Module 1 Flashcards
(39 cards)
How does “The Tale of Three Apples Start?”
- MC: Khaleefeh and Jaafar (Khaleefeh’s Wezeer)
- Their goal is to find anyone who is again Khaleefeh and displace them. (223)
- They proceeded along a lane, and saw there an old man, with a net and basket upon his head, and a staff in his hand, reciting verses. (223)
- The old man replied to Khaleefeh: “I am a fisherman, and have a family to maintain, and I went forth from my house at noon, and have remained until now, but God hath alotted me nothing wherewith to obtain food for my household; therefore I have hated myself, and wished for death.” (223)
- Khaleef asked the man to return with them to the river and cast the net for his luck. “If thou wilt do so, I will purchase of thee wheatver cometh up for a hundred pieces of gold.”
- The fisherman dragged back his net from the river, pulling up a chest, locked and heavy. (223)
- Khaleefeh gave the fisherman his hundred pieces of gold and they took back the chest to the palace.
- Jaafar and Mesroor then broke it open, and they found in it a basket of palm-leaves sewed up with red wrosted; they cut the threads and saw within it a piece of carpet, and lifting this, they found beneath it an izar, and when they had taken up the izar they discovered under it a damsel like molten silver, killed and cut in pieces. (223)
- Khaleefeh ordered Jaafar to bring him the man who killed this woman so that he can avenge her upon him, or be crucified at the gate of his palace together with forty of they kinsmen.
- Jaafar asked for 3 days. → but couldn’t find him.
- Khaleefeh called on all those to see the crucifixion of Jaafar and his kinsmen. He gave orders to set up the crosses and placed the Wezeer and his kinsemen beneath to crucify them, and were awaiting the Khaleefeh’s permission… (224)
- While they were waiting, a handsome and neatly-dressed young man came forward through the crowd and admitted to killing the woman in the chest. (224)
- While Jaafar was speaking to this man, an old sheykh pressed through the crowd to him and the young man and admitted that he, himself, was the one who killed the woman. (224)
- The young man said the old man didn’t know what he was saying, and reinstated his own guilt. (225)
- The old man argued that he was old and the other man young and had already been satiated with the world and said that he will be a ransom for thee and for the wezeer and his kinsmen and that he alone killed the woman. (225)
- the Wezeer took both the young man and sheykh to the Khaleefeh. (225) He said the murderer of the woman had come.
- The Khaleefeh asked which one killed her. They both claimed it was each of them alone that had killed her. (225)
What is the Middle of “The Tale of Three Apples Like?”
- The Khaleefeh said to Jafaar “Take them both and crucify them.”
- Jafaar argued that it would be unjust to kill them both if only one was the murderer. (225)
- The young man gave an account of the manner of his killing her, and described what Khaleefeh had found. The Khaleefeh therefore was convinced that the young man was he who had killed the damsel. (225)
- The young man explained: “This damsel was my wife, and the daughter of my uncle: this sheykh was her father, and is my uncle. I married her when she was a virgin….At the commencement of this month she was attacked by a severe illness and was recovered by physicians.” He desired her to be sent to the bath but she said she wanted an apple before taking a bath. (225)
- The young man could not find one. → An old gardener told him it was only in the garden of the Prince of the Faithful at El-Basrah, and preserved there for the Khaleefeh. (226)
- He travelled for 15 days and brought back three apples for her; but she was not pleased by them, and left them by her side. → She then suffered a violent fever, and continued ill during a period of 10 days. Then she recovered her health again. (227)
- A black slave passed him one day, having an apple in his hand → he replied he got it from his sweetheart and told him that he had found her ill and she had three apples and had told him that her husband journeyed to El-Basrah for them (227) and he had taken it from her.
- This filled him with excessive rage and he went back home → he asked her where the apple was and she said she did not know → he thought the slave must be talling the truth, took a knife, and plunged the knife into her. Then he cut off her head and limbs, and put them in the basket in haste, and covered them with izar, over which he laid a piece of carpet and threw the chest into the Tigris. (227)
- The young man begged to hasten his death in retaliation for her murder → bc he had returned home and found his eldest boy crying. The boy said he had taken one of the apples that his mother had, and went down with it into the street to play and a tall black slaves snatched it from him and asked how he had gotten the apple. (227)
- The son told the slave about his father’s journey and how he brought it back from El-Basrah for the sake of his sick mother and the details of it. (227)
- Young Man discovered he had murdered his wife unjustly. (228) and they wept.
How did “The Tales of Three Apples” End?
- The Khaleefeh said he would not put to death any but the wicked slave; for the young man is excusable. (228)
- He called Jaafar to bring him the wicked slave, if not Jaafar should be put to death in his stead. (228)
- Jaafar, in despair hid in this house for 3 days, and on the fourth dat he caused the Kadee to be brought, and made his testamentary arrangements; and as he was bidding farewell to his children, and weeping, lo, the messenger of the Khaleefeh came and said to him that the Prince of the Faithful was in a most violent rage and said: “this day shall not pass until thou art put to death if thou do not bring to him the salve.” (228)
- Jaafar wept and hugged his youngest daughter to him, an in doing so felt something round in her pocket. She said it was an apple → “Our slave Reyhan brought it, and I have had it for four days; he would not give it to me until he had received from me two pieces of gold.” (228)
- He immediately ordered that the salve should be brought before him. (228) → The slave told him about the boy he had taken the apple from and the boy’s father’s journey to El-Basrah. (229)
- He took the slave and went with him to the Khaleefeh, who ordered that the story should be committed to writing and published. (229)
How did the classical detective/crime fiction genre come to be in terms of socio-historical factors?
- Classical detective fiction of the 19th c emerges as the quintessential popular genre of modernity and as a reflection of anxieties associated with the rapidly changing society.
- Its cultural and literacy sources can be traced to earlier genres and print forms such as the mystery story and the Gothic genre, as well as the sensational street literature focusing on crime and punishment.
- Development of the tradition of intellectual deduction in modern Europe; elements of ratiocination: F.-M. Voltaire (Zadig) and W. Godwin
- the context of the Enlightenment; emphasis on the power of reason; popularization of science.
- knowledge becomes more accessible; the rise of the public educational system; growth of print culture; the rise of the encyclopedia.
- acceleration of industrialization and urbanization; the rise of urban crime.
What did H. Worthington, “Criminal Narratives: Textualising Crime” Include?
- Broadsides / broadsheets (street literature, in prose or verse); included descriptions of crimes (eg. burglary, rape, murder, infanticide), criminals, and their punishment (often execution).
- “[T]o sell well, the broadsides had to entertain their audience, and they did so in the case of the criminal narratives by including as much graphic detail or violent crime and equally violent punishment as possible. There was some pretence to a moral and religious tone, but the broadsides made their appeal to the voyeuristic interests of the masses, exposing the gory and sometimes salacious details of the crimes and making public what had been private.”
-“[T]he writers of the criminal broadsides appealed to the.. prurient aspects of their audience, fulfilling the public’s desire for sex and violence whether in the reportage of violent crime or in the accounts of tis equally violent punishment.” - Popular representations of crime and punishment were meant to entertain, generate profit, and “disseminate the spectacle of sovereign power and reinforce its status.” (16)
What connects broadsides and Poe and Arthur Conan Doyle’s “A Study in Scarlet.”
- The stories highlighted the troubling failings of the legal system:
-> “As the old systems of discovering crime and punishing its perpetrators were seen to be failing in the urbanised, industrialized, and increasingly secular world, so the evidence of this failure and the search for a solution to the problem can be found in the criminography of the literary periodicals. With the focus on the individual, proximity and possibility are no longer sufficient proof of criminality; motive and method are required to give meaning to the criminal act. Circumstantial evidence is no longer perceived as wholly reliable, neither are the statements of witnesses to be accepted as the unvarnished truth. The perception of such instabilities in the system is evident in the proliferation of narratives concenred with the wrongful accusation of the innocent.” (19) - The rise of the literary figure of a brilliant detective alleviated teh anxieties over the imperfect practices and the limitations of the police and judicial systems.”
According to Worthington what was common of Broadsides?
- Erasure of individuality and reducing the criminal to a signifier.
- Displacement of the actual crime to a discursive, textual space;
- Commodified crime as a deferred, textual representation that is offered for consumption regardless of class, level of education, gender or age.
According to Worthington, what was Readership of Broadsides like?
- Lower classes, although middle and upper classes had vested interest in the prevention of crime.
- More literate / educated readers had access to books and more factual accounts of crime such as the Newgate Calendars and the fictional narratives of the Newgate novels, as well as periodicals (21).
- “Urban crimes provided the source material, and the ever-increasing urban population offered an audience eager to consume stories that reflected its paranoia about the dangers of city life. In the proliferation of new periodicals, the urban publishing industry supplied the ideal vehicle for an episodic, popular literary from. The conventional critical view is that detective fiction acheived its enormous, enduring popularity bc it put forward accounts for its largely city-dwelling audience. Intended primarily for a bourgeois, conservative readership, early detective fiction, according to the argument, offered a reassuring perspective of urban life, in which through the application of reassuring perspective of urban life, in which through the application of scientific reasoning–‘ratiocination’–the detective renders the city knowable, its mysteries solvable, its relentlessly multiplying lower classes and immigrant populations controllable, its criminals able to be captured.”
What was Edgar Allan Poe’s (1809-1849) Romanticism vs. Enlightenment?
- Arguably, the formula for the classic detective fiction was first articulated by Edgar Allen Poe in the 1840s.
- Romantic sensibilities: individuality; introversion; introspection; the macabre; representation of the city as dark, dirty, threatening.
- The detective’s character as a deviation from the norm; “diseased intelligence”
- The detective’s power of reasoning: genius-like gift vs. skills of analysis and deduction
- Presence of the popular means of dissemination of information: newspapers
- Reason, materialism, intellectual self-sufficiency:
- :neither of us believe in praeternatural events…. the doers of the deed were material, and escaped materiality.”
- “This may be the practice in law, but it is not the usage of reason”
- “An inquiry will afford us amusement” [ie. it is not a matter of justice]
Reading the Murder and the Criminal Body:
- “The crime symbolizes not only an infraction of the law but a disruption of the normal order of society” (Cawelti 83)
- Mutilations: “strange”, “peculiar”, “the unusual horror of the ting”
- The public spectacle of death; death as the ultimate mystery.
- Otherness, non-humanity, animality: “a grotesquerie in horror absolutely alien from humanity, and a voice foreign in tone to the ears of men of many nations, and devoid of all distinct or intelligence syllabification.”
- The threat, disruption of the order comes from the colonies.
- Denounement and the problem of justice: the French sailor is innocent.
What is Urban Modernity like in Poe?
- Poe’s detective as an urban investigator and a reader of the urban space “…roaming far and wide until a late hour, seeking, amid the wild lights and shadows of the populous city, that infinity of mental excitement which quiet observation can afford.”
In Poe, how was the death sensationalized and how were the victims brutalized?
The victims and what was done to them was described in such vivid, morbid detail: “…the corpse thrust, with the head downward, up the chimney; the frightful mutilation of the body of the old lady…” (155)
- re-mentioning the gory details of the scene, “…thrusting her daughter’s corpse up the chimney as it was found…” (156)
- “here is a woman strangled to death by manual strength, and thrust up a chimney, head downward…. In the manner of thrusting the corpse up the chimney, you will admit that there was something excessively outre… think, too, how great must have been that strength which could have thrust the body up such an aperature so forcibly that the united vigour of several persons was found barely sufficient to drag it down!” (162-163)
- “On the hearth were thick tresses–very thick tresses–of grey human hair. These had been torn out by the roots.” (163)
- “The throat of the old lady was not merely cut, but the head absolutely severed from the body; the instrument was a mere razor.” (163)
How were the victims depicted in “The Murders in the Rue Morgue”?
- Madame L’Espanaye and her daughter lived an exceedingly retired life–saw no company–seldom went out–had little use for numerous changes of habiliment. (162)
- loners ->
According to Cawelti, What are Conventions?
“Conventions are elements that are known to both the creator and his audience before” (eg. plot, stereotypical characters and ideas, familiar tropes, and so on).
According to Calwelti, all “cultural products” contain what?
Both conventions and inventions
According to Cawelti, what are inventions?
Uniquely imagined by the creator.
According to Cawelti, what are the cultural functions of conventions and inventions?
“Conventions represent familiar shared images and meanings and…assert an ongoing continuity of values; inventions confront us with a new perception or meaning”
- Cawelti acknowledges, however, that this division is not clear-cut and “many elements lie somewhere along the continuum between the two poles.” (6-7)
- a formula as “a conventional system for structuring cultural products”
- formulas are shaped by cultural and historical contexts and are this fairly limited and specific in terms of their repertoire.
How can the formula of the classical (ratiocinative) detective story be described?
- The formula of the classical detective story “can be described as a conventional way of defining and developing a particular kind of situation or situations. A pattern of action or development of this situation, or certain group of characters and the relations between them, and a setting or type of setting appropriate to the characters and action.”
What was the formula of the classical (ratiocinative) detective story?
- Situation (an unsolved crime and an elucidation of its mystery)
- two main types: murder and crimes associated w/political intrigue
- no empathy/human implications in the context of the victim’s death
- the detective has no personal interest in the crime he is investigating (emotional detachment); solving of the crime is presented as an intellectual exercise. - Pattern of Action
- Introduction of the detective; crime and clues; investigation; announcement of the solution; explanation of the solution; denouement
- the character of the detective is detached from society; the detective is both eccentric and brilliant
- The narrative perspective (the detective’s friend, an average mind)
- One of the main sources of pleasure in the detective’s explanation is “the sense of relief that accompanies the detective’s precise definition and externalization of guilt.” - Characters and relationships
- absence of sympathy or identification with the criminal
- “…instead of laying bare the hidden guilt of bourgeois society the detective-intellectual uses his demonic powers to project the general guilt onto specific and overt acts of particular individuals, thus restoring the serenity of the middle-class social order” (96) - Setting
- construction of space (isolated, close spaces)
What does Arthur Conan Doyle “A Study in Scarlet” represent in detective fiction?
- the “shifting patterns in the literary portrayal of crime”: transformation of crime into a game or puzzle; and growing emphasis on domestic crimes.
- Conan Doyle’s self-reflexive acknowledgement of the existing crime fiction market (eg. his references to Edgar Allan Poe and Emile Gaboriau, who produced five books about M. Lecoq, all in the 1860s)
- ## “A Scandal in Bohemia” (1891) as a turning point in the popularity of the Sherlock Holmes series.
What are some similarities between Poe and Conan Doyle?
- Aestheticization of crime (transformation of solving a crime into a game, a puzzle, and an intellectual exercise showcasing the skill of the “consulting detective”)
- Emphasis of the formula on domestic crime featuring the family circle (moving away from political or social crimes: cf. Poe’s “The Purloined Letter,” which focuses on a politival intrigue); bringing crime into a middle class, bourgeois setting.
- Conan Doyle’s works as a continuation of the tradition established by Poe and a reaction to it.
- Conan Doyle fully established the relation between crime and the family milieu.
What is the Character of Watson like and Watson like as a Narrative Voice?
- Watson’s normativity and conformity to Victorian social values is posited in opposition to Holmes’ eccentricity.
- “To Victorian males… the reference [to the battle of Maiwand, Afghanistan] would signify the most heroic qualities of British manhood in the face of adversity, representing a suitable proving ground for Watson. By including these conventional adventure stories and military references, Doyle masculinizes the ambiguous atmosphere of Study, just as he sterilizes it with the trappings of science, analysis and medicine.” (Bragg)
- Through the character of Watson, Doyle establishes a very specific socio-historical context of Britain (as a long-standing imperial, economic, and political power.)
- Watson as a detective (and Holmes as a puzzle): “I eagerly hailed the little mystery which hung around my companion, and spent much of my time endeavoring to unravel it.
What is according to scholars, the character of Sherlock Holmes like?
- Holmes masculine style is at odds with Victorian normative masculinity
- Holmes’ character is fundamentally marked as other”
- In the character of Holmes Conan Doyle brings together masculine and feminine, public and private spaces.”
What is the significance of Arthur Conan Doyle’s Sherlock Holmes and the Police?
“[The] move towards the celebration of the fictional detective as hero arrived at a time when the Metropolitan Police were not viewed in a particularly positive light. The years preceding the birth of Holmes and the Strand constituted a challenging time for the reputation of London’s police force and detective branch, as both suffered sustained attacks in the national press, with coverage drawing attention to a number of embarassing and worrying failures.”
- “Here in London we have lots of Government detectives and lots of private ones. When these fellows are at fault, they come to me and I manage to put them on the right scent. They lay all the evidence before me, and I am generally able, y the help of my knowledge of the history of crime, to set them straight…”