MPRE Flashcards
(179 cards)
Purpose of ethical rules
min lvl of ethical behavior for trustworthy lawyers
sources of ethical rules
1) ABA Model Rules; 2) rules of evidence; 3) con law; 4) crim law
forms of discipline (2)
&
other sanctions (3)
D: 1) censure (scolded either publivly or privately by either disciplinary authority or SC); 2) disbarment (temporary or long term)
OS: 1) disqualified for client; 2) civil liability; 3) crim liability
mandatory v. aspirational rules
M: must
A: should
informed consent elements (3)
1) adequate disclosure; 2) consent; 3) confirmed in writing
knowing v. belief v. reasonable
K: actual subjective
B: actual subjective
R: objective based on reasonably prudent and competent lawyer std
who regulates legal profession
& with what
State SC & Fed DC
what: model rules as adapted by state
pre-admission reg (4)
1) accredited school; 2) character and fitness - looking at past crimes - specifically truth related, addiction, or debt; 3) truthfulness on apps to school and bar; 4) pass MPRE
post-admission reg (3)
1) violations of rules; 2) criminal acts involving honesty/fitness ot practice (crime type);
3) fraud/deceit (even non criminal if….a) fraud on ct OR b) common law fraud (statement + know false + intend deceive …. no harm req)
VL of attorneys: supervising (who and when?)
must make reasonable efforts to ensure that lawyers and non comply with rules - includes indie K-ers, IT, etc.
subject to VL for rule violation if supervisor a) orders; b) ratifies; or c) learns and fails remedial
defense for supervisor ordered ethical violatoin
only if reasonable order
compliance systems
partners have duty to have one in place regardless of past problems
snitch rule (3)
rq’d to report (lawyers or judges) if….
1) actual knowledge
2) substantial violation
3) goes to honesty/trustworthiness/fitness to practice
out of state conduct … home jur disciplinary authority?
yes, can still discipline in home jur
out of state conduct: conflict of laws
bound by jur where reasonably believe actions had predominant effect
out of state conduct: practicing while out of state admitted only
a) pro hac vice - related to specific dispute
b) associated w/ local counsel who actually participates
c) working for client from home jur + has home state qualification
result of unauthoirzed practice
non lawyers –> injunction
lawyers –> loss of fee
aiding and abetting unauthorized practice
aka failing to supervise non-professionals who are doing legal work
avoid by 1) having client contact; 2) supervise and take responsibility of their work, don’t just delegate
pro se litigants and ghost advice
lawyers allowed to give limited aid to pro se
entities cannot be pro se
splitting fees: who allowed (2)
1) only with lawyers (and estate of decedent lawyer, part of retirement plan)
2) who do legal work on the matter (without any non-lawyers or third-party payors controlling such)
sale of practice: when allowed
whole practice or some practice area
cannot increase fees associated with sale
sale of practice: reqs (3)
1) lawyer stops practice
2) give client notice
3) sold to another lawyer
sale of practice: return to practice (4 situations)
1) in-house counsel
2) pro bono
3) diff area of law
4) change in circ (family issues, financial issues)
sale of practice: non-competition covenants
not allowed except for sale of practice