Module 12: Between-Participants Experimental Designs Flashcards

1
Q

Between-participants design

A

An experiment in which different participants are assigned to each group. The independent variable needs at least two groups in this experiment, most often a control group and experimental group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Posttest-only control group design

A

an experimental design in which the dependent variable is measured after the manipulation of the independent variable. Such as with the memory study in which people receive a device. The manipulation in this case in tested after the experiment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Nonequivalent control group

A

the control group is nonequivalent, using random sampling and random assignment is sufficient enough to address this problem

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

History effect

A

changes in the dependent variable may be due to a historical event (such as corona crisis). Are most likely unrelated to the study but may nonetheless affect the dependent variable.

E.g. stress-reducing program where the posttest is taken during midterm or final exams, may lead to an increase in stress.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Maturation effect

A

Participants mature physically, socially, and cognitively during the course of the study. Any changes in the dependent variable may be due to maturation and not to the independent variable. The control group helps with this, if they change without the treatment you know there is a maturation effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Testing effect

A

Repeated testing within a study may lead to better or worse scores. Although most studies only have pretest and posttest measures, some require more testing. In these cases, participants are exposed to the same or similar tests numerous times. As a result, changes in performance on the test may be due to prior experience with it, not to the independent variable.

  • Practice effect
  • Fatigue effect
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Threats to internal validity

A
  • Nonequivalent control group
  • History effect
  • Maturation effect
  • Testing effect
    • Practice effect
    • Fatigue effect
  • Regression to the mean
  • Instrumentation effect
  • Mortality
  • Diffusion of treatment
  • Experimenter effect (experimenter bias)
    • Single-blind experiment
    • Double-blind experiment
  • Subject (participant) effect
    • Demand characteristics
    • Placebo effect
  • Floor effect
  • Ceiling effect
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Practice effect

A

if participants took the same math test before and after participating in a special math course, the improvement observed in scores might be due to participants familiarity with and practice on the test items

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Fatigue effect

A

Repeated testing fatigues the participants, and their performance declines as a result

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Regression to the mean

A

Statistical regression occurs when individuals are selected for a study because their scores on some measure were extreme, either extremely high or extremely low. Regression to the mean is a threat to internal validity in which extreme scores upon retesting tend to be less extreme, moving toward the mean.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Instrumentation effect

A

occurs when the measuring device is faulty. Problems of consistency are more likely when the measuring instrument is a human observer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Mortality (or attrition)

A

a difference in drop-out rates which results in inequality between the groups.

E.g. Imagine a study to test the effects of a program aimed at reducing smoking. The experimental group participates in the program to reduce smoking, but the heaviest smokers just cannot take its demands and quit. When we take a posttest measure on smoking, only the originally light to moderate smokers are left in the experimental group. Comparing them to the control group is pointless because the groups are no longer equivalent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Diffusion of treatment

A

observed changes in the behaviors of participants may be due to information receives from other participants.

E.g. college students are frequently used as participants in research studies. Because many students live near one another and share classes, some may discuss an experiment in which they participated. If other students are planning to participate in the study in the future, the treatment has now been compromised because they know how some of the participants were treated, and this knowledge may affect how they respond, regardless of the condition to which they are assigned.

Solution: short time span planning or ask the participants not to share the information with others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Experimenter effect (or experimenter bias)

A

the results are biased by the experimenter’s expectations. A researcher may, for example, unknowingly smile more when participants are behaving in the predicted manner and frown or grimace when participants are behaving in an undesirable manner.

Solution:
• Single-blind experiment: either the experimenter or the participants are blind to the manipulation being made
• Double-blind experiment: neither the experimenter nor the participant knows the condition in which the participant is serving; both parties are blind.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Subject (participant) effect

A

the participant, consciously or unconsciously, affects the results of the study. By:
• Demand characteristics: the subjects try to guess what the experimenter wants as characteristics. Single- or double-blind experiment helps to combat subject effects.
• Placebo effect: the improvement may not be due to the effects of the treatment but to the participant’s expectation that the treatment will have an effect.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Floor effect

A

: A limitation of the measuring instrument that decreases its ability to differentiate between scores at the bottom scale. Differences between groups can’t be measured accurately.

E.g. measuring weight of rats in kilo’s instead of grams

17
Q

Ceiling effect

A

A limitation of the measuring instrument that decreases its ability to differentiate between scores at the top of the scale.

E.g. measuring an elephant on a bathroom scale.

18
Q

External validity

A

The extent to which the results of an experiment can be generalized. The following are compound examples.

19
Q

Threats to external validity

A
  • College sophomore problem
  • Artificial criticism
    • Exact replication
    • Conceptual replication
    • Systematic replication
20
Q

College sophomore problem

A

 Most psychology research is conducted on young participants with a late adolescent mentality who are still developing their own identities and attitudes. They are hardly a representative sample of the population.

Pro:

  • Does not negate the studies findings, but it does need to be replicated
  • In sensory research this is not an issue
  • Population of students is very varied nowadays, different socioeconomic backgrounds, etc.
21
Q

Artificial criticism

A

Conducting research in a laboratory setting enables us to maximize control, but control also has the potential disadvantage of creating an artificial environment. So, we need to exercise caution when generalizing from the laboratory setting to the real world. Types:

  • Exact replication
  • Conceptual replication
  • Systematic replication
22
Q

Exact replication

A

a way to address artificiality criticism and generalization issue. Replication of the experiment to demonstrate the result is reliable.

23
Q

Conceptual replication

A

a study based on another study that uses different methods, a different manipulation, or a different measure. Testing the same concept but in a different way.

24
Q

Systematic replication

A

systematically changes one thing at a time and observes the effect, if any, on the results

E.g. a study could be replicated with more or different participants, in a more realistic setting, or with more levels of the independent variable