MISSED PQs (Torts) Flashcards
Defective Design
A design is defective if…
(1) the risks of the product outweigh its benefits, AND
(2) there was an economically feasible alternative design available
*Georgia rule too
To be liable for Trespass to Land, what knowledge must D have possessed?
Trespass to Land = D intentionally entered another’s land AND P did not consent to D’s entry
**D DID NOT NEED to have ANY knowledge that the property belonged to P OR a belief that entry was permissible
When is someone liable for Private Nuisance?
D is liable for Private Nuisance when…
→ D’s interference with P’s use & enjoyment of property is BOTH:
1) substantial (offensive, annoying, or intolerable to a normal person in the community) AND
2) unreasonable (severity of harm to P outweighs utility of D’s conduct) **e.g., D creating health hazards that harm P outweighs any utility
In the context of a sports game where Player A makes contact with another, explain what defense Player A can raise.
In the context of a sports game where Player A makes contact with Player B, Play A might be able to raise the defense of → Apparent Consent
Apparent Consent = when a reasonable person would have understood P’s conduct OR custom (i.e., accepted behavior in the community) to indicate consent
*BUT, consent is ineffective IF D’s conduct exceeds scope of P’s consent
What are the approaches to who can bring a products liability action based on breach of product warranty?
to bring a Products Liability action based on Breach of Product Warranty…
MAJORITY View: only the purchaser AND members of his family / household have privity extended, and thus only they have standing to sue
*family / household members can ONLY sue for PERSONAL INJURY here
MINORITY View: the purchaser AND anyone reasonably expected to be affected have privity extended, and thus only they have standing to sue
Misappropriation of the Right to Publicity
Misappropriation of the Right to Publicity
= unauthorized use of P’s identity – name, likeness, OR item closely associated with the P – for the D’s benefit (typically, a commercial purpose)
Can a person be liable for making a defamatory statement about a group of people?
→ generally, a person CANNOT be liable for making a defamatory statement about a group of people…
UNLESS:
1) the group is so small that a reasonable person would conclude that the statement refers to that group member; OR
2) the circumstances of publication would cause a reasonable person to conclude that the statement refers to the member
a
= a