Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM


Top Flashcards (Certified)
All Flashcards

Patents, Patents, Patents > MPEP 2100 > Flashcards

MPEP 2100 Flashcards

1
Q

Non-Patentable Subject Matter

A
  • Laws of nature
  • Physical Phenomena
  • Abstract Ideas
  • Human Organisms (AIA 33)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Patentable Subject matter

A
  • Product
  • Process
  • Product-by-Process
  • Living Subject Matter (human ingenuity)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

AIA Tax Strategies

A

AiA 14 limits what can be used to differentiate claimed invention from prior art under 102 or 103

Strategy for reducing, avoiding, or deferring tax liability is insufficient to differentiate a claimed invention from the prior art.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Claim Interpretation: General

A

Broadest Reasonable Interpretation

  • Consistent with the specification
  • Consistent with what those skilled in the art would determine
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Claim Interpretation: Effects of Preamble

A

The preamble does not always limit a claim.

Case-by-case basis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Claim Interpretation: Translational Phrases

A

Non-Exclusive:

  • Comprising
  • Including
  • Characterized by

Exclusive:

  • Consisting of
  • Consisting essentially of
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Inherency Rejections

A

Inherent features can be relied upon in as 102 Anticipation or a 103 Obviousness rejection whether they are implicit, express, or inherent in a prior art disclosure

Old inventions do not become patentable simply because of a newly discovered inherent feature.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Product-by-Process Claims

A

Product must be similar to prior art to be unpatentable and not the process used to achieve the product.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Apparatus and Article Claims

A

Cover the device itself and not what the device does

The structure of the apparatus must be different from the prior art to be patentable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Prior Art: Enablement

A

Prior art is assumed to be Operable/Enabling.

Burden is on applicant to prove prior art is inoperable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Prior Art: Compounds and Compositions

A

Enabling prior art must allow one skilled in the art to make/synthesize the invention from the disclosure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Prior Art: Plant Genetics

A

A person skilled in the art must be able to grow and cultivate the plant based on the prior art

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Prior Art: Apparatus and Articles

A

A picture may be prior art if it shows all of the claim structural features, including how they are put together

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Prior Art: Patents

A

Everything that is disclosed in a patent is considered prior art, even what is not claimed, alternate embodiments, and non-preferred embodiments.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Prior Art: “Secret” Patents

A

Can be used as prior art as of the date they are made available to the public.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Prior Art: 102(d)

A

The grant date is used for a 102(d) rejection.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Prior Art: Foreign Patents

A

Available as prior art when they are granted their patent rights, not the application filing date

18
Q

Prior Art: Abandoned Applications and Provisional Applications

A

Prior art as of the day they become available to the public.

Examples:

  • When voluntarily disclosed
  • When in publication
  • When referenced in another patent
19
Q

Prior Art: Drawings

A

Give rise to a 102 Anticipation rejection.

Can be used as prior art if they show all the claimed structural features and how they are put together.

Proportions in a drawing are not evidence of actual proportions when drawings are not to scale, and measurements of a drawing cannot be used against an invention if there is no scale provided.

20
Q

Prior Art: “Printed Publication”

A

A reference is a “printed publication” if it is accessible to the public.

Accessibility to persons skilled in the art is key.

  • Web pages and online content
  • Thesis placed in university library, indexed and shelved
  • Orally presented papers if written copies are available without restriction
  • Publicly displayed documents if only displayed for a few days
21
Q

Factors for Public Accessibility

A
  • Length of time displayed
  • Target audience expertise
  • Expectation that the material would not be copied
  • Ease at which the material could have been copied
22
Q

Prior Art: Admissions

A

Admissions on the record as a reference of prior art can be relied upon for a 102 or 103 rejection, even if the reference would not have been considered prior art otherwise.

23
Q

Prior Art: IDS

A

A reference on an IDS is not admitted prior art.

24
Q

Exception to the Rule that the Critical Reference Date Must Precede the Filing Date

A

If a reference shows a universal fact, the date of the reference does not need to be prior to the effective date to be used as prior art.

Examples:

  • Scientific principles
  • Material properties
  • Material characteristics
25
Jepson Claims
Used when the case of an improvement. - Preamble comprising a general description of all the elements or steps of the claimed combination which are conventional or known - Phrase such as "wherein the improvement comprises" - Those elements, steps, and/or relationships which constitute that portion of the claimed combination which the applicant considers as the new or improved portion.
26
Prior Art: Jepson Preamble
Implied admission of prior art and can be used to avoid a double patenting rejection. If the preamble is the work of the applicant, it can't be used against him.
27
Anticipation under 102(a), (b), and (e): General Rule
Generally, to anticipate a claim, only one reference may be used, and it must teach every element of the claim.
28
Anticipation under 102(a), (b), and (e): Exceptions
An anticipatory rejection using multiple references can be okay if the additional references are used to: - Prove the primary reference contains an "enabled disclosure" - Explain the meaning of a term used in the primary reference - Show that a characteristic not disclosed in the reference is inherent
29
Anticipation under 102(a), (b), and (e): Genus-Species
A species can anticipate a genus. The reference need only disclose one species if multiple are listed to anticipate the claim.
30
Anticipation under 102(a), (b), and (e): Range Anticipation
Single Point: For a range to be anticipated by a reference, only a single point within the claimed range need to be disclosed in the reference. Overlapping Reference: Usually considered anticipation if the claimed ranges overlap (not always the case) Nearly the Same Range: There is no anticipation if the range is "nearly the same"
31
Not Used in Anticipation Rejections
- Secondary Considerations - Nonanalogous Art - Disparaging Art - Not recognized as solving the problem - Teaching away
32
Obviousness: Prima Facie
Examiner must explicitly support his case in the analysis Examples: - TSM in the prior art - Obvious to Try - Substitution of one known element for another to obtain a predictable result - Applying a known technique to a device known to be ready for an improvement to yield predictably - Use of a known technique to improve similar devices in the same way - Combining prior art elements according to known methods to yield predictable results
33
Obviousness: Rationale
A 103 Rejection must be supported by - Legal precedent - Scientific Principles - Logic - Reasoning from common knowledge in the art - A reference or art-recognized equivalents
34
Obviousness: Graham Factors
1) Determine the scope and content of the prior art 2) Ascertain the differences between the prior art and the claims in issue 3) Determine the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art 4) Evaluate any evidence of secondary consideration
35
Obviousness: Applicant's Rebuttal
Applicant can submit evidence to rebut examiner's prima facie obviousness. Example: Secondary considerations such as - Commercial Success - Long Felt but unresolved need - Failure of others
36
35 USC 112(a) Rejection
Generally a question of whether the subject-matter of a claim is supported by or conforms to the disclosure of an application as filed. Typical Circumstances: - Amendment made affecting a claim - Addition of a new claim
37
New Matter
Added to disclosure: Examiner should - Object to the introduction of under 35 USC 132 or 251 - Require applicant to cancel the new matter Added to claims: Examiner should - Reject the claims under 35 USC 112(a)
38
Enablement Rejection
The examiner has the initial burden to establish a reasonable basis to question the enablement provided for the claimed invention.
39
35 USC 112(b): Numerical Ranges and Amounts Limitations
"Effective Amount" - may or may not be identifiable - Proper test is whether or not one skilled in the art could determine specific values for the amount based on the disclosure
40
Equivalence
Arises when an element in prior art is equivalent to the corresponding element disclosed in the specification. The examiner can find a prior art element which performs the function specified in the claim The examiner should assume the prior art element is an equivalent.
41
Doctrine of Equivalents
Arises in the context of an infringement action. Where a product or process does not specifically infringe a protected invention, then item may still be found to infringe through the Doctrine of Equivalents

Patents, Patents, Patents (5 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2025 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions