Missed Torts Rules Flashcards

(21 cards)

1
Q

Prima Facie case for trespass of land

A

P must prove that:

(i) D’s intent to bring about a physical invasion on P’s land;
(ii) An act by the D pf physical invasion;
(iii) Causation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Is an intent to harm a requirement for trespass of land?

A

An intent to harm or cause injury is not necessary for liability ONLY an intent to enter on the land is req’d.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Intermediary’s Negligence

A

An intermediary’s negligent failure to discover a defect is NOT a superseding cause, and the D who supplied the defective product will be held liable along with the intermediary.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Indemnity in Strict Liability

A

Each supplier of a defective product will be liable to the P, but each has a right of indemnification against all PREVIOUS suppliers in the distribution chain.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

If a person trespasses on someone’s land out of necessity, are they still liable for any damages on the land?

A

Yes, if it is PRIVATE NECESSITY. The person who trespasses may be liable for the damage they have caused.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Parental Duty of Care

A

Under common law, a parent is vicariously liable for the tortious conduct of a child. The parent may be held liable for her own negligence in allowing the child to do something that would harm another person or property.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Proximate Cause

A

As a general rule, the defendant is liable for all harmful acts that are normal incidents of and within the increased risk caused by his acts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Indirect Cause Cases (Prox. Cause)

A

Where indirect cause cases are concerned, an independent intervening force may be foreseeable where the D’s negligence increased the risks that these acts would harm the P.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Criminal Acts by a 3rd Party

A

Criminal acts by a third party do not cut off D’s liability for negligence, if the D’s negligence created a foreseeable risk that a 3rd party would commit the crime.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

(One of the) Duties owed by Doctors to Patients

A

Duty to provide a patient with enough information about the risks of a proposed course of treatment or surgical procedure to enable the patient to make an “informed consent” to the treatment. **NOTE that if this is breached in a fact pattern that there should also be the other elements of negligence for the P to recover (that will distinguish it from a battery)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

If a person trespasses on someone’s land out of necessity, are they still liable for any damages on the land?

A

Yes, if it is PRIVATE NECESSITY. The person who trespasses may be liable for the damage they have caused.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Pure Comparative Negligence

A

Injured P may recover damages from a negligent D no matter how great his own negligence was.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Joint and Several Liability

A

When two or more tortious acts combine to create an indivisible injury, the P can recover the amount of fault from any D.**Keyword being indivisible.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

If a person trespasses on someone’s land out of necessity, are they still liable for any damages on the land?

A

Yes, if it is PRIVATE NECESSITY. The person who trespasses may be liable for the damage they have caused.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Rule of Contribution

A

Under the rule of contribution, any D req’d to pay more than her share of damages has a claim against the other jointly liable party for excess.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

If a person trespasses on someone’s land out of necessity, are they still liable for any damages on the land?

A

Yes, if it is PRIVATE NECESSITY. The person who trespasses may be liable for the damage they have caused.

16
Q

If a person trespasses on someone’s land out of necessity, are they still liable for any damages on the land?

A

Yes, if it is PRIVATE NECESSITY. The person who trespasses may be liable for the damage they have caused.

16
Q

Products Liability Mnemonic (CCC BoND)

A

C - Control (defect existed while in control of manufacturer)
C- Changes (no changes happened to product after it left manufacturer before reaching user)
C- Causation
B- Business (must be a business)
o- n/a
N- no privity requirement
D- Defective

18
Q

When will intervening causes supersede?

A

Intervening causes will supersede when they are UNFORESEEABLE.

18
Q

If a person trespasses on someone’s land out of necessity, are they still liable for any damages on the land?

A

Yes, if it is PRIVATE NECESSITY. The person who trespasses may be liable for the damage they have caused.