Module 2: The ESG Market Quiz Flashcards

(29 cards)

1
Q

Quiz #1 NO.1
What does the 2022 Morningstar survey indicate about the significance of ESG factors to institutional asset owners?

A. ESG factors are “fairly material” to “very material” to their total portfolio.

B. ESG factors are “not material” to their total portfolio.

C. ESG factors are “slightly material” to their total portfolio.

A

Explanation:
The 2022 Morningstar survey highlights the growing importance of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors for institutional asset owners. The survey indicates that a majority of institutional investors recognize ESG factors as “fairly material” to “very material” in managing their total portfolios. This reflects the increasing understanding that ESG considerations are critical for long-term investment performance, risk management, and alignment with stakeholder expectations.

Why A is correct:
Institutional asset owners, such as pension funds, sovereign wealth funds, and insurers, are increasingly integrating ESG factors into their decision-making because these factors can significantly impact financial returns and risks.
The survey results confirm that ESG is no longer a niche consideration but a core element of portfolio management for many institutional investors.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Quiz #1 NO.2
What creates a multiplier effect throughout the investment market in terms of ESG investing?

A. The level of ESG training provided to asset managers

B. The total AUM of asset managers

C. The effective implementation of responsible investment by individual asset owners

A

C. The effective implementation of responsible investment by individual asset owners

Explanation:
The multiplier effect in ESG investing occurs when individual asset owners (such as pension funds, insurance companies, or sovereign wealth funds) effectively implement responsible investment practices. These large institutional investors influence the broader investment market because of their significant capital allocations and expectations for ESG integration across their portfolios. Their leadership sets the tone for how asset managers, companies, and other market participants prioritize ESG considerations.

Why C is correct:
Individual asset owners have significant influence in the financial markets due to their capital and mandate requirements.
When these asset owners demand responsible investment practices (e.g., ESG integration, sustainable disclosures, or climate risk assessments), it prompts asset managers to adopt similar practices.
This influence trickles down throughout the investment value chain, creating a multiplier effect that drives ESG adoption at scale.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Quiz #1 NO.3
With regard to ESG investing, financial regulators are most likely to:

A. act as fiduciaries.

B. participate in collective engagements on behalf of beneficiaries.

C. consider how ESG factors might influence the long-term risk–return profile of financial instruments.

A

C. consider how ESG factors might influence the long-term risk–return profile of financial instruments.

Explanation:
Financial regulators play a critical role in ensuring the stability and integrity of financial markets. In the context of ESG investing, regulators are increasingly focusing on how ESG factors (e.g., climate risk, social issues, governance practices) might impact the long-term risk–return profile of financial instruments and the overall financial system. This involves setting guidelines, promoting transparency, and encouraging the integration of ESG factors into financial decision-making to mitigate systemic risks and ensure sustainable economic growth.

Why C is correct:
Long-term risks and returns: ESG factors, such as climate change or poor corporate governance, can create financial risks that affect the long-term performance of financial instruments. Regulators are likely to assess these risks to protect market stability and investor interests.
Examples include mandating climate-related financial disclosures (e.g., TCFD recommendations) or stress-testing financial institutions for climate-related risks.

Why the other options are incorrect:
A. Act as fiduciaries: Financial regulators are not fiduciaries. Fiduciary duty applies to asset managers, trustees, or other entities managing investments on behalf of beneficiaries. Regulators oversee markets and enforce rules but do not act as fiduciaries.

B. Participate in collective engagements on behalf of beneficiaries: Financial regulators do not directly engage with companies on ESG issues or act on behalf of beneficiaries. This is typically the role of asset managers or institutional investors.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Quiz #1 NO.4
Which of the following stakeholders directly influences investment decisions through the choices they make or the services/information they provide in the context of responsible investment?

A. Retail customers

B. Local community leaders

C. Government

A

A. Retail customers

Explanation:
In the context of responsible investment, stakeholders who directly influence investment decisions are those whose actions, choices, or contributions impact how capital is allocated. Retail customers play a direct role because their preferences for sustainable and responsible investment products drive demand, prompting asset managers, advisors, and investment firms to offer ESG-aligned products to meet those preferences. This directly influences investment decisions and flows within financial markets.

Why A. Retail customers is correct:
Direct influence: Retail customers influence investment decisions through their choices, such as investing in ESG funds, selecting ethical products, or voicing preferences for sustainable investments.
Financial institutions respond to this demand by creating ESG-focused financial products, which shapes asset allocation and investment strategies.
Why the other options are incorrect:
B. Local community leaders: While local community leaders can influence public opinion and advocate for ESG-related issues (e.g., promoting sustainability initiatives or raising awareness of social concerns), they do not directly influence investment decisions.

C. Government: Governments influence responsible investment indirectly by setting regulations, policies, and incentives (e.g., carbon pricing, mandatory ESG disclosures). However, they do not directly participate in investment decisions like retail customers do.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Quiz #1 NO.5
Which of the following established a framework that lays out the conditions for economic activities to be considered environmentally sustainable?

A. EU Taxonomy Regulation

B. Climate Disclosure Standards Board

C. Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures

A

A. EU Taxonomy Regulation

Explanation:
The EU Taxonomy Regulation is a classification system established by the European Union to define the criteria under which economic activities can be considered environmentally sustainable. It provides a framework for determining whether an investment is aligned with the EU’s environmental objectives, such as climate change mitigation, climate change adaptation, and biodiversity protection. The regulation aims to guide investors, companies, and policymakers in identifying activities that contribute to environmental goals, thereby promoting transparency and reducing greenwashing.

Why A. EU Taxonomy Regulation is correct:
The EU Taxonomy establishes specific conditions and technical screening criteria for economic activities to qualify as environmentally sustainable.
It is a cornerstone of the EU’s sustainable finance strategy, ensuring consistency and clarity for market participants.
Why the other options are incorrect:
B. Climate Disclosure Standards Board (CDSB): The CDSB is focused on providing a framework for companies to disclose environmental and climate-related information in financial reports. It does not establish criteria for labeling activities as environmentally sustainable.

C. Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD): The TCFD provides recommendations for companies to disclose climate-related financial risks and opportunities. Like the CDSB, it focuses on improving transparency but does not define what qualifies as environmentally sustainable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Quiz #1 NO.6
An ESG government policy with a “comply and explain” approach suggests that:

A. ESG integration for supervised entities is voluntary.

B. ESG integration at a country level is at a mature stage.

C. the country is applying less stringent ESG requirements than countries that apply a “comply or explain” approach.

A

A. ESG integration for supervised entities is voluntary.

Explanation:
A “comply and explain” policy approach means that entities are encouraged to comply with ESG-related guidelines or requirements, but if they choose not to comply, they must provide an explanation for their non-compliance. This approach is less stringent than mandatory regulations or a “comply or explain” approach, as it allows for non-compliance without significant penalties, making ESG integration voluntary in practice.

Why A. ESG integration for supervised entities is voluntary is correct:
In a “comply and explain” framework, entities are not legally required to integrate ESG practices but are expected to explain their reasons if they do not.
This approach provides flexibility for organizations and encourages voluntary adoption of ESG practices rather than imposing strict compliance.
Why the other options are incorrect:
B. ESG integration at a country level is at a mature stage: This is incorrect because a “comply and explain” approach typically reflects an early-stage policy framework, where ESG integration is encouraged but not yet mandatory. A mature ESG framework would likely involve stricter requirements or mandatory disclosures.

C. The country is applying less stringent ESG requirements than countries that apply a “comply or explain” approach: This is incorrect because “comply and explain” is less stringent than “comply or explain”. In a “comply or explain” framework, entities must either comply or provide a justification for non-compliance, which imposes a greater accountability burden.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Quiz #1 NO.7
Insurance companies are best categorized as:

A. asset owners.

B. savings funds.

C. intermediaries.

A

A. asset owners.

Explanation:
Insurance companies are best categorized as asset owners because they manage large pools of capital, which they invest to meet their future liabilities (e.g., paying claims). They hold significant assets under management (AUM) and play a crucial role in the financial markets by allocating capital to different asset classes, often incorporating ESG considerations into their investment strategies.

Why A. asset owners is correct:
Insurance companies collect premiums from policyholders and invest these funds to generate returns that can cover future obligations (e.g., claims and benefits).
As asset owners, they make strategic decisions about how to allocate their capital, often influencing asset managers and the broader investment ecosystem.
Why the other options are incorrect:
B. savings funds: This is incorrect because insurance companies are not primarily savings vehicles. While they do offer certain savings-like products (e.g., annuities), their primary function is risk management and asset ownership, not serving as savings funds.

C. intermediaries: This is incorrect because intermediaries are entities like brokers or asset managers that facilitate transactions or manage investments on behalf of asset owners. Insurance companies, as asset owners, directly manage or oversee their portfolios rather than acting as intermediaries.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Quiz #1 NO.8
Which of the following parties holds the ultimate fiduciary responsibility (最終受託責任) for a pension fund?

A. Trustees

B. Auditors

C. Senior executives

A

A. Trustees

Explanation:
In the context of a pension fund, trustees hold the ultimate fiduciary responsibility. Trustees are legally and ethically obligated to act in the best interests of the beneficiaries of the pension fund. They are responsible for overseeing the governance, investment strategy, and administration of the fund, ensuring that it meets its obligations to provide retirement benefits to its members.

Why A. Trustees is correct:
Trustees are appointed to manage the pension fund on behalf of the beneficiaries.
Their fiduciary duties include acting with prudence, loyalty, and care in managing the assets of the fund.
They are ultimately accountable for ensuring that the fund complies with legal and regulatory requirements, as well as adhering to its stated objectives.
Why the other options are incorrect:
B. Auditors: Auditors are responsible for reviewing and verifying the financial statements and practices of the pension fund. While they play an important role in ensuring transparency and accuracy, they do not hold fiduciary responsibility for the fund.

C. Senior executives: Senior executives (e.g., the CEO or CIO of the pension fund) are responsible for implementing the strategies and decisions made by the trustees. While they have significant operational responsibilities, they do not hold ultimate fiduciary responsibility, which lies with the trustees.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Quiz #1 NO.9
What significantly drives the amount and quality of ESG investing in the investment value chain?

A. The choices of external asset managers

B. The approach and understanding of ESG factors by asset owners

C. The regulations set by government bodies

A

B. The approach and understanding of ESG factors by asset owners

Explanation:
In the investment value chain, asset owners (e.g., pension funds, insurance companies, sovereign wealth funds) play a critical role in driving the amount and quality of ESG investing. Their approach to ESG factors—such as their understanding, commitment, and incorporation of ESG principles—significantly influences how capital is allocated and how asset managers integrate ESG considerations into investment decisions. Asset owners typically set the expectations and guidelines for ESG integration, which trickles down to asset managers and other participants in the value chain.

Why B. The approach and understanding of ESG factors by asset owners is correct:
Asset owners have ultimate control over capital allocation and set mandates for how their funds are managed, including ESG criteria.
A strong understanding of ESG factors by asset owners can lead to more robust ESG strategies and better-quality investment outcomes.
Their influence extends to external asset managers, investee companies, and other stakeholders, driving systemic change in ESG integration.
Why the other options are incorrect:
A. The choices of external asset managers: While asset managers play a vital role, they are often guided by mandates and expectations set by asset owners. Without clear direction from asset owners, asset managers may not prioritize ESG integration.

C. The regulations set by government bodies: Regulations are an important external driver of ESG investing, but they do not directly determine the quality of ESG integration. Asset owners’ leadership in adopting ESG principles often goes beyond regulatory requirements and has a more direct impact on investment outcomes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Quiz #1 NO.10
Which of the following asset classes has the highest allocation of global ESG integrated investment strategies?

A. Real estate

B. Listed equity

C. Fixed income

A

B. Listed equity

Explanation:
Globally, listed equity has the highest allocation of ESG-integrated investment strategies. This is because equities are a primary asset class for institutional and retail investors, and ESG integration in equities is well-established compared to other asset classes. Investors often focus on listed equity as it provides greater transparency through publicly available disclosures, easier access to ESG data, and frequent shareholder engagement opportunities.

Why B. Listed equity is correct:
Transparency: Publicly listed companies are required to disclose financial and non-financial information, including ESG-related data, making it easier for investors to assess and integrate ESG factors.
Engagement opportunities: Shareholders can actively engage with companies to influence ESG practices and vote on ESG-related proposals.
Market size: Listed equities represent a significant portion of global financial markets, making them a natural focus for ESG integration.
Why the other options are incorrect:
A. Real estate: While ESG is increasingly being integrated into real estate investments (e.g., sustainable buildings, green certifications), the allocation to ESG strategies in this asset class is much smaller compared to listed equity.

C. Fixed income: Fixed income (e.g., bonds) is the second-largest asset class for ESG integration, especially with the rise of green bonds and sustainability-linked bonds. However, it still lags behind listed equity in terms of overall ESG integration due to historically limited ESG data and engagement opportunities in the fixed income space.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Quiz #2 NO.1
Investment mandates are important for ESG investing because they (投資授權對ESG投資很重要):

A. define the requirements of asset owners with regard to ESG issues.

B. require asset managers to report on the ESG ratings of their funds.

C. require asset managers to report on the impact of ESG issues on financial performance.

A

A. define the requirements of asset owners with regard to ESG issues.

Explanation:
Investment mandates are contractual agreements between asset owners (e.g., pension funds, insurance companies) and asset managers that outline the specific requirements and expectations for managing assets. In the context of ESG investing, these mandates are critical because they explicitly define how ESG factors should be incorporated into investment decision-making, portfolio construction, and reporting.

Asset owners use these mandates to ensure their ESG goals and values are implemented and aligned with their overall strategy.

Why A. define the requirements of asset owners with regard to ESG issues is correct:
Asset owners often set ESG-related objectives (e.g., reducing carbon emissions, improving social impact, or adhering to specific sustainability standards) in the investment mandate.
These mandates guide asset managers, ensuring that their investment decisions align with the ESG goals and fiduciary responsibilities of the asset owners.
Without clear investment mandates, there may be inconsistency or lack of accountability in ESG integration.
Why the other options are incorrect:
B. require asset managers to report on the ESG ratings of their funds: While reporting may be part of the mandate, the primary purpose of investment mandates is to define the overall requirements and expectations for ESG integration, not just reporting on ESG ratings.

C. require asset managers to report on the impact of ESG issues on financial performance: Although mandates may include expectations for reporting ESG-related impacts, this is only one aspect of a broader set of requirements. The mandate’s primary role is to outline the ESG goals and integration approach, not just performance reporting.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Quiz #2 NO.2
How are insurers double exposed to climate risks?

A. Increased insurance premiums and decreased investment returns

B. Liability from property and casualty insurance and re-pricing of assets

C. Decreased life insurance premiums and increased re-insurance premiums

A

B. Liability from property and casualty insurance and re-pricing of assets

Explanation:
Insurers are double exposed to climate risks because they face risks on both sides of their balance sheet:

Underwriting risks (liabilities): Insurers provide coverage for property, casualty, and other risks that are directly impacted by climate change (e.g., increased frequency and severity of natural disasters like hurricanes, floods, and wildfires). This increases the liabilities they may need to pay out for claims.

Investment risks (assets): Insurers invest the premiums they collect in financial markets, including assets that can be negatively affected by climate risks, such as re-pricing of carbon-intensive assets (e.g., fossil fuel companies) or economic disruptions caused by climate-related events.

This dual exposure means insurers must account for both the liability risks from policies they underwrite and the asset risks from their investment portfolios when managing climate risk.

Why B. Liability from property and casualty insurance and re-pricing of assets is correct:
Property and casualty insurance: Climate change directly impacts liabilities by increasing the likelihood and severity of insured events (e.g., property damage from storms or floods).
Re-pricing of assets: Climate risks, such as the transition to a low-carbon economy or physical damage, can devalue assets in insurers’ investment portfolios.
Why the other options are incorrect:
A. Increased insurance premiums and decreased investment returns: While insurers may raise premiums in response to climate risks, this does not fully capture the “double exposure.” The term refers specifically to liability risks and investment risks rather than premium adjustments.

C. Decreased life insurance premiums and increased re-insurance premiums: This option focuses on specific aspects of the insurance business but does not address the broader concept of double exposure to both underwriting and investment risks.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Quiz #2 NO.3
Regulations requiring financial service providers to explicitly take stock of investors’ ESG preferences:

A. are limited to public equities.

B. have been introduced in the EU.

C. are widely implemented globally.

A

B. have been introduced in the EU.

Explanation:
In the European Union (EU), regulations have been introduced that require financial service providers to explicitly assess and document investors’ ESG preferences as part of their client suitability assessments. This is a key aspect of the EU’s Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) and related updates to the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II). These initiatives are part of the EU’s broader strategy to promote sustainable finance and ensure that ESG considerations are integrated into investment advice and portfolio management.

Why B. have been introduced in the EU is correct:
The EU Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) and MiFID II require financial advisors and portfolio managers to assess and document their clients’ ESG preferences during the advisory process.
These regulations aim to integrate ESG into decision-making processes and to align investments with clients’ sustainability goals.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Quiz #2 NO.4
In contrast to the Japanese market, which sustainable investing strategy does the US market appear most likely to follow Japan’s lead on in terms of AUM?

A. ESG integration

B. Corporate engagement and shareholder action

C. Negative/exclusionary screening

A

B. Corporate engagement and shareholder action

Explanation:
The US market is most likely to follow Japan’s lead in adopting corporate engagement and shareholder action as a key sustainable investing strategy in terms of assets under management (AUM). Both markets place significant emphasis on using shareholder power to influence corporate behavior and improve ESG practices. In Japan, this approach has gained traction due to reforms aimed at improving corporate governance and promoting long-term value creation. Similarly, in the US, there is increasing activity around shareholder resolutions, proxy voting, and direct engagement with companies on ESG issues.

Why B. Corporate engagement and shareholder action is correct:
Japan’s focus: Japan has seen significant growth in corporate engagement as an ESG strategy, driven in part by the Stewardship Code and Corporate Governance Code, which encourage institutional investors to actively engage with companies.
US trends: The US has a strong tradition of shareholder activism, and ESG-related resolutions have grown in prominence. Investors increasingly use corporate engagement to influence governance practices, climate strategies, and social issues.
Both markets share a growing emphasis on active ownership to drive ESG improvements.
Why the other options are incorrect:
A. ESG integration: ESG integration is a widely used strategy globally, including in both Japan and the US, but the US market is already a leader in this area. Following Japan’s lead is less relevant here because ESG integration is already well-established in the US.

C. Negative/exclusionary screening: Japan has not been a major adopter of negative screening compared to regions like Europe. The Japanese market generally focuses more on engagement and integration rather than exclusionary approaches. Similarly, the US market does not heavily rely on negative screening relative to other ESG strategies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Quiz #2 NO.5
Which of the following investment strategies is most popular according to the 2022 GSIA data?

A. ESG integration

B. Impact investing

C. Corporate engagement and shareholder action

Corporate engagement and shareholder action are used to manage over USD8 trillion of assets and are particularly prominent in Japanese and US markets. Much smaller volumes are managed using impact investing, and ESG integration was the second-most popular strategy in 2022 according to GSIA.

A

A. ESG integration

Explanation:
According to the 2022 Global Sustainable Investment Alliance (GSIA) data, ESG integration is the most popular sustainable investing strategy globally in terms of assets under management (AUM). This strategy involves systematically incorporating environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors into financial analysis and investment decisions to enhance risk-adjusted returns.

Why A. ESG integration is correct:
ESG integration has become the dominant strategy because it is flexible and can be applied across all asset classes and sectors. It does not require excluding investments but instead enhances traditional investment analysis by including ESG factors.
This approach is widely used by institutional investors, asset managers, and financial advisors due to its adaptability and alignment with fiduciary duties.
The 2022 GSIA report highlights that ESG integration continues to grow in popularity, surpassing other strategies like exclusionary screening or impact investing.
Why the other options are incorrect:
B. Impact investing: While impact investing is growing in popularity, it represents a smaller proportion of AUM compared to ESG integration. Impact investing typically focuses on generating measurable social or environmental benefits alongside financial returns and is often limited to niche markets.

C. Corporate engagement and shareholder action: Corporate engagement is an important strategy but accounts for a smaller share of global sustainable investing AUM compared to ESG integration. It is often used as a complementary strategy alongside others like ESG integration.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Quiz #2 NO.6
How are pension fund beneficiaries most likely to influence responsible investment?

A. They act in the interest of sustainable companies.

B. Their investment direction to pension fund executives must be implemented.

C. Their ethical preferences may be taken into account within investment policies.

A

C. Their ethical preferences may be taken into account within investment policies.

Explanation:
Pension fund beneficiaries can influence responsible investment primarily through their ethical preferences, which may be considered when pension funds develop their investment policies. While beneficiaries typically do not have direct control over specific investment decisions, their expressed preferences and values (e.g., prioritizing sustainable or socially responsible investing) can guide the overarching strategy and policies of the fund.

Why C. Their ethical preferences may be taken into account within investment policies is correct:
Pension fund executives and trustees have a fiduciary duty to act in the best financial interests of the beneficiaries. However, they may also incorporate the beneficiaries’ ethical preferences into responsible investment policies, as long as these preferences align with the fund’s fiduciary obligations.
Surveys, consultations, or other feedback mechanisms are often used to gauge beneficiaries’ views on ESG issues, which can help shape investment strategies.
This approach balances the beneficiaries’ preferences with the fund’s long-term financial objectives.
Why the other options are incorrect:
A. They act in the interest of sustainable companies: Beneficiaries do not act directly on behalf of sustainable companies. Instead, their influence is indirect, primarily through their expressed preferences and the actions of pension fund managers.

B. Their investment direction to pension fund executives must be implemented: Beneficiaries typically do not have the authority to direct specific investment decisions. Pension fund executives and trustees retain decision-making power, guided by fiduciary responsibilities and investment policies.

17
Q

Quiz #2 NO.7
Which of the following challenges is the greatest limiter in the development of ESG investing?

A. Lack of ESG indexes for benchmarking

B. Lack of clear signals from asset owners that they are interested in ESG investing

C. Slower adoption of ESG investing by institutional investors compared to retail investors

A

B. Lack of clear signals from asset owners that they are interested in ESG investing

Explanation:
The greatest limiter in the development of ESG investing is the lack of clear signals from asset owners—such as pension funds, sovereign wealth funds, and foundations—that they prioritize ESG considerations. Asset owners are at the top of the investment value chain, and their priorities strongly influence asset managers and the broader market. Without clear mandates or strong interest from asset owners, ESG integration and sustainable investing strategies struggle to gain momentum, even if other supporting elements (e.g., ESG indexes or retail demand) exist.

Why B. Lack of clear signals from asset owners that they are interested in ESG investing is correct:
Asset owners drive the market: They allocate significant capital and set mandates for asset managers. If asset owners don’t prioritize ESG, it limits the development and adoption of ESG investing.
Impact on the value chain: When asset owners express interest in ESG, it triggers changes throughout the investment ecosystem, including the creation of ESG products, strategies, and benchmarks.
Systemic barriers: Some asset owners may lack awareness, confidence, or a clear understanding of how ESG contributes to long-term value, leading to slower adoption.

18
Q

Quiz #2 NO.8
Which of the following had the highest reported proportion of sustainable investing in 2022 relative to total managed assets?

A. Japan

B. Europe

C. Canada

A

C. Canada

Explanation:
According to the 2022 Global Sustainable Investment Review (GSIR) by the Global Sustainable Investment Alliance (GSIA), Canada reported the highest proportion of sustainable investing relative to total managed assets. Canada has consistently been a leader in sustainable investing, with a significant percentage of its total assets under management (AUM) incorporating ESG considerations.

Why C. Canada is correct:
In 2022, Canada had one of the highest proportions of sustainable investing relative to total managed assets, reflecting the strong emphasis by Canadian institutional investors on ESG integration and other sustainable investment strategies.
The Canadian investment industry has built momentum around sustainable investing practices, driven by regulatory developments, investor demand, and leadership from asset managers and pension funds.
Why the other options are incorrect:
A. Japan: While sustainable investing is growing in Japan, it represents a smaller proportion of total AUM compared to Canada and Europe. Japan’s sustainable investing market has been expanding but remains at an earlier stage of development.

B. Europe: Europe is the largest sustainable investing market by total AUM, but relative to total managed assets, Canada has a higher proportion of sustainable investing. Europe’s sustainable investments are significant but represent a slightly smaller proportion compared to Canada’s total AUM.

19
Q

Quiz #2 NO.9
Relative to institutional investors, retail investors’ share of sustainable investing assets has:

A. decreased.

B. remained the same.

C. increased.

A

C. increased.

Explanation:
According to the 2022 Global Sustainable Investment Review (GSIR), the share of sustainable investing assets held by retail investors has increased relative to institutional investors. This reflects a growing interest among individual investors in aligning their investments with personal values and sustainability goals. Retail investors are driving demand for ESG-focused funds and investment products, aided by increased awareness, improved access to sustainable investment options, and regulatory shifts promoting transparency.

Why C. increased is correct:
The retail segment is increasingly contributing to sustainable investing growth as ESG products become more accessible through mutual funds, ETFs, and robo-advisors.
Rising awareness of climate change, social issues, and governance practices has motivated retail investors to integrate ESG considerations into their portfolios.
Regulatory changes in regions like the EU (e.g., MiFID II requirements to assess ESG preferences) have further accelerated retail participation.
Why the other options are incorrect:
A. decreased: The retail share of sustainable investing has not decreased; instead, it has grown due to increased demand and product availability.
B. remained the same: The share has not remained static. Retail investors are driving a notable shift in the sustainable investing landscape, increasing their influence relative to institutional investors.

20
Q

Quiz #2 NO.10
Which of the following statements about ESG indexes is most accurate?

A. There are fewer than 20 ESG indexes globally.

B. The first ESG index was the MSCI KLD 400 Social Index.

C. ESG indexes launched around the same time as actively managed ESG funds.

A

B. The first ESG index was the MSCI KLD 400 Social Index.

Explanation:
The MSCI KLD 400 Social Index, launched in 1990, was the first ESG index and remains a significant milestone in the history of ESG investing. This index was designed to track companies that meet environmental, social, and governance (ESG) criteria while avoiding certain industries, such as tobacco and weapons. It paved the way for the development of other ESG indexes and the broader integration of ESG factors into investing.

Why B. The first ESG index was the MSCI KLD 400 Social Index is correct:
The MSCI KLD 400 Social Index (originally created by KLD Research & Analytics, later acquired by MSCI) was the first of its kind and is widely recognized as the starting point for ESG indexing.
It marked the beginning of systematic approaches to ESG investing through index funds, which helped investors align their portfolios with ESG values.
Why the other options are incorrect:
A. There are fewer than 20 ESG indexes globally: This is incorrect as there are hundreds of ESG indexes globally today. Major providers like MSCI, FTSE Russell, S&P Dow Jones, and others have developed numerous ESG indexes tailored to different regions, sectors, and investment strategies.

C. ESG indexes launched around the same time as actively managed ESG funds: ESG indexes were created before the widespread adoption of actively managed ESG funds. The launch of the MSCI KLD 400 Social Index in 1990 predates the broader development of actively managed ESG strategies.

21
Q

Quiz #3 NO.1
The Common Ground Taxonomy (CGT) established by the EU and China aims to:

A. increase the level of transparency for investors.

B. establish a shared understanding of what constitutes a green economic activity.

C. reduce the carbon footprint of both regions.

A

B. establish a shared understanding of what constitutes a green economic activity.

Explanation:
The Common Ground Taxonomy (CGT) is a collaborative effort between the European Union (EU) and China to create a shared framework for identifying and defining green economic activities. The goal is to harmonize sustainability standards across these regions, facilitating cross-border sustainable investments and improving comparability between the EU and China’s taxonomies.

Why B. establish a shared understanding of what constitutes a green economic activity is correct:
The CGT was developed to create alignment between the EU’s Sustainable Finance Taxonomy and China’s Green Bond Endorsed Projects Catalogue.
It provides a common language for defining green economic activities, helping investors and stakeholders understand which activities are considered environmentally sustainable in both regions.
While the two taxonomies were developed independently, the CGT seeks to identify overlapping areas to reduce confusion and barriers for international investors.
Why the other options are incorrect:
A. increase the level of transparency for investors: Although the CGT improves clarity around green investments, its primary purpose is to harmonize definitions, not solely to enhance transparency. Transparency is a secondary benefit, not the main goal.

C. reduce the carbon footprint of both regions: While the CGT indirectly supports decarbonization by promoting green investments, its primary aim is to align definitions of green activities—not directly reduce carbon emissions.

22
Q

Quiz #3 NO.2
How has the ESG offering by asset managers evolved over time?

A. It started with active funds invested in listed equities and evolved to other asset classes and passive investing.

B. It started with passive investing and evolved to active funds invested in listed equities.

C. It has remained constant and focused on listed equities.

A

A. It started with active funds invested in listed equities and evolved to other asset classes and passive investing.

Explanation:
Historically, ESG offerings by asset managers began with active funds focusing on listed equities. This was due to the relative ease of applying ESG analysis to public companies with available ESG data. Over time, as interest in sustainable investing grew and ESG data improved, asset managers expanded their offerings to include a broader range of asset classes (e.g., fixed income, private equity, real assets) and passive investing strategies (e.g., ESG-focused index funds and ETFs).

Why A. It started with active funds invested in listed equities and evolved to other asset classes and passive investing is correct:
Early ESG focus: Initial ESG investments were primarily in actively managed equity funds, where asset managers could apply ESG considerations through detailed research and engagement with companies.
Expansion to other asset classes: As ESG demand increased, asset managers expanded to fixed income, real estate, and infrastructure, integrating ESG factors into these markets.
Rise of passive ESG investing: More recently, ESG-focused passive strategies (such as ETFs and index funds) have gained popularity due to their lower costs and accessibility for retail investors.
This evolution reflects growing sophistication and innovation in ESG offerings.
Why the other options are incorrect:
B. It started with passive investing and evolved to active funds invested in listed equities: This is incorrect because active ESG funds came first. Passive ESG investing (e.g., ETFs) emerged later, as demand for low-cost ESG products grew.

C. It has remained constant and focused on listed equities: This is incorrect because ESG investing has diversified significantly over time, moving beyond listed equities to include multiple asset classes and passive strategies.

23
Q

Quiz #3 NO.3
Stock exchanges can best support the advancement of ESG investing by:

A. assessing the ESG characteristics of a listed security.

B. increasing ESG disclosure requirements for listed securities.

C. integrating ESG considerations within their voting recommendations.

A

B. increasing ESG disclosure requirements for listed securities.

Explanation:
Stock exchanges play a critical role in advancing ESG investing by requiring listed companies to disclose ESG-related information. Enhanced disclosure ensures that investors have access to consistent, comparable, and reliable ESG data, which is essential for making informed investment decisions. By mandating ESG reporting, stock exchanges can improve transparency and encourage companies to adopt sustainable business practices.

Why B. increasing ESG disclosure requirements for listed securities is correct:
Transparency: Increased ESG disclosure requirements enable investors to evaluate the sustainability and risks of companies more effectively.
Global alignment: Many stock exchanges worldwide are adopting ESG disclosure frameworks aligned with international standards (e.g., GRI, TCFD, or ISSB).
Regulatory influence: Exchanges can lead the way in improving corporate ESG practices by setting mandatory reporting requirements for listed companies.
This directly supports ESG investing by providing high-quality data for analysis and decision-making.
Why the other options are incorrect:
A. assessing the ESG characteristics of a listed security: While stock exchanges can provide platforms or tools to assess ESG characteristics, their primary role is to facilitate disclosure rather than directly evaluate securities’ ESG performance.

C. integrating ESG considerations within their voting recommendations: Stock exchanges do not typically make voting recommendations. Proxy advisory firms and asset managers are responsible for incorporating ESG factors into voting decisions.

24
Q

Quiz #3 NO.4
Why have funds of infrastructure, real estate, private equity, and private credit been slower in conducting ESG integration?

A. Because they have no interest in ESG considerations

B. Because it is difficult to get consistent ESG data from portfolio holdings

C. Because they prioritize active investment over passive investment

A

B. Because it is difficult to get consistent ESG data from portfolio holdings

Explanation:
Funds in infrastructure, real estate, private equity, and private credit have been slower to integrate ESG considerations largely due to the difficulty in obtaining consistent and reliable ESG data from their portfolio holdings. Unlike public markets (e.g., listed equities), where ESG disclosure standards are more developed and data is more readily available, these asset classes often involve private companies or assets that are not subject to the same disclosure requirements. This lack of standardization and transparency makes ESG integration more challenging.

Why B. Because it is difficult to get consistent ESG data from portfolio holdings is correct:
Private markets lack disclosure requirements: Many private companies and assets are not required to report ESG information, making it harder for fund managers to evaluate their ESG performance comprehensively.
Data inconsistency: Even when ESG data is available, it is often inconsistent, unverified, or not comparable across private holdings.
Focus on operational ESG factors: Asset managers in these sectors often need to rely on their own due diligence and operational assessments to evaluate ESG risks, which is more resource-intensive than using readily available data from public markets.
Why the other options are incorrect:
A. Because they have no interest in ESG considerations: This is incorrect. Many funds in these sectors are increasingly interested in ESG integration due to investor demand and the recognition that ESG factors impact long-term value. The challenge lies in the availability of data, not a lack of interest.

C. Because they prioritize active investment over passive investment: This is incorrect. These funds are typically active investors, but this does not explain the delay in ESG integration. The main barrier is the difficulty in obtaining consistent and reliable ESG data for their portfolio assets.

25
Quiz #3 NO.5 Which of the following is one of the EU Taxonomy conditions for an economic activity to be considered environmentally sustainable? A. Complying with the highest social and governance standards B. “Doing no significant harm” to any of the environmental objectives C. Contributing substantially to at least three environmental objectives
B. “Doing no significant harm” to any of the environmental objectives Explanation: Under the EU Taxonomy Regulation, for an economic activity to be considered environmentally sustainable, it must meet specific conditions, one of which is the "Do No Significant Harm" (DNSH) principle. This means the activity must not cause significant harm to any of the six environmental objectives outlined in the taxonomy, even if it contributes substantially to one of them. Why B. “Doing no significant harm” to any of the environmental objectives is correct: This is a core requirement of the EU Taxonomy to ensure that while contributing to one environmental objective, the activity does not negatively impact others. The six environmental objectives under the EU Taxonomy are: Climate change mitigation Climate change adaptation Sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources Transition to a circular economy Pollution prevention and control Protection and restoration of biodiversity and ecosystems For example, a renewable energy project contributing to climate change mitigation must not harm biodiversity or water resources.
26
Quiz #3 NO.6 What is the aim of investor protection regulations that consider sustainability? 考慮到可持續性的投資者保護法規的目的是什麼? A. To protect investors by improving transparency and efficiency in markets B. To restrict the information available to investors regarding the sustainability practices of investee companies C. To prevent investors from incorporating sustainability preferences into their investment decisions
A. To protect investors by improving transparency and efficiency in markets Explanation: Investor protection regulations that consider sustainability aim to ensure that investors have access to clear, transparent, and reliable information regarding the sustainability aspects of their investments. These regulations help improve market efficiency by reducing information asymmetries and enabling investors to make informed decisions that align with their financial goals and sustainability preferences. Why A. To protect investors by improving transparency and efficiency in markets is correct: Transparency: Regulations often require companies and financial products to disclose their ESG practices and sustainability-related risks, ensuring that investors are well-informed. Efficiency: By standardizing sustainability-related disclosures, these regulations make it easier for investors to compare investment options, reducing inefficiencies caused by inconsistent or incomplete data. Alignment with preferences: Investor protection regulations, such as the EU Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR), ensure that investors can incorporate their sustainability preferences into decision-making without being misled by "greenwashing."
27
Quiz #3 NO.7 Which of the following is not a key area of focus in the TCFD recommendations? A. Governance B. Risk management C. Credit ratings
C. Credit ratings Explanation: The Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) provides recommendations to help organizations disclose climate-related risks and opportunities in a consistent and comparable way. These recommendations are structured around four key areas: Governance: The organization's governance around climate-related risks and opportunities. Strategy: The actual and potential impacts of climate-related risks and opportunities on the organization’s business, strategy, and financial planning. Risk Management: How the organization identifies, assesses, and manages climate-related risks. Metrics and Targets: The metrics and targets used to assess and manage relevant climate-related risks and opportunities. Credit ratings are not a key area of focus in the TCFD recommendations. While credit ratings may be influenced by climate-related risks and disclosures, they are not directly addressed in the TCFD framework. Why the other options are correct: A. Governance: TCFD emphasizes the role of governance in overseeing climate-related risks and opportunities. B. Risk management: TCFD focuses on how organizations identify and manage climate-related risks as part of their overall risk management framework.
28
Quiz #3 NO.8 The “comply or explain” approach to ESG investment policies: A. requires mandatory disclosures. B. allows challenges to the assertion that ESG integration is required. C. is considered a more stringent requirement than “comply and explain.”
B. allows challenges to the assertion that ESG integration is required. Explanation: The "comply or explain" approach to ESG investment policies is a regulatory framework requiring entities to either comply with specific ESG-related guidelines or explain why they have not done so. This approach provides flexibility while encouraging transparency and accountability. It allows stakeholders to question whether ESG integration is necessary or appropriate in specific cases, as organizations can justify deviations instead of strictly adhering to the rules. Why B. allows challenges to the assertion that ESG integration is required is correct: The "comply or explain" approach permits organizations to deviate from ESG requirements if they provide a reasonable and transparent explanation. This framework fosters a dialogue between stakeholders and entities about whether ESG integration is applicable, necessary, or effective in certain situations. It avoids mandatory enforcement while ensuring that deviations are openly disclosed and justified.
29
Quiz #3 NO.9 How has the adoption of ESG investing by retail investors compared to institutional investors? A. It has been slower. B. It has been faster. C. It has been at the same pace.
A. It has been slower. Explanation: The adoption of ESG investing by retail investors has generally been slower compared to institutional investors. This is due to several factors, including lower awareness, less access to ESG-focused investment products, and fewer resources to evaluate ESG-related data. Institutional investors, such as pension funds, asset managers, and insurance companies, have been at the forefront of ESG adoption because of growing regulatory pressures, fiduciary duties, and the need to manage long-term risks. Why A. It has been slower is correct: Institutional leadership: Institutional investors have driven the early adoption of ESG practices due to their influence and resources to analyze and integrate ESG factors. Retail challenges: Retail investors often face barriers such as limited knowledge of ESG investing, lack of accessible and affordable ESG products, and insufficient education on the financial benefits of sustainable investing. Recent growth: While retail adoption of ESG investing has been increasing in recent years, particularly with the rise of ESG-focused ETFs and mutual funds, it still lags behind the institutional sector.