MPD Policy (Use of Force) Flashcards
(37 cards)
Use of Force
____ - Force reasonably anticipated and intended to create a substantial likelihood of causing death or very serious injury.
Deadly force
Use of Force
____ - The application of physical or compliance techniques or tactics, any form of restraint including, striking with hand, foot or any other object, the discharge of a firearm (except when used for firearms training, practice, qualification, ballistics examinations, or a sporting event), the use of any impact weapon, chemical agent, oleoresin capsicum, conducted electronic weapon, the use of a canine, or any other weapons to another person. It is not a use of force when a person allows him/herself to be searched, escorted, handcuffed or restrained.
Force
Use of Force
____ - Ready to take place; impending. Note that imminent does not mean immediate or instantaneous.
Imminent
Use of Force
____ - Physical force that exceeds the degree permitted by law or the policies and guidelines of the Moore Police Department. The use of excessive force shall be presumed when a Moore Police Officer continues to apply physical force to a person who has been rendered incapable of resisting arrest.
Excessive Force
Use of Force
The use of force by law enforcement personnel is a matter of __1__, both to __2__ and to the __3__. Officers are involved on a daily basis in numerous and varied interactions and, when warranted, may use __4__ force in carrying out their duties.
- critical concern
- the public
- law enforcement community
- reasonable
Use of Force
Officers must have an understanding of, and true appreciation for, their __1__ and __2__. This is especially true with respect to overcoming __3__ while engaged in the performance of __4__.
- authority
- limitations
- resistance
- law enforcement duties
Use of Force
The Moore Police Department recognizes and respects the value of all __1__ and __2__ to anyone. Vesting officers with the authority to use __3__ and to protect the public welfare requires __4__, __5__ and a careful __6__ of all interests.
- all human life
- dignity without prejudice
- reasonable force
- monitoring
- evaluation
- careful balancing
Use of Force
Any officer present and observing another officer using force that is clearly beyond that which is __1__ under the circumstances shall, when in a position to do so, __2__ to prevent the use of unreasonable force.
- objectively reasonable
2. intercede
Use of Force
An officer who observes another employee use force that __1__ the degree of force permitted by __2__ shall promptly report these observations to a __3__.
- exceeds
- law
- supervisor
Use of Force
Any officer who has completed his/her __1__ and who witnesses another peace officer use physical force that __2__ the degree permitted by law or this policy shall make a __3__ of such use to his/her __4__ as soon as practicable (22 O.S. § 34.2).
- probationary period
- exceeds
- written report
- immediate supervisor
Use of Force (Duty to Report Excessive Force)
At a minimum, the written report shall include: 1-3
An officer may use a copy of an __4__ or similar report provided it contains the mandatory __5__ information.
- The date, time and place of the occurrence.
2. The identity, if known, and description of the participants.
3. A description of the events and the force used. - arrest report
- minimum
Use of Force
Officers shall use only that amount of force that __1__ appears __2__ given the facts and circumstances perceived by the officer at the __3__ to accomplish a __4__ law enforcement purpose.
- reasonably
- necessary
- time of the event
- legitimate
Use of Force
The __1__ of force will be judged from the __2__ of a reasonable officer on the scene at the __3__ of the incident.
- reasonableness
- perspective
- time
Use of Force
Any evaluation of __1__ must allow for the fact that officers are often forced to make __2__ decisions about the amount of force that __3__ appears necessary in a particular situation, with limited information and in circumstances that are __4__, __5__ and __6__ evolving.
- reasonableness
- split-second
- reasonably
- tense
- uncertain
- rapidly
Use of Force
Given that no policy can realistically predict every possible situation an officer might encounter, officers are entrusted to use __1__ discretion in determining the __2__ use of force in each incident.
- well-reasoned
2. appropriate
Use of Force
It is also recognized that circumstances may arise in which officers __1__ believe that it would be __2__ or __3__ to use any of the tools, weapons or methods provided by this department.
- reasonably
- impractical
- ineffective
Use of Force
Officers may find it more __1__ or __2__ to improvise their response to rapidly unfolding conditions that they are confronting. In such circumstances, the use of any __3__ device or method must __4__ be reasonable and utilized only to the degree that reasonably appears necessary to accomplish a legitimate law enforcement purpose.
- effective
- reasonable
- improvised
- nonetheless
Use of Force
Use of Force
While the ultimate objective of every law enforcement encounter is to avoid or __1__ injury, nothing in this policy requires an officer __2__ or be __3__ to possible physical injury before applying reasonable force.
- minimize
- retreat
- exposed
Use of Force
An officer may use __1__ force when a person being __2__ arrested resists arrest or attempts to escape (21 O.S. § 643).
- reasonable
2. lawfully
Use of Force
When determining whether to apply force and evaluating whether an officer has used reasonable force, a number of factors should be taken into consideration, as time and circumstances permit. These factors include, but are not limited to: 1-16
- Immediacy and severity of the threat to officers or others.
- The conduct of the individual being confronted, as reasonably perceived by the officer at the time.
- Officer/subject factors (e.g., age, size, relative strength, skill level, injuries sustained, level of exhaustion or fatigue, the number of officers available vs. subjects).
- The effects of drugs or alcohol.
- Individual’s mental state or capacity.
- Proximity of weapons or dangerous improvised devices.
- The degree to which the individual has been effectively restrained and his/her ability to resist despite being restrained.
- The availability of other options and their possible effectiveness.
- Seriousness of the suspected offense or reason for contact with the individual.
- Training and experience of the officer.
- Potential for injury to officers, suspects and others.
- Whether the individual appears to be resisting, attempting to evade arrest by flight or is attacking the officer.
- The risk and reasonably foreseeable consequences of escape.
- The apparent need for immediate control of the individual or a prompt resolution of the situation.
- Whether the conduct of the individual being confronted no longer reasonably appears to pose an imminent threat to the officer or others.
- Prior contacts with the individual or awareness of any propensity for violence.
Any other exigent circumstances.
Use of Force
Pain compliance techniques may be effective in controlling a physically or actively resisting individual. Officers may only apply those pain compliance techniques for which they have successfully completed department-approved training. Officers utilizing any pain compliance technique should consider: 1-3
- The degree to which the application of the technique may be controlled given the level of resistance.
- Whether the individual can comply with the direction or orders of the officer.
- Whether the individual has been given sufficient opportunity to comply.
Use of Force
The application of any __1__ technique shall be __2__ once the officer determines that compliance has been achieved.
- pain compliance
2. discontinued
Use of Force
The proper application of the carotid control hold may be effective in restraining a violent or combative individual. However, due to the potential for injury, the use of the carotid control hold is subject to the following: 1-7
- The officer shall have successfully completed department-approved training in the use and application of the carotid control hold. Officers will also receive updates and retrain in the carotid control hold periodically.
- The carotid control hold may only be used when circumstances perceived by the officer at the time indicate that such application reasonably appears necessary to control an individual in any of the following circumstances:
a. The individual is violent or physically resisting.
b. The individual, by words or actions, has demonstrated an intention to be violent and reasonably appears to have the potential to harm officers, him/herself or others. - The application of a carotid control hold on the following individuals should generally be avoided unless the totality of the circumstances indicates that other available options reasonably appear ineffective, or would present a greater danger to the officer, the individual or others, and the officer reasonably believes that the need to control the individual outweighs the risk of applying a carotid control hold:
a. Individuals who are known to be pregnant
b. Elderly individuals
c. Obvious juveniles
d. Individuals who appear to have Down syndrome or who appear to have obvious neck deformities or malformations, or visible neck injuries
e. Persons who have been sprayed by O.C. spray - Any individual who has had the carotid control hold applied, regardless of whether he/she was rendered unconscious, shall be promptly examined by medical personnel and should be monitored until examined by medical personnel.
- The officer shall inform any person receiving custody, or any person placed in a position of providing care, that the individual has been subjected to the carotid control hold and whether the individual lost consciousness as a result.
- Any officer attempting or applying the carotid control hold shall promptly notify a supervisor of the use or attempted use of such hold.
- The use or attempted use of the carotid control hold shall be thoroughly documented by the officer in any related reports.
Use of Force
In general, officers may use __1__ force to lawfully seize __2__ and to prevent the destruction of __3__. However, officers are __4__ from using __5__ solely to prevent a person from swallowing evidence or contraband. In the instance when force is used, officers should not intentionally use any technique that __6__, __7__ or which creates a reasonable likelihood that __8__ to the head or __9__ would be restricted.
- reasonable
- evidence
- evidence
- discouraged
- force
- restricts blood flow to the head
- restricts respiration
- blood flow
- respiration