MT2 Flashcards

(61 cards)

1
Q

Reflected Self-appraisal

Define

A

Belief about what other think of us
Low accuracy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Situationism

Core belief

A

Social self changes depending on context

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

social acceptance

Sociometer Hypothesis

A

self-esteem is an internal, subjective index of the extent to which we are included/favoured by others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Cultural differences in self-esteem

A

Differences in the emphasis on promoting self-esteem vs improving the self

Independent cultures more likely to seek out social interactions to boost self-esteem
- self-enhancement (+ve view)
- more sensitive to failure

Interdependent cultures more likely to seek out opportunity for self improvement
- self-effacement (-ve view)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

3 motives of self-esteem

A

Self-enhancement
Self-affirmation
Self-verification

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Self-enhancement

define, tendency, correlation

A

Desire to maintain/protect/improve +ve views of oneself

Better-than average effect: rate yourself higher in valued or amibiguous traits
High self-enhancement = better coping mechanisms (incl to feedback)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Self-affirmation

A

Effort to maintain self-worth when faced with negative feedback
Affirm oneself in a domain unrelated to the threatened domain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Self-verification

why

A

People strive for stable, subjectively accurate beliefs about oneself
Provides sense of coherence, predictablility, and assessment of feedback

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Self-regulatory Resource Model

A

Self-control susceptible to ego depletion => less psychic energy available to ward off urges (counteract with positive emotions and incentives)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

self-discrepancy theory

Promotion vs Prevention focus

A

Promotion focus: bhvr directed toward attaining positive outcomes (based on ideal-self)
Prevention focus: bhvr directed toward avoiding negative outcomes (based on ought-self)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Self-discrepancy theory

Concept, types, discrepancies

A

Hold beliefs about the different versions of self
Who should you be vs who do you want to be

  1. Actual self: self-image
  2. Ideal self: hopes/wishes
  3. Ought self: duties/obligation

Ideal and ought selves become motivation and guide
Discrepencies between actual self and ideal self => dejection related emotion
Discrepencies between actual self and ought self => agitation related emotion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Self-regulation

2 dif levels of contruals

A

High-level contruals:
- focus on abstract, global, essential features
- emphasis on larger goals/values

Low-level Construals:
- focus on salient, incidental, concrete details
- emphasis on immediate gratification/reward

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Automatic self-control strategy

Implementation Intentions

A

If-then plan
Smaller process goals to achieve larger outcome goal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Self-presentation

A

Presenting the person we would like to be perceived as (impression management)
Face: the public image of ourself that we want other to believe
Online: ppl tend to present themselves accurately in personality/attributes, except physical => self-verification motive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

2 tendencies of impression management

A

Self-monitoring: tendency to adapt bhvr to fit current situation

Self-handicapping: tendency to engage in self-defeating bhvr as an excuse for not meeting excpectations (protect the self)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

2 Manifestations of High Self-esteem

A

Secure:
- ↑explicit and implicit self-esteem
- stable, resiliant to threat

Defensive:
- ↑explicit and ↓ implicit self-esteem
- fragile, vulnerable to threat
- related to narcissism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

List 4 primary ways to gain Self-Knowledge

A
  1. Introspection
  2. Self-observation of bhvr
  3. Social interaction
  4. Social comparison
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Self-knowledge

Introspection

A

Internal reflection of self
Not always aware of our reasons; typically need a trigger (i.e. video) to for reflection
Bhvr often unrelated to personal standards (∴ looking in the mirror etc reminds us of our morals)
Self-awareness theory: evaluate oneself based on comparison to individual standards

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

self-knowledge

Self-observation of bhvr

A

How do our actions reflect our self

Self-perception theory: use bhvr to infer feeling when our attitudes are uncertain/ambiguous => either reflects true feelings (intrinsic) or situation (extrinsic)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

self-knowledge

Social Interaction

3 ways

A

Different selves depending on social sitation

Self-monitoring: observe and adapt bhvr to situation
Looking-glass Theory: self-concept incorporates how others view us (reflected self-appraisal)
Michelangelo Phenomenon: feedback from other affects self concept
- +ve feedback: affirmation
- irrelevent feedback: fail to affirm
- -ve feedback: disaffirm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

self-knowledge

Social Comparison

strategy

A

Used when no objective standard to measure against
most informative when group is similar to us

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Attitude

DefinitionS and 3 components

A

An evaluation of a stimulus along a positive-negative dimension
Neuroscience POV: attitude activates areas of motor cortex that support specific action

3 components blend together to influence attitude:
1. Affect: emotional response
2. Cogntions: thots and beliefs
3. Bhvrs: BIS/BAS - actions + observable bhvr

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Measurement of Attitude

Self-report, implicit, physiological

A

Self-report
- Accessibilitiy of attitude: how readily it comes to mind
- response latency: time it takes to evaluate stimulus (↓ time = ↑ strength of belief)
- Centrality of attitude to belief system

Implicit attitude measure: indirect measure of attitude, not including self-reports
- tap into nonconscious attitudes
- use when reason to believe person won’t self-report accuratley

Physiological Indicators:
-HR
- perspiration
- brain activity (-ve stimuli generate ↑ brain activity)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Result of introspecting about reasons for our attitudes

A

When we focus on the obvious info, we can undermine the real reason
Can mislead about our actual attitude and cause divide

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Cognitive Consistency Theories | primary outlook
impact of bhvr on attitudes reflect the tendency to justify our bhvr and minimize inconsistencies
26
conditions for cog dissonance to occur | Aronson
- concrete situations with pre-existing attitudes - if inconsistency implicates our core sense of self - if bhvr was chosen freely - if bhvr wasn't sufficiently justified - if bhvr has -ve consequences - if the -ve consequences were foreseeable
27
# Cognitive dissonance theory Describe 3 ways to reduce dissonance
1. Dissonance Reduction: rationalization and distortion (value change) in favour of preference/choice 2. Effort Justification: justify effort, time, money that was put into an ultimately disappointing decision 3. Self-Affirmation: reflect on personally relevent values ("i would normally say something")
28
Attitude Chnage (3 forms)
**Induced Compliance** Counter-Attitudinal Advocacy: bhvr compelled against beliefs in order to elicit dissonance and change their original attitudes and beliefs - inducement must be barely sufficient otherwise bhvr can be attributed to external justification Extinguishing Undesired Bhvr: mild threat of punishment for attitude change - must be mild so that external justification isnt used **Fear** - moderate amount of fear motivate inc attention - too much fear will cause active resistance
29
# Cog. Consistency theories Self-perception theory | attitude inference
Infer our attitudes based on bhvr & context in which it occured. Embodied cognition + emotion = thoughts and attitudes inferred from body movements and physical states (e.g. smiling, nodding, pushing) - inducing a body movement can predict attitude Used with ambiguous, weak, unitterpretable attitudes Rational inference process ("if i bought it, i must like it") No arousal involved
30
# system justification Compensatory stereotypes
ideological support to the status quo (e.g. woman who says that less power is justified bc happier and more social)
31
Terror Management Theory | define and strategies
Coping with knowledge of innevitable death Denial: only physical body and earthly existence will end Indirect Immortality: personal end but values and institutions live on - mortality salience = inc strive for self-esteem Belief in afterlife = dec concern for symbolic life = dec need for self-esteem
32
Attitude related to valence
-ve attitudes often have cognitive basis - group threatens personal value system; competition for resources, etc +ve attitudes often have affective bases Can have a positive affective attitude even if we have negative cog attitude troward it (e.g. dating the bad boy)
33
# attitude predicting bhvr Theory of planned bhvr
Intention - best predictor of planned, deliberate bhvr Intention dtermined by: - specific attitude toward bhvr - subjective norms (social perception) - perceived bhvr control
34
Attitude change dependent on
Source of communication: - credibility, trust, attraction, likeability Nature of communication: - unbiased, 2-sided, duration Nature of audience: - distraction, IQ, self-esteem, age
35
Processing Persuasive Communications | effectiveness and models
Effectiveness of type of persuasin (what vs how) depends on the motivation and ability of audience to pay attention + process info Heuristic-Systematic Persuasion & Elaboration Likelihood Models: Stable attitude change: ↑ motivation + ability = reflecct on merits of argument - systematic processing (HSM) - central route (ELM) Temporary attitude change: ↓ motivation + abilitiy = rely on mental shortvuts + surface characteristics - heuristic processing (HSM) - peripheral route (ELM)
36
Resisting persuasive messages | 2 ways
Given a headsup that someone is gonna try and change ur attitude Attitude Inoculation: make ppl immune to attitude change attemots by exposure to small doses of weak arguments for that piosition and make them defend their current position
37
Conformity | define, implicit, explicit
changing one's bhvr/beliefs in response to **pressure** Implicit: simply bc other ppl are doijng it Explicit: intentional influence/encouragement
38
Compliance | define
responding favourable to an explicit **request** by another person
39
Obedience | define
Submitting to the demance of authority in an unequal power relationship
40
# Conformity Automatic Mimicry | define and 2 reasons
Tendency to unconsciously mimick other ppl's bhvr (yawning) and movements (body language) Reasons for mimicry: - Ideomotor action: merely thinking about a bhvr makes it more likely to occur bc brain regions for perception and action overlap - Foster social connection: mimicking bhvr facilitates smooth, gratifying interaction
41
# Conformity Informational vs Normative Social influence | what and how to maximize
Informational: Reliance on other's comments/actions as an inidcation of what is correct, proper, or effective Leads to private acceptance and public compliance Sherif experiment Highest influence with: - ambiguous.confusing situation - crisis - other ppl perceived as experts Normative: Conformity out of desire to avoid -ve evaluation/social consequence Asch experiment: unanimous group has stronger influence Highest influence with - ↑ importance of group - ↑ proximity (space and time) - ↑ group size (to extent) - ↑ ambiguity
42
Ways to increase conformity
↑ Group size (to an extent) ↑ Unanimity ↓ Anonymity ↑Expertise = ↑ informational influence ↑Status = ↑ normative influence Interdependent cultures Gender (dependent on context/confidence)
43
List 3 types of complicance approaches
1. Head (cognition, reason) 2. Heart (affect, emotion) 3. Power of norms (majority)
44
Reason/based Approaches to compliance | focus, norm of reciprocity, door-in-the-face, foot-in-the-door, lowball
Aim to convince that a particular choice is the best Norm of Reciprocity: pressure to help those that helped you Reciprocal Concession Technique (door-in-the-face): asking a large, unreasonable favour followed by a smaller one (the focus); reduction seen as a consession/favour so that the target feels obligated to oblige Foot-in-the-door: prime with a small favour so that participant will comply to a larger one; appeals to self-image "it's just who i am" - "slipper slope" => 1 agreement provides momentum + long-term changes in self-perception Lowball Technique: get someone to commit before hidden costs are revealed - illusion of irrevocability, excitement, convenience
45
Norm-based approaches to compliance
Based on power of soical norms Appeals to head and heart Awareness of position in relation to social norm = ↑ compliance - highest compiance if info is unexpected - combats pluralistic ignorance (wrong perception of maj/min) Putting descriptive and prescriptive norms in conflict reduces compliance (e.g. isn't it a shame that so few ppl vote) - Descriptive norms: typical bhvr in given context - Prescriptive norms: what one is supposed to do (aka injunctive)
46
# obedience to authority Resisting social influence
Reactance theory: reassert prerogatives to reduce discomfort from the belief that free will is being threatened (↓ freedom = ↑ motivation to hold ground) Idiosyncrasy credits: earn with conformity, spend everytime you go against norms Practice (trained to disobey) Allyship Rumination Awareness of social norms in play
47
Exceptionalist-normalist continuum
Explains cruel directives Exceptionalist: such crimes only perpetrated by "exceptional" ppl Normalist: right circumstances, almost anyone would commit such acts (Milgram)
48
Ways to increase obedience
Release from responsibility (if legit authority) Step-by-step involvement (momentum) Unreliable social norms Ambiguity/confusing situation ↑ proximity + salience of authority ↓ proximity + salience of victim/learner
49
Group | define + characteristics
Collection of related individuals (3+) who are **interdependent** Characteristics: - similarities: beliefs, goals, etc - social norms: implicit or explicit rules that direct bhvr - social roles: shared expectations of particular members - gender roles - group cohesiveness: qualities that bind ppl + promote liking
50
Social facilitation | define, Triplett, Zajonc
Effect (+ve or -ve) that presence of others has on performance Triplett: performance with passive presence/observation - General/fundamental effect - observed in vast # of species Zajonc's Theory of Mere Presence - mere presence of others --> arousal --> ↑ dominant response tendencies - For easy/well-learned tasks: correct dominant response = improved performance - For novel/difficult tasks: incorrect dominant response = impaired performance
51
Group Decision Making | group think, advantages, self-censorship, polarization
Group think: group cohesion > rational analysis Only advantageous if motivated toward group goal with individuals who have expertise Self-censorship: withholding info/opinion in group discussions because of motivation for consensus and strong leaders Group Polarization: tendency for group decisions to be more extreme bc discussion enhances the way the group is leaning - Persuasive arguments: group discussion exposes more arguments in favour of the position that the avg person was already inclined to take ∴ strengthen initial inclination - Social comparison: belief that you are above avg ∴ present more extreme support
52
Concurrence seeking | antecedents and symptoms
Concurrence seeking = motivation Antecedent conditions: - ↑ cohesion - isolation - lack of method/poor decison making processes - directive + vocal leadership - ↑ stress Symptoms: - illusion of invulnerability - collective rationalization - belief in inherent morality of group - stereotypes of outgroups - direct pressure on dissenters to conform - self-censorship - illusion of unanimity (mindguarding)
53
Characteristics of leaders
Knowledge + skill relevent to group goal/identity Social skills to inc group cohesion + cooperation Generosity: resources for +ve reinforcement (rewards) Short-term power (Machiavelli): deception, coercion, fear, manipulation
54
Power | Define and elements
Ability to control own + other's outcomes without constraint Status: respect + prominence granted by evaluation of attributes Authority: power derived from institionalized role or arrangements within a hierarchy Dominance: bhvr intended to acquire or demonstrate power
55
Approach/Inhbition Theory
Influence of power on bhvr ↑ power = ↓ constraint + evaluation, ↑ inclination to pursue ind goals 2 core predictions: 1. Perception: ↑ power = ↓ cognitive flexibility, empathy, + creativity, ↑ reliance on stereotypes 2. Disinhibition: ↑ power = ↓ constraint = ↑ impulsive + antisocial bhvr
56
Process of Deindividuation | antecedents, intrnl + bhvrl effects
Antecedent conditions: - anonymity - diffusion of responsibility - energizing effect of others - stimulus overload Internal state: - ↓ self-observation - ↓ self-evaluation - ↓ concern with evaluations of others - ↓ internal controls (shame, fear, guilt) Bhvrl effects: - impulsivity - irrationality - emotionality - antisocial activity
57
# deindividuation Spotlight Effect
Conviction that ppl are more aware of you than they actually are
58
Social Baseline Theory
"default" human existence involves groups eVOLUTIONARY ADVANTAGE
59
# leadership Contingency Theory
Leadership effectiveness based on: - task vs relationship oriented leadership - degree of situational control
60
Social Dilemma | Define
Action is beneficial for one person but harmful for other members (self-interest vs public good)
61
Communication for cooperation
Negotiation: involves offers + counter-offers; solutions occur when both parties agree Integrative solution: concession on issues that are of greater importance to opponent (trade-offs)