to state colour of each slide out loud
  • first part the 2 confederates said green but for all 36 slides (consistent in response)
  • second part they said green 24x and blue 12 x (inconsistent in response)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Moscovoici el at sudy: results

A
  • when confederates consistent 4 ppts conformed and called slide green 8.42% of the trials, 32% calling a slide green at least once
  • when inconsistent in answers= conformity reduced to 1.25%
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Moscovoici el at sudy: conclusion

A

minority can influence majority when show consistent behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Moscovoici el at sudy: eval points (pt1)

A
  • 2/3 didn’t conform to minority at any time –> only small proportion so can’t generalise to public
  • lab experiment- so wasn’t representative of something we’d expect
  • only woman used= can’t generalise results
  • artificial task= lacks mundane realism
  • minority influence may be due to personality
17
Q

Moscovoici el at sudy: eval points (pt2)

A
  • wood et al did a meta-analysis of 100 similar studies + found minorities who were consistent = most influential
  • political campaigning/Jury decision making= outcomes are important= many studies on MI lack external validity + limited on telling us how MI works in real life situations
18
Q

Moscovoici el at sudy: eval points (pt3)

A
  • variations in Moscovici study= ppts. wrote answers= private agreement with minority was greater
  • they found ppl. less willing to change opinions if listened to minority group
  • Martin et al= research support for deeper processing- he gave ppts. a message supporting a particular viewpoint + measured their agreement -> 1 group heard minority group agree, another heard majority –> ppts= exposed to conflicting views then had attitudes measured again –> ppl were less willing to change opinions if they had listened to minority group over majority = minority group had deeper processing and bigger effect BUT real life situations more complex (majority often have more power + status which is not acknowledged in research)
19
Q

minority influence in research

A
  • Asch- when dissenter broke power of majority= conformity dropped, could lead to social change
  • milgram- when confederate teacher refused to shock learner= obedience of ppts. dropped (importance of a disobedient role model)
  • zimbardo- used to create social change via gradual commitment

social change= encouraged by drawing attention to what others are doing

20
Q

steps of social change (DCDASS)

A
  1. drawing attention
  2. consistency
  3. deeper processing
  4. augmentation principle
  5. snowball effect
  6. social cryptomnesia
21
Q

explain each step of social change

A
  1. drawing attention= draw attention to situation
  2. consistency= being consistent in opinion etc
  3. deeper processing (of the issue)= activism means that ppl have accepted the status quo + are thinking more deeply about the unjustness of it.
  4. augmentation principle- person takes personal risk or behaves in a way despite having obstacles e.g. racial groups boarding buses etc –> shows strong belief + reinforces their message
  5. snowball effect- minority becomes majority
  6. social cryptomnesia- people have a memory that change occured but don’t remember how it happened/events that led to the change.
22
Q

social change eval 1

A
  • Nolan= research support for normative influences –> aimed to see if they could change ppls energy-use habits by hanging messages on a front door that residents were tryinf to reduce energy usage vs control grp who had a message asing them to save energy but no reference to other ppl –> 1st group had significantly bigger decreases in energy use
    BUT Foxcroft reviewed social norms interventions (70 studies where social norms approach was used to reduce alcohol use–> only found small reductio in drinking quantitiy + no effect on drinking frequency–> suggests normative influence doesn’t always produce change
23
Q

eval point 2 social change

A
  • Nemeth suggests social change is due to the type of thinking that minorities inspire –> when ppl consider minority argumets tehy engage in divergent thinking weighing up pros and cons –> this leads to better decisons to social issues –> shows the value of dissenting minorities as they stimulate new ideas + open minds that majorities can’t do
24
Q

eval 3 social change

A
  • Mackie argues that the role of deeper proessing may not be a role in how minorities bring about social change –> he argues majority influence can create deeper processing if you don’t share same views as you are forced to think about their thoughts + reasoning –> minority infleunce + considering the message does not require deeper processing
25
eval 4
barriers to social change- Bashir - ppl resist social change to not be be associated with stereotypical + minority 'environmentalists' as ppl described them in negatve ways e.g. 'tree-huggers'
26
Asch's experiment
- dissenter present= broke power of majority= encourage others to do likewise= can lead to social change
27
Milgram research
- when confederate teacher refused to give shocks to learner= rate of obedience to genuine obedience dropped
28
what did Zimbardo suggest?
- obedience can be used to create social change through the process of gradual commitment --> once small instruction obeyed it becomes more difficult to resist a bigger one (ppl 'drift' into a new kind of behaviour)