Misrep Flashcards

(20 cards)

1
Q

What’s the difference between fraudulent misrep, negligent misrep and innocent misrep.

A

Fraudulent misrep : (1) knowingly, (2) without belief in its truth, (3) reckless as to its truth or falsity
Negligent misrep: honest belief but without reasonable care
Innocent misrep: honest belief with reasonable care

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What ‘s the basic requirements for misrepresentation

A

(1) false
(2) statement (including conduct)
(3) of a fact
(4) induces the receipt to enter into the contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Can silence be misrepresentation

A

Generally not, except for

(1) active steps to conceal
(2) half truth (already received notice to terminate but still said the farms were fully let)
(3) chance of circumstances (original true statement - untrue) (no including future intention)
(4) fiduciary duty
(5) insured party has a duty to disclose all material facts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Can a statement of opinion be a misrep?

A

depends on whether D is in a better position to know the truth (e.g. sale of hotel describing the tenant as a most desirable tenant)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Can a statement of future intention be a misrep?

A

generally not, except when teh statement maker had no real intention when making the statement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Can a statement of law be a misrep?

A

yes if it is a combination of law and fact

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What constitutes inducts

A

(1) material
(2) known to the representee (directly/indirectly)
(3) intended to be acted upon
(4) actually acted upon

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

will the representor still be liable if the representee has an opportunity to verify the statement

A

it can still constitute inducement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What remedies available for misrep

A

(1) recission (restored to pre-contractual positions); (send notice)
(2) damages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Name four bars to recissions

A

(1) affirmation
(2) lapse of time
(3) impossibility (not strict)
(4) third party interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Will the guarantor be liable to the Bank if the borrower has induced him to sign the gurantee

A

yes if the bank has not put on inquiry and take reasonable steps to explain it to the guarnator

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the differnece between tort of deceit and neg /innocent misrep ? (relevant date)

A

for fradulent misrep, from the time when the fraud is reasonable discovered
for non-fraudulent misrep, from the time of contract formation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What do you have to do if you would like to rescind a contract?

A

Give notice !

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the differnece between tort of deceit and neg /innocent misrep ? (con neg)

A

con neg does not apply to fraudulent misrep

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the loss that can be claimed for tort of deceit

A

reliance loss (BUT NOT expectation loss) –> restore pre-contractual positions as if no misrepresentation but not as if the misrepresentation is true

current position v.s. position (what the representee would(might) have done if there is no misrep)

But no need but for test LOL

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How to prove negligent misrep at common law

A

(1) duty of care (Hedley Byrne, proximity, assumption of responsibility)
(2) breach
(3) causation
(4) loss : all losses that are reasonably foreseeable at the time of the neg mistatement

17
Q

Can damages be rewarded for innocent misrep at common law?

A

NO, the representee can only seek restitution. If restitution turns out to be impossible, representee shall rely on s.3(2) MO for damages.

18
Q

what is Hedly byrne duty of care

A

(1) [holding out] special skill
(2) advice based on that skill
(3) D knows P would rely on that
(4) reliance is reaosnable

19
Q

What’s the difference between neg misrep at common law and in s.3 (1)

A

(1) common law neg misrep has a wide scope to include 3rd party situation
(2) reverse burden of proof - from P to D once there is a false statement of fact, D to prove he has reasonable ground to believe

20
Q

what s.3(2) MO talks about?

A

damages in lieu of recission