Monk - Social Psychology Test Revision 21/09/18 Flashcards

1
Q

CONFORMITY - is ‘a change in behaviour or belief ……

A

as a result of real or imagined group pressure’ (David Myers, 1999)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

COMPLIANCE - publicly conforming to the behaviour or views of….

A

others but privately maintaining one’s own views. Could result from Normative Social Influence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

INTERNALISATION - A conversion, or true change of private views to match….

A

those of the group. Could be the result of Informational Social Influence. NOT DEPENDANT ON THE PRESENCE OF THE GROUP.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

IDENTIFICATION - Adopting the views or behaviour of the group…..

A

publicly and privately because one values membership of that group. DEPENDS ON THE PRESENCE OF THE GROUP

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

NORMATIVE SOCIAL INFLUENCE - The …..

A

desire to be liked

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

INFORMATIONAL SOCIAL INFLUENCE - The ….

A

desire to be right

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

ANTI-CONFORMITY - Individuals who …….

A

consistently oppose the norms of the group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

INDEPENDENCE - Unresponsive……

A

to the norms of the group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

DISPOSITIONAL EXPLANATION OF BEHAVIOUR - (who we are) presumes people will act according to……

A

their individual personalities regardless of the situation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

SITUATIONAL EXPLANATION OF BEHAVIOUR - (the situation we are in) presumes people will act in a way they….

A

think is required by their social role - what is normal/expected in different situations (i.e. will they conform to the role they have been assigned)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

OBEDIENCE - A form of social influence where an individual follows…..

A

a direct order from an authoritative figure. This authoritative figure has the power to punish when individuals are not being obedient

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Research support for NSI?

A

The people who said the incorrect answer were afraid of disapproval which caused the people to conform instead of saying what they thought was correct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Individual differences for NSI?

A

People respond differently in certain situations. This means people choose to conform due to NSI and some choose not to conform

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Research support for ISI?

A

People tend to conform when they don’t know the answer to a question. This means they copy others who they think is right in order to say the correct answer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Individual differences for ISI?

A

People respond differently in different situations. This means that some people may choose to stick to what they think is right and others may copy those around them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Asch’s Line Study Aim and participants?

A

To see if people would conform to a majority when given an unambiguous situation

  • 123 male undergraduate participants
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Asch’s Line Study Procedure?

A
  • 8-10 participants sat round a table
  • Each participant shown 18 sets of lines in total, on 12 of these trials the confederates gave the same answer - known as critical trials
18
Q

Asch’s Line Study Results?

A
  • On the critical trials, 36.8% of responses were incorrect (participants conformed to the wrong response)
  • 25% never conformed, meaning 75% conformed at least once
19
Q

Asch’s Variation?

A
  • Unanimity
  • Task difficulty
  • Size of majority
20
Q

Unanimity?

A
  • Less conformity when some of the confederates didn’t conform- 25% on critical trials
21
Q

Supports for unanimity?

A

Supports NSI as an explanation for conformity and ISI as an explanation for conformity. This decreases conformity because you have someone who likes you because they agree with you and clarify your answer.

22
Q

Task difficulty?

A

More difficult or unclear task = more conformity (ISI)

23
Q

Supports for Task difficulty ?

A

Supports ISI as an explanation for conformity because you are likely to pick the answer everyone picks because you think it is right

24
Q

Size of Majority?

A

1 confederate = no conformity
2 confederates = 12.8% conformity on critical trials
3 confederates = 32% conformity because if there are more people there is more need to feel liked instead of right

25
Q

Positives for Asch’s Line Study?

A
  • Replicable ~ this increases the reliability because the results would be consistent
  • High internal validity- this took away an extraneous variables because the experiment took places in a lab
26
Q

Negatives for Asch’s Line Study ?

A
  • Only used men so the findings can not be applied to women - Generalisability ( Neto did the study and found different results)
  • Only used undergraduate students - Generalisability
  • Not applicable to the real world- low external validity
29
Q

Zimbardo’s Study Aim?

A

To see if dispositional factors or situational factors affect conformity to social roles

30
Q

Zimbardo’s Study Participants?

A
  • Male students (paid $15 per day)
  • 24 most stable participants (tests to see who was the most mentally and physically fit)
  • 2 reserves, 1 dropped out, 10 prisoners, 1 guards
31
Q

Zimbardo’s Study Procedure ?

A
  • Prisoners were arrested at home. Put through delousing (booking) procedure, searched, given uniforms. Guards had uniforms. Prisoners were allowed to certain rights (supervised toilet trips, 2hrs reading or letter writing.
32
Q

Zimbardo’s Study Results?

A

Guards grew increasingly tyrannical, prisoners depressed. 5 prisoners had to be released early with extreme depression.
- experiment was supposed to be 2 weeks but ended after 6 days.

33
Q

Zimbardo’s Study Conclusion?

A

Guards and prisoners conformed to the social roles they were assigned, supporting the situational explanation of behaviour.

34
Q

Milgram’s Study Aim ?

A

To see if participant will obey people in authority

35
Q

Milgram’s Study Participants?

A

40 men between 20 and 40

36
Q

Milgram’s Study Procedure?

A

Participants were introduced to the confederate. The experimenter drew names to see who was the participant and teacher (rigged). The participants had to shock (15V to 450V) the confederate each time they got an answer wrong. The participants were given 3 prompts before they could stop or had reached 450V then could stop.

37
Q

Milgram’s Study Results?

A
  • 65% went to the maximum voltage of 450V
38
Q

Positives for Milgram’s Study?

A
  • his findings have been replicated in other cultures and they generally found the same results (Miranda found 90% obedience)
  • he has good control variables ~ he could change one variable but keep everything the same this improves accuracy - Validity
39
Q

Negatives for Milgram’s Study?

A
  • deception- told participants shocks weren’t dangerous
  • right to withdraw- participants were given three prompts before being able to leave
  • protection of participants- one participant had a seizure because he was so uncomfortable with carrying on
40
Q

Milgram’s Study Variations?

A
  • Location
  • Proximity
  • Uniform
41
Q

Location ?

A

Less obedience when the venue is not prestigious

42
Q

Proximity?

A

The closer the experimenter the more obedience the further away the experimenter the less obedience

43
Q

Positives for Zimbardo’s Study?

A
  • Realistic ~ nobody was acting. They were just given social roles and put into prison.
  • There were some control variables over the experiment (most stable participants)
44
Q

Negatives for Zimbardo’s Study ?

A
  • Didn’t reflect real life ~ prisons normally have set rules in order to keep prisoners safe
  • Zimbardo didn’t protect his participants which affected them causing them to be mentally traumatised