MODULE 5 Flashcards

1
Q

People v. Rubiso

A

nabaril, nakaupo, gun ≠ unlawful aggression

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

People v. Enfectana

A

Binangga ng tricycle, jeepney, stabbing, depang

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

People v. Genosa

A

battered wife syndrome as self-defense,

Doctrine:
Must prove at least two cycles
Cycles of violence
1. tension building phase
2. acute battering incident
3. tranquil loving period

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

People v. Narvaez

A

Fence, house and rice mill, shot, defense of person and property, incomplete self-defense

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

People v. Boholst-Caballero

A

caroling = prostituting, choke, knife by the belt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

People v. Alconga

A

blackjack, first was self-sefense but second was not

Doctrine:
Right to kill ends when aggression stops

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

People v. Sumicad

A

lumber, no sweldo, kept running, bolo, self-defense

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

People v. Luague

A

mag-asawa, rape, kitchen knife, defending her honor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

People v. Dela Cruz

A

hipo, pocket knife, defense of honor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

People v. Jaurigue

A

creepy manliligaw, church, stabbed in the neck

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

US v. Bumanglang

A

missing palay, trap, sticks, sheathed bolo, homicide

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Velasquez v. People

A

sex in victim’s house, ambush, serious physical injuries

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Aguilar v. DOJ

A

Tetet, “NPA,” stole a grenade

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Ortega v. Sandiganbayan

A

traffic duty, extortionist, stabbed, insufficient evidence (no knife)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Flores v. People

A

inuman, M-16 armalite, 4 gunshot wounds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Nacnac v. People

A

two policemen, drunk victim, warning shot, shot on the head

17
Q

People v. Gamez

A

Father and son, tumultuous relationship, bolo, disarmed

Doctrine:
Unlawful aggression must be continuous and threat existing when wrongful act is done.

18
Q

People v. Ricohermoso

A

kaingin, no palay, embrace from behind, avoid greater injury

19
Q

Ty v. People

A

mother and sister confined, bouncing checks, mother suicide

Doctrine:
1. Existence of uncontrollable fear/evil
2. Real and imminent fear; No other practical or less harmful means to prevent
3. Fear of injury is greater than or at least equal to that committed

20
Q

People v. Ulep

A

berserk, police shot him twice

21
Q

Cabanlig v. Sandiganbayan

A

detained prisoner, agaw baril, attempted escape, shot no warning

Doctrine:

Use of force by a policeman in the performance of duty is justified to:
1. secure and detain offender
2. overcome his resistance
3. prevent escape
4. recapture if he escapes
5. protect himself from bodily harm.

22
Q

People v. Delima

A

fugitive, bamboo weapon, fired twice

23
Q

People v. Oanis

A

tulog binaril

Doctrine:

  1. offender acted in the performance of a duty or in the lawful exercise of a right; and
  2. injury or offense committed be the necessary consequence of the due performance of such duty or the lawful exercise of such right or office.
24
Q

Yapyuco v. Sandiganbayan

A

jeepney full of “NPA,” open fired at the curve

25
Q

Angcaco v. People

A

Kapitan, person w/ a bolo near other police, shot, nephew

26
Q

People v. Beronilla

A

Abra military mayor, 12 bolomen, TEAAE, extrajudicial death penalty

27
Q

Tabuena v. Sandiganbayan

A

verbal + presidential memo, MIAA to PNCC but went to president