MPEP Chapter 600: Parts, Form, and Content of Application Flashcards
(37 cards)
Requirements for Oath/Dec
- Inventor believes they are an inventor
- App is being filed with their permission
- They have reviewed and understand the contents of the application
- Duty to disclose
Oaths and Declarations
Cannot be amended
Don’t need one for filing date
Oath - sworn before notary
Dec - statement with warning
Need not be in English
Don’t need date
Supplemental Oath/Dec
Replaces defective oath/dec
Submitted when claims are amended to claim subject matter not hitherto claimed
NO FEE
Rule 1.53(b) and (d)
Copy of executed oath for parent can be filed
Post-AIA Alteration of Patent Application Before Filing
Executed oath/dec can still be used if the application is adjusted post-execution, if it still covers the revised application
Substitute Statement
Can be used to lieu of oath/dec if inventor is dead, incapacitated, etc.
Inventors must be identified in
Sub stat/oath/dec and ADS
Application Data Sheet
Submitted in a prov, non-prov, or national-stage application
Must be submitted to claim priority
Can be corrected until payment of issue fee
Inventorship
In US, begins with inventors
Claim-by-claim basis
Contribute to CONCEPTION
Correcting Inventoship
Has to be “in error”
Rule 1.48
Rule 1.48
- Non-Prov
Signed ADS and fee - Prov
Request and fee - Special Circumstances
Reissue
Issued patent
PTAB case - Continuing Apps
Copy of oath/dec
Inventorship = that in parent
Notice of Omitted Items
When an app is filed without a specification page or figure
Choice 1 - Notice of Omitted Items
File a petition + fee with omitted items and request later filing date be awarded
Choice 2 - Notice of Omitted Items
Let PTO know you are doing nothing, original filing date remains, make preliminary amendment and hope it is not “new matter”
Types of Incomplete Applications
- Notice of Missing Parts - Missing FOT, filing date not in play
- Notice of Incomplete Application - drawings aren’t good, missing abstract, filing date not in play
- Notice of Omitted Items - parts of spec/drawings missing, filing date in play, BAD
Claims
Assertion of the things to prevent others from using, making, selling, imparting, offering for sale
Right to exclude
Apparatus claim = combo of elements interconnected
Method claim = combo of steps
Anticipated/Infringement
Anticipated - in Office Action, must have every element
Infringement - later on, must have every element
Comprising
Defines minimum
Constisting
Defines exact combination
Means Clauses (112(f))
Means plus function, covers elements in specification and equivalents
Markush Groups (MPEP 2173.05(h))
Used to define a claim limitation where there is no generic term to describe a group of things
- “chosen from a group consisting of A, B, and C”
- “said material is A, B, or C”
Jepson Claims
Preamble defining what is old (admitted prior art), transition phrase, body defining what is new
Multiple Dependent Claims
Depend from more than 1 claim
1. A mult dep cannot depend from another mult dep
2. Can be alternative only (“or”)
3. Each proper mult dep counts as number of claims from which it depends (improper = counts as 1)
Incorporation by Reference - Essential Material
Application may incorporate essential material by reference to issued US patent and published application
Essential = necessary for statutory requirements