Monopoly Flashcards
(12 cards)
define monopoly market
a market where a single company or person is the sole supplier of a product or service as they provide the lowest unit cost/ LRAC than any other firm could
- means that consumers have no choice but to buy from that company
characteristics of monopoly
- one seller dominates market= price maker
- high barriers to entry and exit
- differentiated goods
- imperfect info of market conditions
- firm is profit maximisers
analysis of diagram
- allocative efficiency @ D=MC
= charges price above MC
= exploit consumers w high prices and Q is limited
= decrease choice in market - maximise profits by setting output where MR = MC
= @ output Qm and Price Pm
= monopolist increases price and reduces output - dynamic efficiency as LR supernormal profits made= restricts competition entering market due to barriers
adv monopoly
- monopolies usually large firms= exploit EoS
- dynamic efficiency= supernormal profits re-invested back into firm= more innovation to create new products for consumers= more choice
= higher productivity leads to lower prices in LR - exploit EoS due to large size= decrease price and increase quantity
disadv monopoly
- x inefficient= increase waste in production process= less competition can be less productivity of workers etc= allow excess costs to creep in= lead to higher prices in LR
- lead to inequalities in necessity goods like food and water= high prices mean the poor suffer most= lead to income inequalities= lower SOL
- consumers exploited to high prices above MC
evaluation
- may not always use extra profit into dynamic efficiency = cld give to shareholders, save, pay back debts etc
- depends on objective of firm= assume profit max but not always the case= cld be sales max etc
- depends on threat of potential competition
- depend on type of good or service= bad for necessity goods but not deep for electronics etc
- depends on current regulations
- depends on type of monopoly
describe natural monopoly
where one large business can supply the entire market @ a lower LRAC contrasted with multiple providers
= because of the nature of costs in a natural monopoly are very high fixed costs and low marginal costs
= internal EoS available to the largest firms mean that there is a tendency for one business to dominate the market in the LR
- different shape of the LRAC curve is due to the nature of the industry and the barriers to entry that exist
- only room for one firm in industry to reach MES
- tend to be state owned and heavily regulated to ensure fair pricing
- LRAC continues to fall over a large range of output
examples of natural monopolies
- water, gas and electricity distribution
adv natural monopoly
- high fixed start up costs= railways expensive to build tracks, trains etc and water distribution pipe work= increase barriers to entry as only 1 can be most efficient
= increase potential for Eos= spread high fixed costs across huge volume of output= huge quantity minimises AC (AC=TC/Q)
= literally no risk for diseconomies of scale due to huge Q produced - makes rational sense for only one firm to supply entire market
= competition would result in wasteful duplication of resources
= first firm that enters market gets EoS adv= if any other firm enters later, they won’t have same EoS adv= will eventually be priced out of market
= as they leave the market, all of their infrastructure and resources will be wasted and left idle
= x, allocative and productively inefficient - competition would result in non exploitation of full EoS
= won’t reach MES of EoS= firms won’t all be of greatest possible size
EVAL of natural monopoly
- depends on regulations= if forced to produce @ allocative effeminacy due to high price and low quantity, firms will have higher LRAC than LRMC
= create subnormal profit= loss per unit - depends on subsidies given by regulator= loss may be covered by subsidies
= subsidy would be equal to loss per unit
examples of monopoly
- insulin has marginal cost of $3.36-$6 in 2018, market price of insulin in US is $340-$580
= demand for insulin is price inelastic due to lack of substitutes doe diabetics - the produce @ MC=MR (profit max)= large supernormal profits
- price is above MC of supply= allocatively inefficient= creates dwl
causes of monopoly exploitive prices of insulin
- lack of regulations= market determines drugs prices, not gov
- complex supply chain to bringing insulin into market
= involves multiple stakeholders like manufacturers, pharmacies, scientists etc who all add profit mark up to the price of insulin - high fixed cost of research and development, clinical trials etc
= all contribute to high AC= cause price to rise