Mistake Flashcards

(14 cards)

1
Q

Common
the corn was already destroyed, they did not know that

A

Couturier v. Hastie

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Common
Separation agreement is void if they were actually never married, which they thought they were

A

Galloway v. Galloway

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Common
life insurance policy over a person who was in fact dead would be void

A

Strickland v. Turner

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Common
agreed that the son in the action would be paid around 1/3 or £60,500
It was not a mistake - if they discovered a debt, he would have not insisted on percentage over fixed sum

A

Fitzsimons v. O’Hanlon

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Common
‘essential and integral’ part of the contract

A

Bell v Lever

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Common
Court said it was not void because it still served purpose - did not seek to cancel it immediately
England has now no common mistake in equity

A

Great Peace Shipping Ltd v. Tsavliris

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Common
must relate to facts as they existed at the time
Equity in Ireland
uphold rather than destroy apparent contracts.

A

O’Neill v. Ryan

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Mutual
“full and final settlement of all matters”.
Void totally

A

Mespil v. Capaldi

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Mutual
Each wanted to buy from a different ship, different quality

A

Megaw v. Molloy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Non est factum
mistake was as to the general character of the document

A

Ted Castle McCormack v. McCrystal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Non est factum
had not realised the guarantee he was signing made him liable jointly and severally

A

AIB plc v. McKenna

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Unilateral mistake
The decision between Ingram and Phillips
[I]t [is] wrong that an innocent purchaser (who knew nothing of what passed between the seller and the rogue) should have his title depend on such refinements. After all, he has acted with complete circumspection and entire good faith;

A

Lewis v. Avery

in favor of Phillips v. Brooks

against Ingram v. Little

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Unilateral mistake
Confession after Gardaí concealed their identity
Consent voidable - retract confession

A

DPP v. Dillon

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Unilateral mistake
Wanted to bet 1300 not 13000, won
The agency played the tape bet and made the bet voidable

A

Longley v. PPB Entertainment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly